Lord Camomile
Yipchaa!
They were the best penalty takers in training, apparently. Don't know about Saka and Sancho, but Rashford has a proven track record too, and arguably did everything right (in that he sent Donnarumma the wrong way), except, y'know, a couple of inches off target (which yes, arguably is the most important bit...).Still fuming at that penalty selection to be honest. It looks stupider and stupider in the cold light of day.
I really, really, really hope he didn't pick them to make some kind of political point that has now backfired dreadfully but the suspicion is there.
It was Southgate's pick apparently, not volunteers.
As others on this thread have pointed out, who else was there and on what criteria would you be picking them? I mean, it certainly doesn't sit comfortably with me having players so young taking the most important penalties in our nation's history, but in terms of "good at taking penalties" Henderson missed his last one (and SI said has only ever taken one for Liverpool?), Grealish likewise doesn't take many.
Maybe that doesn't matter, and Southgate shouldn't have put three young men in such a pressure situation, and arguably three black men in the potential firing line, but trusting the players that he believes are the best penalty takers..? There's been far worse reasons to pick players.