Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Contact Tracing: Will You Self Isolate? (and related discussion)

Will you self isolate if told to by the tracing team?

  • Yes, I will self isolate

    Votes: 89 74.8%
  • No, I won't

    Votes: 12 10.1%
  • Something else

    Votes: 18 15.1%

  • Total voters
    119
Right. So why is the call from the government contact tracers going to tell you to self-isolate rather than tell you you need to be tested (and to self-isolate until then). That would surely get a much higher rate of cooperation as well as being the logical thing to do.
Not just tell you you need to be tested but arrange then and there for the test to be sent out to you.
 
What happened to all the anarchists around here. I thought working for your community, autonomous positive action was the thing. Now it's all but but the government have done xyz… I'm being a bit tongue in cheak but really. Fuck the government. We're all pissed of with the whole shitshow. I just see it as the right thing to do if you get the call.

Not aimed at you Poot, just adding. Obviously for people that would be risking losing their jobs, homes etc I get that. But expecting the government to be your moral guide and influence in this is... Non optimum.
I don't think many/any here are expecting the government to be a moral guide.

Most people, here and elsewhere, have observed the lockdown because they recognise it's the best thing to do, just as most people will self isolate (or even better, get tested) if they are told they have been in significant contact with someone else who has tested positive.

But on purely pragmatic grounds, it's valid to point out than there are some people who don't have the financial security to be able to stop work without support, either during a general lockdown or to quarantine themselves after a contact has tested positive, and if the government doesn't provide such support, the measures won't be as effective as they could be.
 
This was my original point. Apparently the test won't always tell you if you're infected though. That said we need to weigh up the probability and potential damage caused by a false negative versus the potential damage caused by making loads of uninfected people isolate.
Yeah it's a numbers game. What is the best way to get maximum benefit from the system.
 
What happened to all the anarchists around here. I thought working for your community, autonomous positive action was the thing. Now it's all but but the government have done xyz… I'm being a bit tongue in cheak but really. Fuck the government. We're all pissed of with the whole shitshow. I just see it as the right thing to do if you get the call.

Not aimed at you Poot, just adding. Obviously for people that would be risking losing their jobs, homes etc I get that. But expecting the government to be your moral guide and influence in this is... Non optimum.
Oh I know, I know. I wouldn't have expected anything else but it's so WEAK, though. He's been so terrified of offending millionaires that all the advice has been piss weak, no one's been called in to account for their actions, he GOT the disease by being a wishy-washy bellend, and the fact that an old man with a walking frame was raising funds for the NHS and he never thought this was an odd message when people on the frontline didn't even have face masks.

Why on earth, after all that, would anyone trust an app that apparently came from the same source? This is entirely different to the fact that most of us have and will continue to do our bit. Because we are better than that.
 
Oh I know, I know. I wouldn't have expected anything else but it's so WEAK, though. He's been so terrified of offending millionaires that all the advice has been piss weak, no one's been called in to account for their actions, he GOT the disease by being a wishy-washy bellend, and the fact that an old man with a walking frame was raising funds for the NHS and he never thought this was an odd message when people on the frontline didn't even have face masks.

Why on earth, after all that, would anyone trust an app that apparently came from the same source? This is entirely different to the fact that most of us have and will continue to do our bit. Because we are better than that.
Yep. If I'm contacted I'll try to do the right thing, but no way I'm getting the app. Quite simply don't trust them enough. I suspect the app is never going to happen, mind.
 
it's also a way of finding asymptomatic cases, which still may well be the majority of cases. And given that asymptomatic cases test positive, that seems reason enough to offer a test to all those contacted. Surely one of the system's biggest shortcomings thus far wrt transmission has been its inability to identify asymptomatic carriers.
I agree that's important to find asymptomatic cases, so testing all who have been in contact with someone who has tested positive is the way to go.

But until there was/is a way of identifying those people, I don't thinking simply testing anyone and everyone, symptomatic or not, would have been effective.

