Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Out in 18 months
Out in 18 months
er climate protestors "have been jailed for telling juries why they were protesting" - Judge Silas Reid presidingSavagery from a Judge in Plymouth:
Judge Robert Linford then rounded on Cann telling him that according to his police interview he discussed with them "about the better use of taxpayers' money and why people were having to pay to keep these people in this country after committing such heinous crimes. "
etc
(3 year jail sentence for Cann)
Maybe it is in this moment and more than fuck 'em, they need to be confronted, physically or otherwise. They need to be stopped for all sorts of reasons, including the risk of serious injury and death among their targets. But 'fuck 'em' is an end of conversation, it just leaves them as the monsters, away from liberal society. 'Fuck 'em' doesn't take us anywhere better.I think fuck em is a reasonable response.
Parole at 50% of sentence is usually for first time offenders showing remorse. He has many convictions and doesn't seem to be expressing regret.Out in 18 months
Judge said min term 50% of sentence. Many people will serve 40%. The great majority will be out for Halloween 2025 and pretty much all those sentences thus far for Xmas 25Parole at 50% of sentence is usually for first time offenders showing remorse. He has many convictions and doesn't seem to be expressing regret.
Yeah 50% would usually be the maximum discount, but not guaranteed. It will also depend on prisoner's behaviour, whether they are first time offenders and if they express remorse to parole board.Judge said min term 50% of sentence. Many people will serve 40%. The great majority will be out for Halloween 2025 and pretty much all those sentences thus far for Xmas 25
60% is quite standard now according to the governmentYeah 50% would usually be the maximum discount, but not guaranteed. It will also depend on prisoner's behaviour, whether they are first time offenders and if they express remorse to parole board.
Judgey McJudgeface said:So let's look at how the taxpayer have been funding your activities over the last 38 years - let's see what you've cost the country: you've got 10 aliases, four fictitious birth dates, you're 51 years of age, you've been convicted of 170 offences, you been convicted of theft, arson, taking cars, handling stolen goods, obtaining by deception, burglary, dangerous driving and possessing bladed articles. In all over the years that you've been visiting the criminal justice system you've received sentences totalling 357 months in prison, many of them concurrent.
In other words, nearly 30 years. That ... is what you've been costing this country, and you sit there in that interview and saw fit to be critical of others. You have no right whatever to say who should or should not be in this country.
Interesting to compare that with this:
A man has been jailed just four days after he threw rocks and bricks at police during violent disorder in Liverpool city centre on Saturday (3 August).
Liam Riley, 41, of Walton Road, Liverpool, was at the junction of Whitechapel and Church Street when he approached officers waving his arms aggressively at them.
He fell when officers ran towards the group he was with and he was arrested at the scene.
Tonight, he will begin a 20 month prison sentence after pleading guilty violent disorder and racially aggravated threatening behaviour.
60% is quite standard now according to the government
We've been handed a lot of flannel but it doesn't apply to violent crimes with sentences of 4 years plus, hence few people if any sentenced thus farThe spiel we were given was that it wouldn't apply to violent crimes and they've been convicted of violent disorder.
I don't know if this is the right thread for this. But I've just had a rather disturbing conversation with my flat mate. After venting to me about the crappy treatment he was getting a the hands of the DWP, he went on to be agitated about "two tier policing" and claiming that there are videos of "Muslims" with big poles and machetes being given favourable treatment by the police, including one video showing these guys following mounted police when they charged the "English protesters". He seems to think that the police are being told to treat "the Muslims" with kid gloves. He further claimed that the media is suppressing the evidence of these things by not showing them.
I've never seen any of these videos. I feel like he's plugged into an alternate pipeline for news and views of these events. It was really quite disturbing. What the hell is going on?
He's clearly down a rabbit hole.I don't know if this is the right thread for this. But I've just had a rather disturbing conversation with my flat mate. After venting to me about the crappy treatment he was getting a the hands of the DWP, he went on to be agitated about "two tier policing" and claiming that there are videos of "Muslims" with big poles and machetes being given favourable treatment by the police, including one video showing these guys following mounted police when they charged the "English protesters". He seems to think that the police are being told to treat "the Muslims" with kid gloves. He further claimed that the media is suppressing the evidence of these things by not showing them.
