equationgirl
Respect my existence or expect my resistance
More than BirchillShould put a warning, I have only been reading about this for two or three days, about five hours of reading total
More than BirchillShould put a warning, I have only been reading about this for two or three days, about five hours of reading total
none the wiser, burd or geezer?
cheesus! read the article -She's a woman . She called perez hilton (gossip monger and annoying tit) a 'messy faggot'. She said this wasn't homophobic as it describes 'any man who acts like a woman'.
Some one posted this hilarious article on the laurie penny thread - http://crunkfeministcollective.word...ealia-banks-and-white-gay-cis-male-privilege/
Its a great example of the end game of privilege politics - apparently calling him a faggots fine cos the real issue is white gay male stealing black women cultural bodies 9or some such
cheesus! read the article -She's a woman . She called perez hilton (gossip monger and annoying tit) a 'messy faggot'. She said this wasn't homophobic as it describes 'any man who acts like a woman'.
Some one posted this hilarious article on the laurie penny thread - http://crunkfeministcollective.word...ealia-banks-and-white-gay-cis-male-privilege/
Its a great example of the end game of privilege politics - apparently calling him a faggots fine cos the real issue is white gay male stealing black women cultural bodies 9or some such
gossip monger on the internetswho the JSPRC is perez hilton?
right, read the Moore article - maybe as I'm not transexual I didn't see what was offensive in it - can someone point out the offending bits? Birchall was trolling - haven't read the Bindle stuff yet though
No no, they're just starting a debate!revealing this ain't it. as soon as one of their own clan is attacked the observer's only too happy to print a load of bigoted shit that probably even the daily mail wouldn't touch and alienate half their social worker readership - cronies before principles (even sacredly held ones) everytime
Birchall was trolling - haven't read the Bindle stuff yet though
Hi. I just wanted to say, in response to comments like this and others I've seen on Twitter, that should you wish to complain about the decision to publish this piece, it is an Observer column, not a Guardian one (though of course, we share a website, so it's understandable that online readers don't make this distinction).
The Observer has its own readers' editor:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/observer-readers-editor
Didn't spot this but the Guardian is already distancing it's self, from one of their web-team:
TBH, if you're the guardian readers editor and your inbox just got Helm's Deeped by furious e-mails, you'd want to direct it at the right person.
I saw Rusbridger making it very clear on Twitter that this was definitely the Observer of which he is definitely not the editor.
You geek!TBH, if you're the guardian readers editor and your inbox just got Helm's Deeped by furious e-mails, you'd want to direct it at the right person.
More than two you slackerYeh, I saw that.
I wonder if this will be the first push of the snowball that leads to a separate website for the Observer.
There's not much between them. They are two different heads on the lernaen hydra.
How many cliches can I get into one post?
so twitter rage wasn't caused by the article, but by Moore's reaction on Twitter to the article, which made it worse - Moore did get arsey tbf -http://storify.com/leftytgirl/suzanne-moore-timeline-of-trans-misogynistic-twitt
It's this, the intial 'brazilian transsexual' comment could have been sorted - the exploding intentional stuff, and refusal to recognise any of it or apologise is what caused the storm.
so twitter rage wasn't caused by the article, but by Moore's reaction on Twitter to the article, which made it worse - Moore did get arsey tbf -
More than two you slacker
You geek!
right - didn't look right when I wrote it but couldn't be bothered checkingWell done. That's the first time I've seen someone make that mistake the other way round. Her name is Burchill and is thankfully no relation of mine.
I used to hate twitter but so many prominent people have hung themselves on it.
The only person who seems to realise how powerful it is is John Prescott and he uses it to great effect. Never thought I'd say anything like that but it is true.
That'd explain the typo. BTW "clinches" - beautiful Freudian slip.What do you think I am a lazy journalist?