butchersapron
Bring back hanging
On review i now give her out for having hit the ball twice whilst still in play before being bowled.
Only twice?On review i now give her out for having hit the ball twice whilst still in play before being bowled.
I've seen and heard plenty of shit flakey speakers put across really important or informative stuff - what was wrong here (well the kick off for a whole series of wrongs) was the naivety of the tactics. Don't introduce something like Starkey's tax affairs unless you know damn well what they are or you open yourself up to the same sort of attack, and if the other person a) has something b) is cleverer than you then you're likely to end up in a confused lying babbling mess.She should get a decent comms job, working for someone with an actual coherent message - then develop her own ideas as a part of that, using their statements as some writing practice. Then she would be ready to actually get out on a platform and speak. Otherwise essentially, we're criticising a six year old for spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
"WHAT I DID ON MY HOLLYDAYS, I DISTROYED TH SYTEM"
Unbelievable. How long before the event did she have to make enquiries about where Starkey is domiciled for tax reasons? Why didn't she bother? There's a perfectly good point to make about Starkey's racism, which she totally fluffed by lurching into guesswork.
Poor press standards to blame shocker. It hardly needs reiterating that this is the same british press that provides incompetents like this with careers.Really disappointed that the Times seem not to have put my whole speech up. How's that for sensationalism obscuring actual debate. Never mind. My mistake for assuming an outlet like that might be actually interested in the issues rather than z-list celebrity bunfights. So...all of this fuss...is about a debate....that very few people involved have actually even seen. Oh god, British Press, really I despair.
You apoplectic old man in a cardiganSomeone get her a press person - someone with an ounce of common sense would do.
yep, only has the bit she earlier tweeted needed to be includedAfter watching that video i can't help thinking that in many ways I've got more in common with some tories than I do with some anarcholefties. Or does Penny now say that the video was edited to make her look bad?
You apoplectic old man in a cardigan
She can't afford my exorbitant fees - not when you count the flights...Someone get her a press person - someone with an ounce of common sense would do.
and she got time to respond
'There is a violence inherent in this kind of debate' according to her, but as we all know there is a mendacity involved in this kind of debate as well as she so ably demonstrates. I stopped counting the lies at no 6...not someone you'd want providing a character witness, that's for sure.On review i now give her out for having hit the ball twice whilst still in play before being bowled.
This is how I imagine proletarian democracy will pitch its buke at that random house westminster school wanker.I saw it more as a project that would be crowdsourced through Kickstarter, with a launch party hosted by Amanda Palmer and liveblogged via Tumblr.
What this latest nonsense has underlined for me is how immune from criticism her fan club wish her to be. Why can't they understand that you can loathe Starkey (leaving his racism aside, his behaviour after being goaded - apropos of nothing about his tax affairs - was unacceptable, seeking as it did to belittle & intimidate her)"
I think his behaviour was understandable really, as he says to be fair to him he did work his way up from nowt, and still pays his full taxes, while she came from privilge and was smugly throwing out wild accusations of him not paying his way - without defending him as a person, I think his response was legitimate.
But it's a cracking example of her looking at an event, as she tends to do, and seeing only the dramatised version of things, how it would (and no doubt will) appear in the story of her life once she writes it aged 35 or whatever.