So...if it's possible that we could move on from the mire...bella will be lucky to see 45% of the funding it asked for, cs does not seem to publish figures but I doubt the picture is much better. (google was my only friend for cs, I can stand to be corrected and I hope they get the funding to continue, which they probably will but I've no figures)
Bella will not fold. £20k is certainly enough to run a website. But last year bella got £53k from crowd-funding, this year it'll see £24k max...a huge drop. In context wings has had about £350k funding in the last 3 years and got double it's crowdfunding request this year, £40k requested and £80k plus donated.
These sites are funded, in the vast majority, by the middle class, working and poor people of Scotland.
Now the thing is...bella does more 'perceived' scottishness than wings or other relevant sites. Language, history, interviews. Tartan and heather are prominent. The politics lean left, as they should up here. (There are no pro-indy right-leaning sites.) But bella is the most scottish in certain senses.
Why aren't they getting the funding the got last year?