HoratioCuthbert
Deep seated inconsequence
I thought my pulse oximeter was detecting red electrons
I thought my pulse oximeter was detecting red electrons
Insult? I haven't made one insult in my post, let alone "hurled" them.Wow so pleasant and friendly - can you hold a discussion without hurling insults?
This was probably what I had heard about - new regulations for EV charge points last year
Many of the lampposts in my road in Lambeth have been converted to EV charge points and Lambeth plan to roll out many more EV charge points as part of their kerbside strategy in the next few years.
"everyone will do this" - the vast majority of people are law abiding and don't want to get a criminal record so I don't accept that everyone will do this as the EV charge points will be designed to charge faster that a standard plug and they are positioned on the outside of the property thus removing the need to run a cable from inside the house to the outside - only a minority of people are likely to want to circumvent things.
Sadiq Khan is talking about road pricing in London as he wants to shore up TFL and keep it from going bankrupt as fewer people are using the buses and tubes - his keenness to expand ULEZ to cover all of London has been exposed as a want to get ANPR cameras installed ready for road charging
So your plan is let TFL collapse and people can drive where they like? Something tells me that your repeated claim this is in the interest of the less well-off isn't completely sincere.Sadiq Khan is talking about road pricing in London as he wants to shore up TFL and keep it from going bankrupt as fewer people are using the buses and tubes - his keenness to expand ULEZ to cover all of London has been exposed as a want to get ANPR cameras installed ready for road charging
Of course, let TfL go bust so that everyone is forced to use a car, that's going to make it so much easier for you to drive around isn't it?Sadiq Khan is talking about road pricing in London as he wants to shore up TFL and keep it from going bankrupt as fewer people are using the buses and tubes - his keenness to expand ULEZ to cover all of London has been exposed as a want to get ANPR cameras installed ready for road charging
I'd rather TFL concentrated on their essential services such as running public transport as efficiently as possible and look to extend bus services to cover areas that are not well served and stop supporting councils blocking side streets as that creates congestion on bus routes that TFL are responsible forI guess keeping TfL from going bankrupt is not on your 20-point plan for things to do instead of LTNs then, or perhaps you are going to plant magic money trees to deal with this.
surely notCars cause congestion btw. Less cars means clearer roads for busses.
Where's this petition?look to extend bus services to cover areas that are not well served
Crazy innitsurely not
All of the charge points outside of the home could apply some VED type charge and the government would need to figure out how to account for home charge points in a similar way - there will always be people who try to avoid paying tax and there will be ways of detecting them such as cable running from the home to the car parked in the road - you will never stop everyone trying to evade tax but I'd say it would be better to go down that route than require ANPR cameras to be installed all over the UKInsult? I haven't made one insult in my post, let alone "hurled" them.
The charging point regs do not do anything of what you want them to be able to in terms of tax. There's no record of how much of the electricity used goes through the charge point for a start. Smart grids will mean that the charge point and the grid can talk to each other and the grid can say to the charge point "now is a good time to charge" or "please don't charge now if you can avoid it" and the charge point can respond.
One of the plans for using EVs on a smart grid is to have their batteries as a distributed storage system, so you can charge up at night when electricity is cheap, maybe even free, and then sell back to the grid when during the day or evening when it's expensive, or just use the electricity in your house directly yourself.
Obviously none of that could work of you were whacking a huge tax on the electricity going to an EV.
EVs do 2-4 miles per kwh. Current fuel duty is about 6p per mile based on 40mpg so that means you need to add 12p-24p per kwh if I've done the maths right.
That's getting on for doubling the cost compared to just running an extension cord off a normal socket, especially once the current prices fall back down over the next year.
Of course it doesn't matter because you can't apply the tax like that anyway, but even if you could... Well let's just look at red diesel fraud shall we?
"HM Revenue and Customs’ latest published estimate of the fraudulent use of red diesel in Great Britain is 1% of the market share, and for Northern Ireland, 4% of the market share. This results in a total UK duty and VAT loss of an estimated £150 million for the tax year 2020-21."
