Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Israel in coordinated missile attacks on Gaza

and entirely new .. and fits in exactly with biog oil interests

its more because of the aftermath of ww2

durruti02 said:
oh btw the only reason i am not at the march is i having a nasty head cold/cough etc

likewise i have not gone for fear of being labelled an agent-provocateur, and also because i am ill
 
no i disagree .. read up on the support for israel amongst teh texans / oil etc and the southern churches .. the bastionof zionism in the US ios no longer the sterotypical jewish new yorker but the south .. IF there was no mid east oil there would be NO israel .. for right or wrong

However we got to the point of knee-jerk US support for IL, the question now is more like:

Aye. When CNN reports the year's 100th death from starvation in Detroit, what odds $2,500,000,000 a year to prop up New-Jersey-on-the-Med?


There are two other linked reasons why the US supports IL in general and the settlers in particular.

The maddest of the settlers are US citizens.

It seems to me that they go to the West Bank to live out some kind of living-on-the-frontier dream - wandering around with automatic weapons over their shoulders, shooting pesky natives with impunity.

Wherever they go, the Cavalry shows up to protect them, and if the natives get restless they're rounded up and coralled in reservations.

Their religious nuttery is, it seems to me, merely a cover for this game of Wild West.

The US as a whole cannot acknowledge that this is wrong. If it did, it'd have to hand itself back to the Native Americans.
 
its more because of the aftermath of ww2
yep, I think that has a lot to do with it, re-evaluating the relationship and finding we have many things in common (the old-testament/tanach for a start).

But none of that should equal support for what the state of Israel is doing to a helpless population.
 
its more because of the aftermath of ww2

likewise i have not gone for fear of being labelled an agent-provocateur, and also because i am ill
but was not the post WW2 carve up oil based? it was after WW1 when churchill was bombing the kurds for anglo persian oil
 
Thats very wrong IMHO. The support for Israel is not because the West needs a destabilizing force in the ME, its because of (mainly) US domestic politics, for which they are willing to accept the immense destabilization (and cost) that Israel causes.

no they need a destablising force cos of the oil in the area. allows them to legitimse their regieme changes when they feel like it...
 
no they need a destablising force cos of the oil in the area. allows them to legitimse their regieme changes when they feel like it...

No, because there was no need for that at the time Israel was created - Egypt was still a Western ally, as was Jordan, as was Iraq in fact as was every other state in the ME.

By the West supporting Israel, and the actions of Israel itself, a lot of the oil (and non-oil) states in the region actually got further away from the West, not closer to it. A pro-Israeli stance was a tremendous complicating factor that required further action by the West to ensure that those states did not go (or if they did go, didnt stay) to the Soviet sphere of influence, or turn to pan-Arabism.

IMHO if the zionists had failed in 1947 the ME would probably still be pro-Western.
 
No, because there was no need for that at the time Israel was created - Egypt was still a Western ally, as was Jordan, as was Iraq in fact as was every other state in the ME.

By the West supporting Israel, and the actions of Israel itself, a lot of the oil (and non-oil) states in the region actually got further away from the West, not closer to it. A pro-Israeli stance was a tremendous complicating factor that required further action by the West to ensure that those states did not go (or if they did go, didnt stay) to the Soviet sphere of influence, or turn to pan-Arabism.

IMHO if the zionists had failed in 1947 the ME would probably still be pro-Western.

what even after the shas over throw or the funding of iraq against iran their interventons in syria lebanon afghanistain particlarlly afghanistan.

we don't even have to look back that far to see the distrust of the west by the ME look at the whole deal that Larence sold them...
 
Already fine line into outright anti-semitism well and truly crossed. Prick. "Formed in diaspora" indeed. Ignorant fool.

While some of our culture is a remnant of what we brought out of Israel with us, much of it was formed in Diaspora. Jewish culture isn't just Judaic ritual, dwyer.
 
So Dwyer's throwing around accusations of anti-Semitism because, er, he's annoyed? Nice to see the superior and well-informed intellect at work :)


Jewish culture isn't just Judaic ritual, dwyer.

And synagogue practice and ritual would be a product of, er... er...


I look forward to Dwyer's photos of Second Temple era ritual in full flow anytime recently. Mount Gezirim doesn't count, as my new pal the Samaritan priest will be happy to explain at great length to Professor Dwyer.
 
So Dwyer's throwing around accusations of anti-Semitism because, er, he's annoyed? Nice to see the superior and well-informed intellect at work :)




And synagogue practice and ritual would be a product of, er... er...
A patchwork quilt of vague remembrances, new additions and whatever else was needed. The usual stuff that comprises Jewish culture. :)
I'm aware that synagogue ritual has continually undergone it's own changes over the centuries, but it is a relatively "fixed point" when measured against other aspects of Diaspora Jewish cultures.
 
