Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Peterborough by-election, 6 June 2019

Well it is I think safe to say that at this precise moment the Labour Party bigwigs do not themselves know which horse to back?
The makeup of the Labour membership and electoral coalition is such that they are currently unable to choose one horse or the other without collapsing their vote in strategically important places, or destroying the party altogether. It isn't that they don't know which horse to back - it's that either horse fucks them right up.
 
The makeup of the Labour membership and electoral coalition is such that they are currently unable to choose one horse or the other without collapsing their vote in strategically important places, or destroying the party altogether. It isn't that they don't know which horse to back - it's that either horse fucks them right up.
which comes to the same thing.
 
The makeup of the Labour membership and electoral coalition is such that they are currently unable to choose one horse or the other without collapsing their vote in strategically important places, or destroying the party altogether. It isn't that they don't know which horse to back - it's that either horse fucks them right up.

Indeed. So continue to back the non-runner (i.e campaign on all the other issues, as apparently happened in Peterborough) and you might continue to get your money back.

Who started all these horse/betting analogies anyway?
 
AV was the shittiest of alternatives, and the one that the Lib Dems calculated would be most to their advantage. It was rightfully rejected, and isn't "proportional representation". As for choosing person as well as party, that's bollocks if you're a tribal voter.
Even tribal voters might not be so keen on the party hacks who end up at the top of the party lists. STV would to me seem better as you choose both party and preferred candidate.
 
Seems very clear that the BP candidate was some anonymous turkey and yet BP almost took the seat.Each time posters on here reflect on the need for Labour to dissemble on the issue of leave or remain I find myself wondering where they would be in the polls if they came firmly down on the side of leave.Certainly from a Midlands perspective when Labour frontbenchers are on TV enthusing about a second referendum they very much present the spectacle of a man,or woman,pissing into the wind.
A lot of candidates and sitting MPs are anonymous turkeys
 
Further proof, if any more were needed that Labour under Corbyn are unelectable.
I totally disagree. Considering the circumstances that led to the by-election and the fact that there was a lot of focus on the supposed resurgent libdems, and that it was a string leave constituency I a very pleased and a bit supervised that labour won. An important fact to note is that the Labour Party can still mobilise considerably more activists than any other party. It all bodes well for a general election Labour victory
 
Peterborough is very relevant. It’s relevant because it proves the non policy policy is electorally the best bet the LP has (whether it’s the right approach politically is another matter entirely).

I’d also add that Johnson, Gove or whoever wins will have almost three years to move brexit along before they need to call a GE. The one thing that unites tories at present is their determination not to have a GE. It’s perfectly plausible for a deal to have been done by then AND the debate to be about the second phase by then
The Labour Party didn’t fight the election on its Brexit stance, it campaigned against austerity and the erosion of our NHS. Considering the outgoing labour MP had been forced to leave following a prison sentence, the Party will have expected a massive drop in support, and will be very happy with this result. In first past the post winning is all that counts not by how many votes
 
I totally disagree. Considering the circumstances that led to the by-election and the fact that there was a lot of focus on the supposed resurgent libdems, and that it was a string leave constituency I a very pleased and a bit supervised that labour won. An important fact to note is that the Labour Party can still mobilise considerably more activists than any other party. It all bodes well for a general election Labour victory

:facepalm:
 
You seem to be addressing tories...not many of them will read that on here.

The Tories can go fuck themselves. They've been a shit government, their 'leader' (such as she is) has been shit, and their policies ... er ... have they got any?
Screw the fucking Tories, this is an alert for Labour to sort out so the party can win the next election - something that won't happen unless there are very big and very obvious changes.
 
A -17% swing bears this out....
A by-election held after the sitting labour MP was forced to step down by the electorate, coupled with some people trying to make every election about Brexit - I’m surprised the swing against wasn’t much bigger. It was a good result for labour. Once the GE campaign starts and labour produces a manifesto to tackle the day to day issues affecting the electorate like they did last time, I’m confident we will see labour rise through the polls once again. Labour went into the last election 20% behind remember
 
You should listen to the interview with Andy Macdonald on the Today programme this morning for an idea of the movement Labour is currently preparing for, assuming a no-dealer ends up in no.10 - Remain/Reform, but only as a way of avoiding no deal, with a big focus on the effect no deal would have car manufacturing, steel industry etc. It's a very enjoyable interview all in tbh, he wipes the floor with Humphreys.
 
eh?
Go on...

pbe-jpg.173474


Well, in a democracy political parties need votes or they don't get into government, and Labour lost truck loads of votes.
I don't give a shit about the massive number the tories lost excepting the pleasure it gives me to see them flop.
Back to it. Labour came way too close to losing a seat to a brand new party, so the reasons have to be properly looked at, then sorted out. If that means losing the leader in favour of someone decent, so be it.
Much as the more left here will shout at me and probably call me a good few names. the leader of the Labour party is a useless wanker and much of the blame for this near defeat lies right at his door.
Corbyn was crap, is crap, and will be crap in the future so, if Labour is to win, he has to go.
No, before some silly fucker says it, not another popularist Blair, but the job needs someone with a likeable personality, something the glorious leader is short of.
I blame Corbyn for much of this mess - He's doing for Labour what May has done for the tories, just not as badly .... yet.
 
Back
Top Bottom