Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Conspiraloon 9/11- 7/7 Truther outed as Holocaust denier

I made two posts on the 911 truth foums yesterday. Neither offensive or sweary in the slightest. Both concerned the subject of this thread. Both have been deleted and my account banned. I simply asked why holocaust denial threads are now moved to a 'hidden' area, who can view that hidden area and if the mod who made that new rule (Gosling) still linked to the Protocols of the elders of zion on his own website.

It's unravelling boys and girls.

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/index.php
 
I think if we are concerned with holocausts repeating themselves, I'll feel free to point out where I think the danger lies, and where it doesn't.
Holocausts aren't events that carry within them their own causation, so can't "repeat themselves", they're the result of the effects of disparate causes.
 
Is anyone apart from me, butchers and Dillinger reading the 'Nothing' thread in the philosophy forum?
 
I don't know how you guys work for a living and keep up the pace of this thread.

Grassing someone up so he loses his livlehood because he's spouting nonsense? Bloody disgraceful.

And where next? There are teachers pontificating on Islamic terrorism, preachers glorifying Biblical massacres, apologists aplenty for Marxist atrocities.....

Free Speech matters.
 
Exactly. Standing up against extremism - not just for Muslims.

Members of my family died to protect Europe from the hateful idealogy of the Nazis. How sickening to see it resurfacing now, and trying to climb into the clothes of 'free speech' to spread its message of hate.
 
Free speech is not harmed by this nutter being booted.

Fuck free speech anyway, it's a liberal get out clause that mistakes ideal situations for real situations.
 
Free speech isn't absolute, nor should it be. It requires a certain responsibility to be telling the truth; or at the very least, not knowingly lying, as this fellow appears to be.
 
Grassing someone up so he loses his livlehood because he's spouting nonsense? Bloody disgraceful.
"Grassing" is what you do if you are telling tales or trying to get someone into trouble.

But this isn't "grassing", it's disclosing abuse. Telling an academic institution that one of their staff may be a holocaust denier and racist who harasses the victims of crime and is trading on his relationship with the institution is a positive public service. It is for the University to decide what they think of the information, to judge for themselves whether he's just "spouting nonsense," and to investigate for themselves whether they want to address their employee's conduct. I for one am concerned to think that the University may be unaware of their associate's activities, and would welcome their being put right.
 
Btw smokedout, I thought that letter was really well worded. As neutral as possible, no hyperbole etc.
 
<looks>

29 pages, and it was started by max_freakout :hmm:

Care to provide a brief summary before I waste an evening on it? :D
Q: Nothing matters, cos when you're tripping, any fuckin thing could be any other fuckin thing, right?

A: Well that's plainly bullsiht. Stand infront of an express train and convince it that it doesn't exist.

Suplementary A: You fucking hippy.
 
<looks>

29 pages, and it was started by max_freakout :hmm:

Care to provide a brief summary before I waste an evening on it? :D

Yeah, the drugs kidz are being convinced by a nutter that specialises in 'ego death' (and also, seemingly, holocaust denial/revisionist shit) that they can dismiss matters of the past because they can't be proved etc.

Edit: You might want to skip to today's postings with Crispy's summary as background)
 
Q: Nothing matters, cos when you're tripping, any fuckin thing could be any other fuckin thing, right?

A: Well that's plainly bullsiht. Stand infront of an express train and convince it that it doesn't exist.

Suplementary A: You fucking hippy.

Yeah, the drugs kidz are being convinced by a nutter that specialises in 'ego death' (and also, seemingly, holocaust denial/revisionist shit) that they can dismiss matters of the past because they can't be proved etc.

Edit: You might want to skip to today's postings with Crispy's summary as background)

Right, that's saved me an hour or so then :D
 
Back
Top Bottom