SlideshowBob
Active Member
Oh, I'm with you. I liked this one too, presenting losing one of your five seats and a reduction in your percentage of the vote as some kind of triumph (((Willie Rennie))).
Scottish Lib Dem leader Willie Rennie: "We have had some astonishing constituency results, with almost half the vote in Shetland, more in Orkney and North East Fife and the highest vote for any constituency since the formation of the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh Western. It is frustrating that we weren’t able to move the dial in other constituencies and on the regional lists.
There's an argument they were only really particularly strong in some of their constituency seats as well because of the obvious tactical vote switches. For a lot of unionists they were the easy switch vote - not as toxic as the Tories for Labour supporters, and not as "left" as Labour for Tory backers. At this point it's basically a bunch of independent unionists who are fairly strong on localism more than a coherent national political party. Their branding is relatively inoffensive and on some stuff they do okay, but there's little to differentiate them from Labour for the most part, and most of the electorate have basically given up on them in constituencies they don't already hold. If they lose any of their current four in future, wouldn't be surprising to see Labour/Tories become the main opposition party - as was the in 2017 UK election when some former Lib Dem strongholds from before 2015 suddenly had the Tories as the main challengers to the SNP.