Which then throws up the question of why it's taken so long to get to this very basic test and trace system running...
 
Yep. If I'm contacted I'll try to do the right thing, but no way I'm getting the app. Quite simply don't trust them enough. I suspect the app is never going to happen, mind.
I won't get the app either. I think if I'm contacted and told to isolate without symptoms I'll get myself tested. If that's negative probably go about things as usual as the only person I get within 2 meters of for any length of time is Mrs Spy anyway.
 
I don't think many/any here are expecting the government to be a moral guide.

Most people, here and elsewhere, have observed the lockdown because they recognise it's the best thing to do, just as most people will self isolate (or even better, get tested) if they are told they have been in significant contact with someone else who has tested positive.

But on purely pragmatic grounds, it's valid to point out than there are some people who don't have the financial security to be able to stop work without support, either during a general lockdown or to quarantine themselves after a contact has tested positive, and if the government doesn't provide such support, the measures won't be as effective as they could be.
Many here may not be, but do not underestimate the ability of an awful lot of people to treat things coming from government as pretty much holy writ. I've got into a couple of scuffles with people on FB who thought, for example, that sitting in a room with someone for 50 minutes (counselling, as it happens) would be OK provided you maintained the 2m social distancing.

Remember, if you think you are of average intelligence, then you are smarter than (roughly) half of everyone else. Which is all the more reason to have a credible, trustworthy source of guidance and strategy which those of us who "get" the principles behind can use as a general guide, but which still offers a simple protocol for people who prefer to have rules, even if they want to break them. What we actually have is a confusing, mixed picture that lacks credibility or authority (and that's even before we get onto the Cummings Peregrinations).

If I had been the cunt in charge, one of the things I'd have wanted to do fairly early on would have been to sit down with the Welsh, Scottish, and NI first ministers and agreed a joint, collaborative approach. Absolutely no fucking chance of anything like that happening with this cartload of clowns, though.
 
I don't think many/any here are expecting the government to be a moral guide.

Most people, here and elsewhere, have observed the lockdown because they recognise it's the best thing to do, just as most people will self isolate (or even better, get tested) if they are told they have been in significant contact with someone else who has tested positive.

But on purely pragmatic grounds, it's valid to point out than there are some people who don't have the financial security to be able to stop work without support, either during a general lockdown or to quarantine themselves after a contact has tested positive, and if the government doesn't provide such support, the measures won't be as effective as they could be.

I dont' disagree with any of that. It did seem a couple of posters were saying they'd ignore the self isolate request because the govt.

I think the potential for mischief, as far as pretending to be calling as a contact tracer, is mitigated by the fact you also have to receive a letter... Actually I'd hope they'd give you some sort of unique signature / sequence number that can be verified online when they call you.

As for the fabled app. I haven't decided. If it needs to be in the foreground, phone unlocked, with Bluetooth on all the time, then definitely no. Phone theft / battery too week / mishap / fucking stupid.
 
I dont' disagree with any of that. It did seem a couple of posters were saying they'd ignore the self isolate request because the govt.

I think the potential for mischief, as far as pretending to be calling as a contact tracer, is mitigated by the fact you also have to receive a letter... Actually I'd hope they'd give you some sort of unique signature / sequence number that can be verified online when they call you.

As for the fabled app. I haven't decided. If it needs to be in the foreground, phone unlocked, with Bluetooth on all the time, then definitely no. Phone theft / battery too week / mishap / fucking stupid.
I have reservations about the app too - but in a way, the clusterfuck that is the whole approach so far means that the app's shortcomings (shortCummings?) are pretty much a moot point, IMO.
 
Just to be clear, how will the T&T team know (how) to contact you if you don't have the app?
The app isn't active yet. The Blue Peter solution for now is if you test positive, you have to tell them all the people you've been in contact with and they will use that list to contact them and say you might need testing a la clap clinic when you test positive.

The app will be the tech solution of this, if it ever happens.