And around 15% of diesel sold is red diesel.
Red Diesel Rule Changes from 1 April 2022
From 1 April 2022, changes to UK law mean that many people and businesses who use red diesel (AKA rebated fuel; gas oil; tractor diesel) will need to switch to more costly white diesel, which carries the full Fuel Duty rate.www.fuelproof.co.uk
So 1/15th of red diesel is used fraudulently... That's a huge chunk and it's easy to detect and enforce. There would be no way of telling or enforcing people used their "legal" electricity, and drivers as a group are not majority law abiding as more than half admit to speeding.
And if running an extension bothered you, you could just get an external socket fitted next to your ev charge point which you could use. Charging speed doesn't matter when you've got all night, home charging sockets are not the 60kw fast charging beasts that public chargers can be.
So your idea doesn't work technically and is far too easy to bypass anyway plus with no way to enforce it nobody is going to worry about criminal records.
Sadiq Khan keeps saying TFL have no money and has to go to the government for a bailout every year so they should curtail some of their plans to spend money and stick to running public transport and keeping the traffic moving on the roads they are responsible for.So your plan is let TFL collapse and people can drive where they like? Something tells me that your repeated claim this is in the interest of the less well-off isn't completely sincere.
And LTNs make congestion worseCars cause congestion btw. Less cars means clearer roads for busses.
I'm not sure some sort of inspector coming round your house to see what you've got plugged in would go down well with sort of people who are signing this petition, Ian.the government would need to figure out how to account for home charge points in a similar way
I'd question the remit of TFL on thatWhere's this petition?
TFL manages public transport and main roads in London, and has a target that 80% of all journeys will be made on foot, by cycle or using public transport by 2041. Reducing road capacity has to be part of meeting that target, and I'm not sure Ian's List of Suggestions is going to cut it.
We have smart meters so I'm sure they can develop smart EV charge meters that tell the supplier how much electricity has been used for an EV/hybrid connected vehicle and add an EV fuel duty cost to the bill the consumer pays - that would be much easier than installing ANPR cameras everywhere across the UKI'm not sure some sort of inspector coming round your house to see what you've got plugged in would go down well with sort of people who are signing this petition, Ian.
And we're back to What Ian Reckons. What about the research? No, that's research from Imperial College, who are all biased and use bad data. Is there any research to the contrary? No, Ian shouldn't have to do that. And so the cycle continues.And LTNs make congestion worse
Sadiq Khan keeps saying TFL have no money and has to go to the government for a bailout every year so they should curtail some of their plans to spend money and stick to running public transport and keeping the traffic moving on the roads they are responsible for.
No. The only allowable data is a fifteen minute clip of that man with a whiteboard. All other data is cherry-picked.And we're back to What Ian Reckons. What about the research? No, that's research from Imperial College, who are all biased and use bad data. Is there any research to the contrary? No, Ian shouldn't have to do that. And so the cycle continues.
I took it from their about page on their website.I'd question the remit of TFL on that
Wait, hang on, I didn't realise you were sure they could this. I had my doubts but now I know Ian's sure...I'm sure they can
If you're hoping for the congestion of clauses to evaporate, you're out of luck. I don't know if it's a conspiracist thing, or if they learn it in closed facebook groups, or what. But every sentence has to go something like "How can you be in favour of these illegal LTNs that are an abuse of power and displace traffic to boundary roads where poorer people live causing extra congestion while people in LTNs drive their cars on our roads and on and on and on and onGrammarly's Complete Punctuation Guide
Whether you're looking for a grammar checker or just want to brush up on grammar rules, we have you covered.www.grammarly.com
I can't believe I'm agreeing with teuchter what is the world coming to?There's not a need to have millions of anpr cameras to do road pricing. The data would be recorded in the vehicle.
ffygetting hot under the collar about sitting longer in traffic, it's your own fault for unnecessarily driving a car in London.
It reminds me of my mate Dan who Reckons the government must want us to smoke weed because otherwise they'd just invent a herbicide that would kill all the cannabis in the world because that sounds easy.