Not to get too far off topic, and not contradicting VP's basic point, but it is my understanding that synagogues were in existance while the temple worship still continued (until around 60AD).
 
yes there were.

basically in talmudic palestine, society was quite divided, among the jews there were two classes of people - the "am haaretz" (workers/peasants etc) and a small minority of highly educated rabbinic scholars - who regarded the am haaretz with absolute contempt, thinking they were stupid, illiterate etc

as well as there being other sects such as samaritans etc

not meaning to generalise but i think this division was one of the factors that led to the establishment of synagogues in palestine before the exile of the jews - the ordinary people in the countryside could not easily make the long trips to jerusalem for sacrifices etc, and they were not given a warm welcome when they did manage to attend, so it became a once-yearly event - or even less frequent than that

maybe vp or someone can explain this a bit better than i can ... but this is basically what i remember from reading about it ages ago ..
 
Not to get too far off topic, and not contradicting VP's basic point, but it is my understanding that synagogues were in existance while the temple worship still continued (until around 60AD).

Funnily enough, I was just reading this over my tea:
The earliest building to qualify... is at Nabratein, which has benches, a bima and marks where a lectern might have stood, and its date is no later than the middle of the 2nd century CE.

...An inscription from Cyrenacia in North Africa at Bernike (modern Benghazi) in the Diaspora is precisely dated to 55/6 [CE]...

Critical, therefore, becomes the Theodotos Inscription... found at the southern end of the Ophen (the ridge south of the Temple Mount)... Afther it was found in the Weil excavations on the Ophel, 1913-14, it was initially dated at the immediate pre-66 period, but that date has been challenged more recently by those who place it much later (to the 2nd or 3rd centuries). But John Kloppenberg, after an extremely detail analysis, has shown the flaws in that challenge...

John Bowker, Aerial Atlas of the Holy Land, p 170

Bowker is a serious scholar, a relatively open-minded Christian, and an Honorary Canon of Canterbury Cathedral.

John Kloppenberg Chair of the Department and Centre for the Study of Religion at the University of Toronto.

So the evidence for pre-diaspora synagogues come down to one man's revisionist history of one stone tablet :)
 
yes there were.

basically in talmudic palestine, society was quite divided, among the jews there were two classes of people - the "am haaretz" (workers/peasants etc) and a small minority of highly educated rabbinic scholars - who regarded the am haaretz with absolute contempt, thinking they were stupid, illiterate etc

as well as there being other sects such as samaritans etc

not meaning to generalise but i think this division was one of the factors that led to the establishment of synagogues in palestine before the exile of the jews - the ordinary people in the countryside could not easily make the long trips to jerusalem for sacrifices etc, and they were not given a warm welcome when they did manage to attend, so it became a once-yearly event - or even less frequent than that

maybe vp or someone can explain this a bit better than i can ... but this is basically what i remember from reading about it ages ago ..

Wasnt there a second Temple in Egypt somewhere? I seem to remember something about a site after that was in use after the First Temple was destroyed thats called tell-el-yehuda or something similar now.
 
After that archaeological interlude :D - this:


LONDON (Reuters) - The U.S. military has sought to hire a merchant ship to deliver ammunition to Israel this month, tender documents show, but the Pentagon said the shipment was not linked to the conflict in the Gaza Strip.

In the tender documents, the U.S. Navy's Military Sealift Command (MSC) said the ship was to carry 325 standard 20-foot containers of what is listed as "ammunition" on two separate journeys from the Greek port of Astakos to the Israeli port of Ashdod in mid-to-late January.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/usPoliticsNews/idUKTRE50874B20090110

FAX / TEL the Port Authority at Astakos Greece asking them not to allow weapons shipments to Israel to be loaded at their port.

Port Authority Station of Astakos
Tel: +30 26460 41052
Fax: +30 26460 41052

Greek comrades may be very, very interested :D

Reuters headline now reads "U.S. says arms shipment to Israel not linked to Gaza" - never believe anything until it's been officially denied! - as someone resembling Claud Cockburn wrote.
 
After that archaeological interlude :D - this:




Greek comrades may be very, very interested :D

Reuters headline now reads "U.S. says arms shipment to Israel not linked to Gaza" - never believe anything until it's been officially denied! - as someone resembling Claud Cockburn wrote.

http://athens.indymedia.org/front.php3?lang=el&article_id=966659

Yeap this seems to be confirmed. It is more than interesting to say the least. I do not know if there is anything planned up to now, but I bet that there will be... at least some demos in that area.

I will keep you posted of any updates.
 
While some of our culture is a remnant of what we brought out of Israel with us, much of it was formed in Diaspora. Jewish culture isn't just Judaic ritual, dwyer.

As you admit here, Jewish culture was most certainly not "formed in diaspora." It developed in diaspora, but it was formed in Israel.

I'd be interested to know whether, as a Jew, you agree with Laptop that diaspora is also "where it belongs."
 
Dear our Greek comrades,

We are issuing the following call to the Greek and international movement.
We want to ask your opinion about this call, and to work together jointly
to publicize this attempt to ship arms from Greece and to block the
shipment. Do you this can be achieved, even media attention? Do you think
labor unions, particularly of port workers, would become involved? Please
keep us informed about any actions or further information you discover,
including potentially involved companies or any other details.