ETA Yes, prolonged contact rather than just breezing past.
 
What happened to all the anarchists around here. I thought working for your community, autonomous positive action was the thing. Now it's all but but the government have done xyz… I'm being a bit tongue in cheak but really. Fuck the government. We're all pissed of with the whole shitshow. I just see it as the right thing to do if you get the call.

Not aimed at you Poot, just adding. Obviously for people that would be risking losing their jobs, homes etc I get that. But expecting the government to be your moral guide and influence in this is... Non optimum.

if some one gets the call do they go on a list for further financial support measures?
 
I'm not getting the app, should it be ready at some point, but I would self-isolate if contacted, for sure.

Had to do 14 days a few weeks ago. Am barely going out, and certainly not far, anyway. Work would be ok with it. Can't see a good reason not to. Which in no way endorses the shit show, I just don't want to spread or catch this virus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LDC
I would if I was told to, but it's probably unlikely since I'm spending absolutely minimal time outside the house.

No way am I going anywhere near that app, though, and if I was to be contacted by the T&T bods I'd demand to know how they got my number and details of whatever contact I'd supposedly had.
I assume it’s like the clap...they won’t tell you!

for perfectly good reason. They will have your number because the person they interviewed you had it on their phone
 
Hah, the internet is moving way too fast for me, at lot of this has now been covered, but I'll post it anyway:
As I understand, the whole thing is built around a set of assumptions, supported by what's been studied so far.
Infectiousness is highest a couple of days before onset of symptoms and the first few days of symptomaticness.
So if a person develops symptoms, the people they have been in close contact with a few days beforehand will be contacted to quarantine.
The fourteen days is due to the incubation period (I think the very latest research shows that it may not be quite this long, but let's just assume that it is for now). They could develop symptoms (or be infected but not show symptoms) at any time from 3 days to 2 weeks after contact with the infected person. And it's only at that point that a test would work.
Why not everyone gets tested around the 3-5 day mark might indeed be a capacity issue, or again based on the assumption that someone might develop symptoms as late as 14 days later.
If they actually develop symptoms they will get tested in turn, and I imagine their whole household asked to quarantine as well.
The 14 days would also take the majority of asymptomatic cases that have developed from the initial contact out of circulation and prevent them passing on the infection.

I 100% agree that there needs to be adequate and immediate financial support to enable people to quarantine. Full sick pay rather than statutory, or hey - how about a rent / utilities break for the duration or whatever. But this is clearly crucial.

And yes, I would stay at home for two weeks absolutely.
Though interesting scenario with the holiday for example that Spy mentioned, considering that this will be with us for some time. Again, personally the last thing I would want to do is worry about infecting a plane load of people, but it could clearly become an issue for people and again one that would need to be worked out between government/ holiday and insurance companies and customers.
 
The government tracing team are going to contact people who have been in contact with C19+ folk and tell them to self isolate for 14 days even if they have no symptoms.

Matt Hand Cock says that most paople will.

So, you get a call from someone saying that you've been exposed (apparently they won't tell you who to) and you have to lock yourself down for 14 days even though you have no symptoms and everyone else is out enjoying the sunshine.

What will you do?

Anonymous poll.

I'll be self isolating for at least another four weeks.
 
Good question. Neither Mrs Sas or me have smart phones, we have mobiles but basic ones.

Its not reliant on the app (when and if that ever comes about). I think the theory is that if someone tests positive the tell the T&T everyone they've been in close contact with and pass on their phone numbers. It only works if the positive testing person has the 3rd parties details and are prepared to pass them on.
 
Its not reliant on the app (when and if that ever comes about). I think the theory is that if someone tests positive the tell the T&T everyone they've been in close contact with and pass on their phone numbers. It only works if the positive testing person has the 3rd parties details and are prepared to pass them on.
Though if they say they have been to a workplace, school, religious meeting etc then the contact details can probably be traced through the organisation rather than relying on an individual having them.
 
Back
Top Bottom