8ball
Decolonise colons!
Don't need to.
You clearly need to if no one believes there is an issue with widespread postal voting besides you.
Don't need to.
If it's a fact there should be evidence for it. So cough it up already.
Erm many people who arrive down the polling station to vote in person believe there is dodgy stuff going on with postal votes......You clearly need to if no one believes there is an issue with widespread postal voting besides you.
The example you cite, are centralised computers. They aren't blockchain. I wouldn't trust centralised computers that are well documented for being hacked.
You can't hack a blockchain and the voter can verify (for a very short amount of time) that their vote was registered the way they intended.
Erm many people who arrive down the polling station to vote in person believe there is dodgy stuff going on with postal votes......
......but the election has already been won or lost with dodgy fucking postal votes by that point.
So you are trusting the interface software not to change your vote but print out the person you voted for.
The interface sofware would be open source and can be run on any device. Bring 5 of your own devices to the polling booth, they will all give you the same answer.
Given the lengths you would go to, to preserve something that's not needed, yup, they do swing elections.Ah, so you assume the dodgy postal votes are both sufficient and systematically skewed in one direction to actually determine an election result.
The polling booth insures a secret ballot.There would be no need for a polling booth with blockchain technologies (unless you deliberately engineered it to require them). Anywhere with internet access would work.
So why aren't electronic voting systems open-source already? And why would blockchain interface software be any different?The interface sofware would be open source and can be run on any device. Bring 5 of your own devices to the polling booth, they will all give you the same answer.
When my postal ballot arrives and my Dad presents it to me asking me to vote and sign for it, otherwise I'm on the street.
THERE IS NO ELECTION OBSERVER PRESENT IN OUR KITCHEN
Given the lengths you would go to, to preserve something that's not needed, yup, they do swing elections.
You can't win this one.
There's no need for most people to have a PV and I would argue that in an ideal world, no one would need one.
The polling booth insures a secret ballot.
So it appears you're not deliberatly defending election fraud, you're just thick.
That's not the evidence of widespread integrity issues with postal voting that I asked for. That's a scenario you just made up in your head. Could it happen? Sure. To the degree that justifies withdrawing the postal vote? Well, we're gonna need solid evidence for that happening before we take any actions which might abridge the democratic rights of certain minorities.
If you don't like love, just go fuck off and simmer.
Mate, it's a Sunday, let's just agree to disagree and calm down.If you don't like love, just go fuck off and simmer.
Oh I can.You’re the one who can’t read.
Oh I can.
Electronic voting doesn't eliminate the need for a polling booth.
The polling booth is there to maintain the secret vote. I don't expect many lefties to understand that, because democracy is a strange alien concept to lefties.
No. It's a brave new world out there.Mate, it's a Sunday, let's just agree to disagree and calm down.
It's impossible to have remote voting without losing the secret ballot, though I'm open to being proved wrong.Electronic voting can help to make remote voting more secure where required.
Ooooh, so that's what this whole theatre production has been about.Oh I can.
Electronic voting doesn't eliminate the need for a polling booth.
The polling booth is there to maintain the secret vote. I don't expect many lefties to understand that, because democracy is a strange alien concept to lefties.
.....oh dear.woke
It's an argument between valid, empirical data and your perception of the scale of coercion.What use is a higher turnout if many people, vulnerable ones in particular, lose their right to a secret ballot?
"Sacred right"?It does because I take their rights seriously.
You don't. If you did, you would be racking your brains for a way in which everyone has the secret ballot. The secret ballot is a sacred right.
It's impossible to have remote voting without losing the secret ballot, though I'm open to being proved wrong.
Yup several stops past Barking. Anyone with half a brain cell knows what's going on here. The voter ID thing had been introduced for purely idealogical reasons; to disenfranchise those more likely to vote for candidates on the left of the political spectrum. Democracy is being denied to a large chunk of the population as a consequence. And you have the gall to insinuate that it is an 'alien concept to lefties'. Doctor, my sides.Oh I can.
Electronic voting doesn't eliminate the need for a polling booth.
The polling booth is there to maintain the secret vote. I don't expect many lefties to understand that, because democracy is a strange alien concept to lefties.