editor
hiraethified
Oh for fuck's sake.Then why is it ok to kill vegetables? Are they not alive?
Oh for fuck's sake.Then why is it ok to kill vegetables? Are they not alive?
You've just described all food if your aim is to stay alive. In the west, no one needs to eat meat to live though. It's a choice. People can live perfectly healthy lives with zero meat and impact a whole lot less on the environment.I also enjoy it because that's a biological necessity.
And yet you provide no counter argumentOh for fuck's sake.
Yes, people can enjoy eating all sorts of food because we are programmed to receive a pleasurable sensation from foods we enjoy.You've just described all food if your aim is to stay alive. In the west, no one needs to eat meat to live though. It's a choice. People can live perfectly healthy lives with zero meat and impact a whole lot less on the environment.
It is not a biological necessityi eat food because it's healthy. That's what informs my diet. I also enjoy it because that's a biological necessity. There are foods I cannot stomach that are healthy so yes 'pleasure' in a practical sense is required. But it is not the focus or the goal. I think you're using the word incorrectly.
You're not listening.It is not a biological necessity
there are plenty of people as living proof
will you concede that?
Ah, with no facts to back you up, it's now all down to 'belief' like a belief in God, pixies and UFOs.You missed the point: i believe animal produce to be the optimal source of nutrition.
'Studies have linked higher intakes of red meat consumption to higher risk of heart disease’, says Victoria Taylor, chief dietitian with the British Heart Foundation (BHF).
A number of large scale studies have linked non-meat eaters to longer lives and the Blue Zones project, which studies the diets of the world’s longest lived people such as the Japanese in Okinawa and Sardinians in Italy shows they thrive on plant-based, low or no-meat diets.
Last month the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) concluded red meat consumption was strongly linked to the development of colorectal cancer – the fourth most common cancer in the UK - and that by eating no more than 500 grams a week of cooked beef, lamb or pork we could considerably lower our risk.
The truth about meat, according to scientistsOne study from Tufts University in Massachussetts published in last April analysed studies 120,000 people’s diets over 16 years and found large intakes of red meat were associated with weight gain while replacing red meat with yoghurt, seafood and nuts led to weight loss.
No you didn't. Stop wriggling.You're not listening.
I said enjoying food is a biological necessity
I stopped feeding scooby ages ago. Clearly a fraud.Member since Tuesday. #15 on a thread that was started last july. CrabbedOne has a contender. I suggest feeding him less snacks. No more snacks for this radge basturt!
View attachment 126753
T'is fun to kick the buffoon around from time to time though. I think he ight even believe the drivel he posts up because a proper troll wouldn't have to make anywhere near as much effort.I stopped feeding scooby ages ago. Clearly a fraud.
Is that aimed at me? You seriously posted this? Aren't there some kids playing ball outside you could be phoning the council about? Creepy mohtherfucker!Member since Tuesday. #15 on a thread that was started last july. CrabbedOne has a contender. I suggest feeding him less snacks. No more snacks for this radge basturt!
View attachment 126753
I can't find a link to the study you're referring to in that article, published by a tabloid. Please cite a source diretly.Ah, with no facts to back you up, it's now all down to 'belief' like a belief in God, pixies and UFOs.
A meat heavy diet is not the optimum anything. A balanced diet is, and that can be achieved without meat.
The truth about meat, according to scientists
That is exactly what I said, and subsequently clarified as you know since you are responding to me doing so, which just makes you dishonest.No you didn't. Stop wriggling.
You mean like the effort to link to a tabloid article and not the direct source for the claim you're making?T'is fun to kick the buffoon around from time to time though. I think he ight even believe the drivel he posts up because a proper troll wouldn't have to make anywhere near as much effort.
tbh, I don't really know what motivates a proper troll and what lengths they go to. As soon as it was clear that scooby was a piss take just here to pick a fight and talk bare shite, I switched off.T'is fun to kick the buffoon around from time to time though. I think he ight even believe the drivel he posts up because a proper troll wouldn't have to make anywhere near as much effort.
Because by definition a vegan diet requires supplementation. I wasn't arguing for a balanced diet, was that not clear. I'm sure you could find a thread more to your liking elsewhere. I'm nit here to give you an eco chamber"Arguing for a balanced diet, which you don't eat as a vegan anyway, is just a fallacy."
Evidence your claim.
But seriously, how do you know Editor doesn't eat a balanced diet? You've admitted it's possible to get a range, a balance of nutriants with out eating meat. You love chucking around pseudo debate club rules and complaints, whilst repeatidly breaking them yourself. It's fucking boring anyway.
Balanced diet is not what this thread's about anyway. Many meat eaters don't eat a balanced diet, so far as the term is understood.
The article links directly to several sources you stupid, stupid, boy.I can't find a link to the study you're referring to in that article, published by a tabloid. Please cite a source diretly.
If you're genuinely interested there's loads on places on the interwebs where you can find support.Is there a general thread on Urban where one can find information and maybe get support about eating less or no meat? This thread's a fucking joke now
was thinking of starting one in suburban for that very reason and that it wouldn't be dicked about so much on but worried the usual suspects would still wreck itIs there a general thread on Urban where one can find information and maybe get support about eating less or no meat? This thread's a fucking joke now
was thinking of starting one in suburban for that very reason and that it wouldn't be dicked about so much on but worried the usual suspects would still wreck it
Why do you care so much anyway? You've offered nothing except saying you think meat is more convenient source of certain nutrients for you. Vegans aren't making their case based on convenience.Because by definition a vegan diet requires supplementation. I wasn't arguing for a balanced diet, was that not clear. I'm sure you could find a thread more to your liking elsewhere. I'm nit here to give you an eco chamber
Is there a general thread on Urban where one can find information and maybe get support about eating less or no meat? This thread's a fucking joke now
doneGo on start one I reckon.
This one's for argument stuff. A straight up informational thread shouldn't get trashed. I eat meat but do like other stuff too. Not like I eat meat every day.
Anyone being a nob on those type of threads could be banned off them.
I'll keep a close eye on it.was thinking of starting one in suburban for that very reason and that it wouldn't be dicked about so much on but worried the usual suspects would still wreck it
Great, so instead of your constant passive aggressive sneering bullshit which has been the hallmark of every one of your responses to me, you'll be able to link to one of those claims, which you also could have done here but again chose to piss all over the convo.The article links directly to several sources you stupid, stupid, boy.
Unfortunately, the sort of thing that has happened in this thread is typical. Flesh eaters get shook and go out of their way to trash the topic. It's very predictable. Similarly with youtube comments.