It would be great. We'd be able to put those whistleblowers in their place and nip things in the bud before they get out of hand!If we had verified photo ID for all posters, there would be no risk of this being a possibility.
It would be great. We'd be able to put those whistleblowers in their place and nip things in the bud before they get out of hand!If we had verified photo ID for all posters, there would be no risk of this being a possibility.
Giving individual polling clerks agency over which rules they follow based on which they think are spurious is not a route we want to go down.
Giving rogue governments agency over who gets to vote and who doesn't is not a route we want to go down either.
But the controller still hasn't a fucking clue who their victim voted fir
Soooooooooooo.
He fucking registers the victim for a postal vote.......
Has anyone mentioned yet that the ballot as it stands is not secret?
You go in, you get a voting paper, the number on the paper is recorded against your name.
It is perfectly possible to know how every person voted.
Does anyone know what happens to ballot paper and registers after the election?I believe brogdale has mentioned it more than once.
Yet funnily enough, we don't get lurid tales about how such a system is ripe for abuse.
They are kept for a year and a day then shredded for use in birds' nestsDoes anyone know what happens to ballot paper and registers after the election?
Anyone sensible have any idea...They are kept for a year and a day then shredded for use in birds' nests
Anyone sensible have any idea...
After a year has passed, voting slips are shredded with a variety of uses including lining the nests of young ospreys.
Oh - copies of electoral registers may be consulted at each local authorityDoes anyone know what happens to ballot paper and registers after the election?
After the state have checked the names and addresses of the 14 people who vote Communist...oh, and everyone who draws a spuncking cock on their ballot, obvsThey are kept for a year and a day then shredded for use in birds' nests
Oh, shut up, DonaldI tell you what is dangerous.
Giving EVERYONE the option to vote by post on one fucking form that gets sent to every household for just one person in the household to fill in.
I haven't spoken to the spouses of all voters.
THERE IS NO POINT DOING SO BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE A SECRET BALLOT YOU ABSOLUTE PARTY BALLOON.
Could you explain why the 14 hours inside a ballot box makes it harder to link numbered ballot paper to counterfoil and thus to register? E2a not every election will see the contents of ballot boxes mixed, eg local authority elections where I doubt everything is jumbled up before counting each ward.The verification of ballot papers done at the Counting of the Votes begins with ensuring that the number of ballots given out matches the number taken out of the box.
The counterfoil numbers are kept seperate from the ballots and the use of them is usually one safeguard against photocopying ballots or using fake ones.
It would be theoretically possible to match ballot to voter were the papers not inside a sealed box for 14 hours, driven to a counting hall, and then combined with the contents of other boxes for counting. Their use is usually to ensure that the ballots were given out sequentially to avoid suspicion of missing or amended ballots.
Coercion can occur at a polling station. Staff are trained to check for people who might be standing too close to voters.
The recently passed Ballot Secrecy Act (https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3172 ) places further safeguards against coercion inside polling stations.
Many years ago now, Individual Registration was introduced to avoid the 'head of the household' issue regarding the filing in of the annual registration process. This was in response to concerns that it was possible for postal voting to be manipulated in the ways expressed with some vigor by one poster in this thread.
To return to the main requirement of this thread, the photo id rules have been introduced to solve an issue that doesn't exist, and requires younger voters to use ID they can't afford nor access. I'm certain that's the more pressing issue than whether a crypto-bro who uses "woke" as an insult should be any further indulged.
Regarding ballot matching; I'm pretty sure that I remember some past reporting of claims that the spooks were able to/did conduct such exercises in constituencies with 'extremist' candidates. Or maybe I've just been taken in by some tin-foil hatery?The verification of ballot papers done at the Counting of the Votes begins with ensuring that the number of ballots given out matches the number taken out of the box.
The counterfoil numbers are kept seperate from the ballots and the use of them is usually one safeguard against photocopying ballots or using fake ones.
It would be theoretically possible to match ballot to voter were the papers not inside a sealed box for 14 hours, driven to a counting hall, and then combined with the contents of other boxes for counting. Their use is usually to ensure that the ballots were given out sequentially to avoid suspicion of missing or amended ballots.
Coercion can occur at a polling station. Staff are trained to check for people who might be standing too close to voters.
The recently passed Ballot Secrecy Act (https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3172 ) places further safeguards against coercion inside polling stations.
Many years ago now, Individual Registration was introduced to avoid the 'head of the household' issue regarding the filing in of the annual registration process. This was in response to concerns that it was possible for postal voting to be manipulated in the ways expressed with some vigor by one poster in this thread.
To return to the main requirement of this thread, the photo id rules have been introduced to solve an issue that doesn't exist, and requires younger voters to use ID they can't afford nor access. I'm certain that's the more pressing issue than whether a crypto-bro who uses "woke" as an insult should be any further indulged.
Or nip their socks off their hands before they have a chance to get boring.It would be great. We'd be able to put those whistleblowers in their place and nip things in the bud before they get out of hand!
It's not a lot of work anyway; the ballot papers for any party candidate of interest would be bundled together at the count in a very convenient way. Just a matter of matching those numbered ballot papers with the counterfoils etc.Tbh the argument stuff can't be matched up because it's a lot of work doesn't really hold water. It's the auld 'they won't kettle thousands of people in Oxford circus' all over again. They can, and if they want to they will.
Do you think they care that much about who you vote for?Tbh the argument stuff can't be matched up because it's a lot of work doesn't really hold water. It's the auld 'they won't kettle thousands of people in Oxford circus' all over again. They can, and if they want to they will.
I can readily believe that during the era of really existing system competition the spooks were very keen to know where communist voters lived. Maybe less so today, but who knows?Do you think they care that much about who you vote for?
Not my area of expertise, granted, and I can't deny that perhaps some 'dark arts ' occurred in past years. We use paper and pencil, I can't deny that such methods haven't been exploited at/for the very fringes . Personally I doubt that it was ever done at a significant amount (though experts from Northern Ireland, let me know your experiences, I suspect there are tales to be told.)Regarding ballot matching; I'm pretty sure that I remember some past reporting of claims that the spooks were able to/did conduct such exercises in constituencies with 'extremist' candidates. Or maybe I've just been taken in by some tin-foil hatery?
We use paper and pencil, I can't deny that such methods haven't been exploited at/for the very fringes .
I remember that well. Indeed the reason why we use that particular kind of pencil is because rubbing out looks obvious, in response to rumours that 'they' would supply pens with invisible ink!At the time of the brexit referendum, i had one colleague who was advising anyone who would listen to take a pen because 'they' were going to change the X on enough 'leave' votes to change the outcome.