Barking_Mad
Non sibi sed omnibus
It's as if MI5 didn't bother to vet Jimmy Savile. Or if they did they were completely incompetent, or didnt care.
Daily Express, 2nd September 1983
"The Home Office is currently investigating allegations that PIE received public funds from the Government while James Callaghan was in Downing Street.Didn't Jim Callaghan come down hard on "PIE"?
The Home Office is currently investigating allegations that PIE received public funds from the Government while James Callaghan was in Downing Street.
It has been claimed that tens of thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money was funnelled to it via the Voluntary Services Unit (VSU), a department of the Home Office that gave annual grants to charities and non-profit-making lobby groups.
The probe comes after a whistle-blower had claimed the payments were signed off, over several years, by a senior civil servant who worked under Labour’s then Home Secretary, Merlyn Rees. http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/jack-dromey-fury-paedophile-links-6407122
In answer to the OP question, an alarmingly increasing amount
Search Google:
“Leon Brittan Jason Swift”
“Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe.”
“Leon Brittan Pie”
“In response to a legal request submitted to Google, we have removed 2 result(s) from this page.”
“Leon Brittan rumours”
“In response to a legal request submitted to Google, we have removed 1 result(s) from this page.”
“Leon Brittan Jimmy Savile”
“Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe”
“Leon Brittan Cyril Smith”
“In response to a legal request submitted to Google, we have removed 4 result(s) from this page.”
“Leon Brittan scandal”
“In response to a legal request submitted to Google, we have removed 2 result(s) from this page.”
Can get results for both those searches. Though i do live in Scotland
that roughly sums up my thoughts, or at least as far as i think it's legally advisable to post them...
I'm not going to link to the sites where I read this, cos some looked a bit Icke-y, but has anyone else seen claims that Special Branch were 'running' P.I.E. as a means to blackmail its members? The comparison made was with Kincora, where that definitely was going on (secret services allowing the boys' home abuse to continue so that they could get juicy blackmail data on Unionists ).Daily Express, 2nd September 1983
Me too!the saville/sutcliffe thing is fucking with my head.
Me too!
Mind you, contrary to some of the more wild blogs I've seen, I don't think it has any wider significance - I've read stuff saying that Savile was questioned during the Ripper enquiry, and that one of the Ripper's murder victims was found near Savile's home in Leeds...but these are nothing more than coincidence IMHO. If Savile 'bonded' with Sutcliffe in Broadmoor it might have been cos they were both from Yorkshire ...and perhaps Savile felt a secret affinity with someone else guilty of horrific sex crimes?
Let's hope so...... This one could really have a long and dramatic way to unravel.
Sounds unlikely to me tbh. What would have stopped Sutcliffe from talking, if this had been the case? He had already told police and his brother that he had done most, but not all, of the murders with which he was charged...if he was concerned about accuracy and possibly lessening his guilt, surely he would have said he'd been directed to do it. It sounds a bit 'From Hell'/Stephen Knight to me - Jack the Ripper's victims being murdered, cos they knew too much about royal/Masonic wrongdoings...suggestion on another thread that maybe he knew sutcliffe prior to sutcliffes arrest and directed him to kill a few who knew too much about sex rings etc.
I'm not going to link to the sites where I read this, cos some looked a bit Icke-y, but has anyone else seen claims that Special Branch were 'running' P.I.E. as a means to blackmail its members?
They probably don't see themselves like that. They probably (wild speculation ON) see themselves as the protectors of a greater good, which should not be allowed to be derailed or damaged by a few slightly iffy encounters or the exercise of some curious peccadilloes: best let sleeping dogs lie, after all it's not like anyone's going to believe some kind over a senior Government official, or anything. And we couldn't prove it anyway. It'll all blow over, no harm done.the overwhelming stink of complicity in covering up child abuse. Fuck me sideways, we always knew they were rotten but now its almost beyond doubt that we're being run by nonce enablers.
Blimey, it's as if the Daily Express used to be a serious paper, or something. Nowadays, they'd have mentioned Diana, giant killer rats and a six week heatwave in the first para.Daily Express, 2nd September 1983