I've never seen any of these videos. I feel like he's plugged into an alternate pipeline for news and views of these events. It was really quite disturbing. What the hell is going on?
He's clearly down a rabbit hole.
I don't know if this is the right thread for this. But I've just had a rather disturbing conversation with my flat mate. After venting to me about the crappy treatment he was getting a the hands of the DWP, he went on to be agitated about "two tier policing" and claiming that there are videos of "Muslims" with big poles and machetes being given favourable treatment by the police, including one video showing these guys following mounted police when they charged the "English protesters". He seems to think that the police are being told to treat "the Muslims" with kid gloves. He further claimed that the media is suppressing the evidence of these things by not showing them.
I've never seen any of these videos. I feel like he's plugged into an alternate pipeline for news and views of these events. It was really quite disturbing. What the hell is going on?
Judge savagely puts 10 names Plymouth rioter in his placeThis belongs in a song
It's too long for a t-shirt, tragically
'Chanting' Rotherham riot dad's Aldi meat shop lands him behind bars[Defence brief] Mr Adams told the court: "Can I perhaps urge My Lord a little restraint in as much as this. The defendant's intention that day had been no more than to visit Aldi, which joins the hotel, with his partner, and seeing the demonstration he made the foolish error of deciding to go and have a look.
"What was first a look became a protracted stay. His partner had the good sense to move away, and he of course remained at the scene... It was simply to buy a piece of meat for dinner. That, he accepts, he was caught up in it."
SAUSAGE WATCH #3: Trevor Lloyd
View attachment 438182
'Chanting' Rotherham riot dad's Aldi meat shop lands him behind bars
It was simply to buy a piece of meat for dinner.
"With a nice Chianti""What is the charge? Eating a meal? A succulent Chinese meal?",
to be fair trying to set a hotel on fire with people inside it is pretty much up there on the dreadful side of thingsNot like those dreadful people in Rotherham.
Holy fuck monkeys! That is mind-blowingly good.Judge savagely puts 10 names Plymouth rioter in his place
I fed the story to A.I and asked it to give something indy pop with bits of folk
with a singalong bit Its quite catchy after a couple of plays
"Your 51 years marked by a trail of crime , Yet you dare to question, who should be in line
You've got 10 aliases, and a criminal history wide ,Your actions have cost this country, there's nowhere left to hide"
It could be Tommy Ten Names song too It plays here but not really sure if attaching correctly ?
View attachment 438181
Have you ever read Ionesco's Rhinoceros? It's about people you think you know, turning into something you wish they hadn't.I don't know if this is the right thread for this. But I've just had a rather disturbing conversation with my flat mate. After venting to me about the crappy treatment he was getting a the hands of the DWP, he went on to be agitated about "two tier policing" and claiming that there are videos of "Muslims" with big poles and machetes being given favourable treatment by the police, including one video showing these guys following mounted police when they charged the "English protesters". He seems to think that the police are being told to treat "the Muslims" with kid gloves. He further claimed that the media is suppressing the evidence of these things by not showing them.
I've never seen any of these videos. I feel like he's plugged into an alternate pipeline for news and views of these events. It was really quite disturbing. What the hell is going on?
Wait for him to climb back out? Depends on how deep he is in. Some will slowly see sense. One thing I imagine would be quite useful is not necessarily challenging the content but talking to him instead about rabbit holes, grifters, and how it’s so easy to see just one side. He might then get the sense, after he’s served his 100th video of shite, that the medium is often the problem not the message. But if I was in that situation is stepping away, sticking to your guns, and giving him the space to find his own way. The problem is that so much content is emotional satisfying it’s boring and annoying for someone to climb out. The kick from charged video after charged video…I don't know if this is the right thread for this. But I've just had a rather disturbing conversation with my flat mate. After venting to me about the crappy treatment he was getting a the hands of the DWP, he went on to be agitated about "two tier policing" and claiming that there are videos of "Muslims" with big poles and machetes being given favourable treatment by the police, including one video showing these guys following mounted police when they charged the "English protesters". He seems to think that the police are being told to treat "the Muslims" with kid gloves. He further claimed that the media is suppressing the evidence of these things by not showing them.
I've never seen any of these videos. I feel like he's plugged into an alternate pipeline for news and views of these events. It was really quite disturbing. What the hell is going on?