teqniq
DisMembered
Engineer on site of huge London flat fire in case of building collapseLooks like the fire it still pretty vigorous, wonder what the chance of structural collapse is?
Engineer on site of huge London flat fire in case of building collapseLooks like the fire it still pretty vigorous, wonder what the chance of structural collapse is?
About half an hour ago the Fire Brigade said this wasn't yet a concern, and firecrew were still inside, however I see flames have just appeared again on one side of the buildingLooks like the fire it still pretty vigorous, wonder what the chance of structural collapse is?
It'll be fine, the CIA haven't been anywhere near it!Looks like the fire it still pretty vigorous, wonder what the chance of structural collapse is?
The web page for Harley Facades appears to state they also manufacture but I may not be reading it correctly. However if materials were supplied by Harley Curtain Wall, the company which was wound up, I guess the question would be whether, and to what extent, Harley Facades had acquired their liabilities as well as their assets. As the similar company names imply the same guy is behind both of them.
ETA: a more detailed account of the winding up of Harley Curtain Wall here
Crowborough company goes into administration - Crowborough Life
really don't get the no centralised fire alarm system
really don't get the no centralised fire alarm system
No. And just one stairwell for the whole tower.
Me neither in a block of this height. I suppose you could argue that having everyone's alarm go off every time someone burns their toast would be a real pain but still.
Expect a lot of company directors fucking off to sunny climes before it gets too hot for their liking at home!
not "post war" 1974!Well that's just the design of an old building. Unfortunately when a lot of these blocks were built post-war there was little consideration to fire or insulation etc. Obviously there are things that can be done later but additional stairwells is not one of them.
Well that's just the design of an old building. Unfortunately when a lot of these blocks were built post-war there was little consideration to fire or insulation etc. Obviously there are things that can be done later but additional stairwells is not one of them.
Thats not what centralised alarm system does. Fire starts on 4th floor, they should have an alarm available that will alert everyone in building that they can activate, the lack of one is almost certainly criminal!Me neither in a block of this height. I suppose you could argue that having everyone's alarm go off every time someone burns their toast would be a real pain but still.
Where I am - admittedly a tiny building by comparison - each flat has its own internal smoke/fire alarms, which are not connected to anyone else's. Then there's a communal fire alarm that covers the shared areas / stairwell. So you can burn toast with impunity, it only sets off the communal stuff if the smoke makes it out of an individual flat.Me neither in a block of this height. I suppose you could argue that having everyone's alarm go off every time someone burns their toast would be a real pain but still.
Not a smoke alarm but a fire alarm to alert the whole building.Me neither in a block of this height. I suppose you could argue that having everyone's alarm go off every time someone burns their toast would be a real pain but still.
not "post war" 1974!
E2A According to V Derbyshire an hour ago.
Thats not what centralised alarm system does. Fire starts on 4th floor, they should have an alarm available that will alert everyone in building that they can activate, the lack of one is almost certainly criminal!
Where I am - admittedly a tiny building by comparison - each flat has its own internal smoke/fire alarms, which are not connected to anyone else's. Then there's a communal fire alarm that covers the shared areas / stairwell. So you can burn toast with impunity, it only sets off the communal stuff if the smoke makes it out of an individual flat.
You don't say.This has already got the feeling of multiple fuck-ups.
Barwell is unfit for any public office.
This is a very political matter, and we may now partly be seeing the results of decisions where the deciders just didn't care enough. I know the guy who runs London Federation of Housing Co-ops, which includes TMOs (Tenant Management Orgs). For those who don't know, a TMO is similar to a co-op in that it is a democratic structure, but a housing co-op owns its own properties, while a TMO just has a management arrangement. He told me a couple of years ago that everyone who is a fan of co-ops and TMOs thought (and tried to tell) K&C that they were fucking up by putting ALL their properties into the same TMO. A simple democratic structure like that would be appropriate for one block or maybe a few next to each other. The idea you can maintain genuine democratic control when you put all the borough's property in one TMO is absurd. You could try to create some federated structure I suppose, but they didn't. So they ended up with something that was meant to be democratically controlled by couldn't be, thereby losing both the full council oversight and the democratic advantage of TMOs. Basically the democratic element was tokenism - the borough didn't care that it wouldn't work.No, it doesn't sound like the residents were happy with the work being done. from the kctmo website - "KCTMO is managed by a Board of Directors comprising of eight elected tenant and leaseholder members, four appointed Councillor members and three independent appointed other members."
Who are the 3 independent board members?
fucking horrific.