I suspect that many, if not all, of the names in the Dickens dossier are those that were published in Scallywag although this, of course, does not mean that all, or indeed any, of them are actually true (Elbows - can you help here? All my Scallywags are stored away at the moment and I don't have access to them. Eta - obviously not asking you to mention the actual names).
I've never actually had access to physical copies of Scallyway. But a bunch of us on the forum, quite some time ago, discussed the various Scallywag things in as much depth as we could, and I was able to read a shitload of the articles in digital form.
It's impossible to answer the question properly because we don't know which cases were discussed in the dossier(s). But if we assume that the Elm guest house stuff was a focus of it then no, going by Scallywag articles and the stuff that has been the focus in recent years, there is surprisingly little direct overlap between the two. Disregarding the more scurrilous Scallywag stuff, and sticking to their story that apparently actually involved detailed testimony from victims, the picture appeared to involve the transport of victims from, for example, North Wales children's homes, to a location in London. Whereas the Elm guest house stuff was more of a purely London affair, and the alleged perpetrators didn't have that much overlap either, at least not directly according to the limited info available.
In the post-Savile shitstorm I saw one thing in the media that may well have been directly related to the most specific, credible and detailed Scallywag accusation - a video interview (perhaps by Sky News) of an apparent victim, giving details about being transported to London to be abused at parties.
As with Watergate, it now appears that the increasingly unconvincing Brittan and the equally unconvincing Home Office line about lost files is becoming the story rather than the actual contents of the dossier.
There are a couple of things that are almost certainly going on right now, and a few others that might be adding fuel to the fire:
The campaign to get loads of MPs to support an over-arching inquiry thinks it has done well in recent days, pushing the agenda towards this aspect rather than naming names etc.
Others, including various media and journalists, are more interested in the potential of recent events to lead to the naming of one or more people, and close one of the stupidly wide gaps between what some people have been talking about on the internet for years, and what can be said by mainstream media etc.
A gradual loss of faith in police etc investigations bringing any living politicians to justice as more time passes is another factor, and applying pressure to ensure this stuff doesn't go away with a whimper is also a factor.
The way the McApline stuff blew up and backfired is also a factor, both in terms of some being cautious and restrained this time, the build up of pressure that such restraint leads to, amplified by the amount of time that the press were left with nothing to get their teeth into to keep the stories alive in the wake of the McAlpine mess.
Slightly more generally, I feel that an additional factor in the lack of bringing political offenders to justice, beyond the obvious potential for coverup, intimidation, legal threats etc, has been a lack of critical mass of victims. For various reasons, not enough victims have come forwards to make arrests of high-profile political figures a completely unavoidable no-brainer. Due to the number of factors that can lead to this, including all the usual reasons a victim may not want to go through this all again before we even get to additional factors caused by the perpetrators being connected and powerful, its hard to say exactly what this means.
I might tentatively suggest that one other reason is that contrary to some hyperbole, we arent actually looking at a very large network of high-profile offenders and a vast number of victims. If true that is no less reason to go after those who did abuse in my book, but it is part of the picture of relative legal inaction so far. Just look at the celebrity cases that the CPS decided were worth charging - given a lack of hard evidence and the amount of time that had passed since the alleged crimes, they went for cases where there were numerous victims and recurring patterns of abuse, partially backed up by evidence such as letters to or from victims and their families. But going by detailed reporting by the likes of Exaro, so far I am only aware of two victims of the Elm guest house stuff having contact with the police.
Should be able to spot them by the tinfoil adverts they carry. Even more annoyingly, if you strip out 80% of the false connections, leaps and outright lizardry (and no doubt some false positives), they probably contain the bare bones of the story. 
Laying siege to a shop that sold occult paraphernalia! That was at the peak of the Satanic hysteria. 
