maomao
普費斯
Interesting flag.
Interesting flag.
How is the discussion whether communities should be standing up against fash mobs going?
No, 1949.
Actually, no, I suspect people had learned a few lessons about opposing facsm then.
Interesting flag.
Maybe not confused at all; could be quite deliberate.They seem a bit confused.
Maybe not confused at all; could be quite deliberate.
No idea if they are behind the idea of national anarchism but there is such a thing.They seem a bit confused.
I would doubt it. They are probably just politically naive, using a vaguely remembered symbol from an incompletely understood past.No idea if they are behind the idea of national anarchism but there is such a thing.
A crowd of white men and boys expressing inchoate ideas violently because their togetherness gives them a sense of invulnerability and the dynamism of the scene gives them the excuse not to think about the consequences of their actions or the impact upon others.
Wiuld be my guess tooI would doubt it. They are probably just politically naive, using a vaguely remembered symbol from an incompletely understood past.
Could ask this lotI’d really like to hear from some Urbanites with policing experience on this tbh. Rotherham looks terrifying at the moment. I have no idea how the situation would develop at the holiday inn if there were equal numbers of anti-fascist activists or communitarian self-defence groups involved, but the police look woefully overstretched.
Still not inclined to believe that a ruck between members of the public would help a robust emergency service response. Very perturbed to see that there doesn’t seem to be one.
A crowd of white men and boys expressing inchoate ideas violently because their togetherness gives them a sense of invulnerability and the dynamism of the scene gives them the excuse not to think about the consequences of their actions or the impact upon others.
A crowd of white men and boys expressing inchoate ideas violently because their togetherness gives them a sense of invulnerability and the dynamism of the scene gives them the excuse not to think about the consequences of their actions or the impact upon others.
They seem a bit confused.
Not to say na's aren't confusedNo idea if they are behind the idea of national anarchism but there is such a thing.
That's offside.
There are definitely women there, even in that photo. They might be in much smaller numbers, but there've been several women involved with these racist riots. (Mostly pretty young from what I've been seeing from pictures and videos online.)A crowd of white men and boys expressing inchoate ideas violently because their togetherness gives them a sense of invulnerability and the dynamism of the scene gives them the excuse not to think about the consequences of their actions or the impact upon others.
A perfect summation. The flag adds to the inchoateness.
You managed that in one sentence, well done.
There are definitely women there, even in that photo. They might be in much smaller numbers, but there've been several women involved with these racist riots. (Mostly pretty young from what I've been seeing from pictures and videos online.)
That's offside.
Don't out people for their jobs. Bad form.
That's offside.
Don't out people for their jobs. Bad form.
Over and over again the BBC people are going out of their way to say how we mustn't discredit the whole idea of 'protesting against immigration' just because of these few isolated incidents.