We will translate and publicize any actions you do in Arabic and the Arab
media.

Towards victory!

In solidarity

Information Dept - PFLP

The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine calls upon the Greek
movement, the Greek people and all international progressive forces to
halt the planned shipment of U.S. arms to Israel from the Greek port of
Astakos. International media reports have revealed that the U.S. Navy is
attempting to ship 325 20-foot containers of ammunition, over 3000 tons,
in an emergency shipment of arms to aid the occupation in its ongoing war
crimes against the Palestinian people in Gaza.

The PFLP is calling upon the people of the world, and particularly the
Greek movement to act to stop this shipment of arms. The U.S. has been
attempting to hire a merchant ship to transport the weaponry to the
Israelis at Asdud port in mid- to late January. This weaponry must not be
allowed to enter the hands of the Israelis, where it will be used to
massacre our people in Gaza! It must be stopped by all means!

These bombs are going to be used in Israel's wars - against Palestinians,
Lebanese, Arabs, Iranians, and the people of the region. This emergency
shipment indicates that the occupier is demanding ever more weaponry in
its futile war of massacres against the Palestinian people and the
Palestinian resistance.

The demand of the Palestinian people, the Arab people, and all progressive
forces - including the progressive forces in the U.S. - is the
international isolation and the end of all U.S. aid to Israel. The U.S.
government, however is Israel's strategic partner, and is committed to
partnering with Israel in its massacres and crimes against our people. If
they will not stop the arms shipment, the people of Greece and the people
of the world must stop it for them!

The PFLP salutes the Greek people - your unconditional solidarity and your
mass demonstrations in support of the Palestinian people have sent a
strong and powerful message of support, combined with aid, volunteers, and
action on the ground. Your own courageous struggles for justice have
inspired us and people around the world.

We are calling upon:

1. All Greek companies and all shipping companies to refuse to carry any
shipment of arms to Israel. Any shipping company who carries these weapons
has the blood of the people of Gaza on its hands!

2. Greek workers and all port workers to refuse to load the cargo for any
shipment of arms to Israel. The strong hands of Greek workers and Greek
labor should not be sullied with this dangerous cargo!

3. The Greek government to prohibit the use of its port to ship arms to
the occupation state massacring our people!

4. The Greek people, the Greek movement, and all international and
progressive forces to take action to stop any such shipment from loading
or leaving the port of Astakos!

The PFLP is calling for your continuing unconditional solidarity and
support to prevent the U.S. and Israel from using the land and ports of
the Greek people a supply base for occupation, massacres, and crimes.

The Greek people have a proud history and present of struggle. The
relationship between the Arab people and the Greek people is strong and
powerful and we call upon you today to march with us once again toward
victory and justice for the Palestinian people and block this arms
shipment!

Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
January 10, 2009
 
Not to get too far off topic, and not contradicting VP's basic point, but it is my understanding that synagogues were in existance while the temple worship still continued (until around 60AD).

Yep, but they were quite different beasts, probably a good analogy would be between "smells and bells" Anglicanism and a weird Quaker/methodist hybrid. Temple worship was the province of the elite, and didn't exactly feed the spiritual hunger of pre-Diaspora Jewry (hence the 57 varieties of sects that sprang up).
 
yes there were.

basically in talmudic palestine, society was quite divided, among the jews there were two classes of people - the "am haaretz" (workers/peasants etc) and a small minority of highly educated rabbinic scholars - who regarded the am haaretz with absolute contempt, thinking they were stupid, illiterate etc

as well as there being other sects such as samaritans etc

not meaning to generalise but i think this division was one of the factors that led to the establishment of synagogues in palestine before the exile of the jews - the ordinary people in the countryside could not easily make the long trips to jerusalem for sacrifices etc, and they were not given a warm welcome when they did manage to attend, so it became a once-yearly event - or even less frequent than that

maybe vp or someone can explain this a bit better than i can ... but this is basically what i remember from reading about it ages ago ..

I think you've explained it better than me. :)
 
As you admit here, Jewish culture was most certainly not "formed in diaspora." It developed in diaspora, but it was formed in Israel.
Culture is fluid, it hybridises even in relatively closed societies. Some of it was formed in Israel, some in Diaspora, some of it developed and hybridised before Diaspora, some after.
I'd be interested to know whether, as a Jew, you agree with Laptop that diaspora is also "where it belongs."
That depends what you mean when you talk about "Jewish culture".
My personal opinion is that as much of our non-religious culture was either formed or developed almost beyond recognition of the original source in the Diaspora, that it's more at home in the place it evolved. Herzl and his cronies thought so, which was why they took a position of "re-making" an Israel devoid of much of that culture.
As for the religious culture, I'm no more qualified than any non-rabbinical Jewish adult to comment on that.
 
Back
Top Bottom