Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

People getting racially abused because of the referendum result

Why mention him?
Because I thought it was him what first said "We are citizens of the world".
I was wrong, he just borrowed it from Socrates.

Anyway, Mrs May said the other day that "If you think you are a citizen of the world you are a citizen of nowhere" .

So that's the point. She said that because of brexit. It was, I think, a surprising thing to say, and a sad one.
 
no. I'm not sneering. I'm a bit scared about the fact that she said it and felt that it was the right thing to say to please the people that she thinks voted leave.
How do you feel about her saying that ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
seventh bullet Anyone who expresses any concern about the way in which the current administration is interpreting the referendum result is actually just 'sneering' and calling all leave voters thick racist cunts?
So basically May's and Rudd's recent speeches must not be criticised in any way. Right.
 
Because I thought it was him what first said "We are citizens of the world".
I was wrong, he just borrowed it from Socrates.

Anyway, Mrs May said the other day that "If you think you are a citizen of the world you are a citizen of nowhere" .

So that's the point. She said that because of brexit. It was, I think, a surprising thing to say, and a sad one.

Parochialism, that's what she's promoting. Insularism is the in thing right now, it seems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
Complacent to just say 'is it?' A massively depressing poll was posted earlier either on this thread or on another in which people who voted to leave were asked if they would accept a pay cut in order to reduce immigration. Regardless of whether or not they actually would when it comes down to it, more than 60 percent said they would. Only 30 percent said they wouldn't. You, and many other leave supporters on here, are probably in that 30 percent, but if so, you're in a minority, and your voice is not the one that is being listened to.

It is these kinds of numbers that have driven the govt's response so far - they've been very clear that 'brexit means brexit' means closing previously open borders to reduce immigration. Given that the UK is an island, 'insularism' seems a pretty apt term for such a thing.
 
Complacent to just say 'is it?' A massively depressing poll was posted earlier either on this thread or on another in which people who voted to leave were asked if they would accept a pay cut in order to reduce immigration. Regardless of whether or not they actually would when it comes down to it, more than 60 percent said they would. Only 30 percent said they wouldn't. You, and many other leave supporters on here, are probably in that 30 percent, but if so, you're in a minority, and your voice is not the one that is being listened to.

It is these kinds of numbers that have driven the govt's response so far - they've been very clear that 'brexit means brexit' means closing previously open borders to reduce immigration. Given that the UK is an island, 'insularism' seems a pretty apt term for such a thing.

Has there been another poll where immigration was not the top reason for voting to leave? And what is this 'probably'? We're all suspect.
 

Racist attack? Uh, no.

"Aleksandra Mut, 23, and younger sister Angelika Mut, 20, went berserk after two men they were with began making flirty comments towards the three women at the end of a night out."

Women attacking women their dates flirt with isn't very noble, but it's motivated by jealousy, not racism (and probably fueled by plenty alcohol.) It wouldn't have been racism unless the women they beat up weren't white and the article doesn't say. There's no such thing as reverse racism, or reverse xenophobia, Chrisake. :facepalm:



Brexit was a side issue in a row between two drunken neighbours that escalated. The perp had previous for violence.

Two neighbours, Keating and Dunn, start arguing in the shared garden of their sheltered accommodation. First it was about Brexit, then about Keating leaving the taps on and flooding other residents' flats. Dunn started battering Keating, who later died.

"A pathologist concluded that Mr Keating had died from positional asphyxia and intoxication through consumption of alcohol, methadone and cannabis."

"At the time, Dunn was on bail for smashing up his friend’s flat in Miles Platting with a hammer, before hitting him with it in July 2015. The victim suffered a fractured collarbone, a broken rib, a punctured lung and ‘massive’ bruising."

Dunn, 62, was locked up for four years and five months at Manchester Crown Court after admitting assault occasioning actual bodily harm against Mr Keating.
 
Racist attack? Uh, no.

"Aleksandra Mut, 23, and younger sister Angelika Mut, 20, went berserk after two men they were with began making flirty comments towards the three women at the end of a night out."

Women attacking women their dates flirt with isn't very noble, but it's motivated by jealousy, not racism (and probably fueled by plenty alcohol.) It wouldn't have been racism unless the women they beat up weren't white and the article doesn't say. There's no such thing as reverse racism, or reverse xenophobia, Chrisake. :facepalm:

What is it then?
 
What is it then?
Um, I said what it is in the post, "it's motivated by jealousy." They attacked three women their dates were flirting with. The salacious headline suggests they just battered some women randomly in a racist attack. Nasty and not acceptable, but the paper clearly has an agenda trying to make it all about racism, against white English people of course.
 
14712752_1309895089054505_7059211350586383170_o.jpg


Hate Crime, England and Wales, 2015/16
 
Women attacking women their dates flirt with isn't very noble, but it's motivated by jealousy, not racism (and probably fueled by plenty alcohol.) It wouldn't have been racism unless the women they beat up weren't white and the article doesn't say. There's no such thing as reverse racism, or reverse xenophobia, Chrisake. :facepalm:

Sorry but what the actual fuck?
 
It's always tricky with these kinds of stats. Recorded racist crimes have gone up every year in the period covered. Does that mean there have been more racist attacks over that period? Probably not, tbh - just either that more attacks are being reported or, more likely, that the police are becoming increasingly more likely to record particular instances as racially aggravated.

That said, the figures for this year show a different shape and that pronounced spike following the referendum won't be down to changing police practices.
 
seemed like it was a jealousy motivated attack no?

With a nationalist element thrown in, no? Which makes it officially a hate crime

Two sisters who yelled 'Poland rule the world' as they battered three women in a savage racist street attack were caught - after their victims found them on Facebook.

[...]

When the English girls tried to laugh it off, the Mut sisters shouted: 'oh do you want the English sl*t b**ches?'

Aleksandra told one of the girls: “Don’t mess with us Polish girls” before asking: “Do you want to fight?” and then joined Angelika in setting about the women.

And from the link CRI provided above:

Hate crime is defined as ‘any criminal offence which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice towards someone based on a personal characteristic.’

So if the women who were attacked (or any other person) perceive this to be a hate crime, it is.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom