She's not losing much support in Myanmar over this though. Nor, more importantly, are the military. That doesn't affect right or wrong, but the chorus of righteous indignation in the west is feeding a very disturbing, uneven polarisation in Myanmar: a growing virulent, sometimes violent nationalist tendency fed by wealthy domestic interests, 'blood and soil' interpretations of Buddhism AND by an international press who a great many people in Myanmar feel are permanently one-sided and have wholly misrepresented the conflict; and on the other side, the ever-persecuted Rohingya. Between these, human rights advocates, politically-savvy individuals and monks, and non-Rohingya Muslims - the only ones who might be able to shift opinion on the ground - are being drowned out, effectively silenced. ASSK's leadership remains important but it's other factors which are generating an impossible climate for any sensible discussion of the Rohingya issue in Myanmar.