Steel Icarus
ersatz maven
This chap on BBC live giving tons of info.
Appreciate you're just passing on the message, but is there any word (or any way of finding out) how long they'll be open? I have a couple of coats at work that I'd been saving for the annual coat collection in November, but could run them along this evening if they'd be of use.Copied from Mrs Magpie:
Attention West London people!
The residents who escaped Grenfell House only have the clothes they stand up in, mainly nightclothes at that. There is an urgent need for clothes to fit all ages, toiletries, toys etc. Please take donations to
St Clement's Church.
95 Sirdar Road,
London,
W11 4EQ
Cut and pasted to facebook.Copied from Mrs Magpie:
Attention West London people!
The residents who escaped Grenfell House only have the clothes they stand up in, mainly nightclothes at that. There is an urgent need for clothes to fit all ages, toiletries, toys etc. Please take donations to
St Clement's Church.
95 Sirdar Road,
London,
W11 4EQ
It is political. Effective safety regimes and preventative, responsive emergency services need to be well resourced. If something like this happens, it's because of these things being poorly resourced & funded - there's a reason why it looks like third world shit.At the risk of bringing politics into it, would that have anything to do with cuts to the fire services from a few years back?
Just seen this is all over Twitter, will try and get some details from thereAppreciate you're just passing on the message, but is there any word (or any way of finding out) how long they'll be open? I have a couple of coats at work that I'd been saving for the annual coat collection in November, but could run them along this evening if they'd be of use.
Have also shared on Facebook, hopefully others can help.
In a recent door-knocking survey carried out by concerned Grenfell Tower residents we found that 39% of households had not had the HIU work done and we believe that approx 46 households are actively resisting work being carried out as currently planned.
We are also aware that a significant number of residents who have allowed the work to be done are not satisfied with the standard of the work delivered by Rydon and many claim they felt bullied into having the work done by the TMO in the first place.
That's the rain screen - as that page also says
The descriptions of the work by the architects and the contractors refer to external insulation being fitted as well as these aluminium panels.
Coincidently there was a program on Radio 4 yesterday where they were at a fire testing station and they described the testing of cladding, it appears very thorough and it's hard to believe something flammable would get past that test.Mind you according to the Guardian the manufacturer of the cladding has gone out of business.Terrible scenes. I can't imagine anything more terrifying.
As someone who used to work in external cladding / facades I'm struggling to understand what has happened here. No cladding panel is combustible and there should have been firestopping at every floor level. Being an old building the internal firestopping would have been basic in all likelihood.
The bottom line is that this sort of thing should never happen, any fire should not have spread at this speed and ferocity.
As it says in the link the rain screen is a system; it includes cladding panels, insulation, windows and er... fire barriers. The external panels are ACM.
Terrible scenes. I can't imagine anything more terrifying.
As someone who used to work in external cladding / facades I'm struggling to understand what has happened here. No cladding panel is combustible and there should have been firestopping at every floor level. Being an old building the internal firestopping would have been basic in all likelihood.
The bottom line is that this sort of thing should never happen, any fire should not have spread at this speed and ferocity.
Coincidently there was a program on Radio 4 yesterday where they were at a fire testing station and they described the testing of cladding, it appears very thorough and it's hard to believe something flammable would get past that test.Mind you according to the Guardian the manufacturer of the cladding has gone out of business.
I think they've got the dates wrong - looks to me as if the company which supplied these materials had bought out the one which went into receivership before this contract began.Mind you according to the Guardian the manufacturer of the cladding has gone out of business.
It's an ALMO (Arms Length Management Organisation) set up by the Council which - I think uniquely - has adopted the legal form of a TMO (Tenant's Management Organisation). Actual tenant control of the organisation appears to be minimal however. I'm a little curious myself about exactly how they've structured this, but it's not a tenant run organisation in any meaningful sense.This KCTMO, how does that work? it's run by the tennants themselves but it's also a private company?
it didn't take long tbf. Someone is responsible for this and they allowed the building to be a fire risk. So people are dead or homeless so some cunt could have a few more quid in their pocket.It is political. Effective safety regimes and preventative, responsive emergency services need to be well resourced. If something like this happens, it's because of these things being poorly resourced & funded - there's a reason why it looks like third world shit.
The more you read & think about this, the more shock turns to rage tbh.
Like i said earlier a stay put policy is only appropriate if there are other fire control measures in place. To tell people to stay put, in a building that can be totally engulfed in fire within an hour is negligent beyond belief, and it makes me wonder whether the stay put policy was put in place to save money on an integrated alarm system!with the "Stay put" policy there aren't audible alarms to trigger an evacuation.
It almost certainly isn't!No central alarm system, no sprinkler system and only one staircase. How the fuck is that legal?
Horrific
I think they've got the dates wrong - looks to me as if the company which supplied these materials had bought out the one which went into receivership before this contract began.