Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Alex Callinicos/SWP vs Laurie Penny/New Statesman Facebook handbags

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's probably the best talk I've ever heard her give to be fair. Admittedly the competition isn't very stiff because I've not heard her speak much at all and what I have heard has been crap but it's really not bad.

Different prattle for different parties. Flitting between identities at will. China Mieville was there I see.
 
Try this.



In this one she says "she comes from a tradition of socialist and anarchist thinking which is at odds with the party structure, which is autonomism. [...] I'm an internet journalist which sits very very badly indeed with any party format right now."

Lies.



More 'Prada-Meinhof'- style fakery aimed at enhancing the 'rebel sell' brand, I see.
 
Advice for the rest of us as recommended by LP:

https://twitter.com/PennyRed/status/357149485119442946

http://sunnydrake.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/racism-is-to-white-people-as-wind-is-to-the-sky


LP doesn't do this, nor should you:

"When I have failed to take the time to consider how I could make sure people of colour and Indigenous people are central in the decision making of groups I’m a part of."

"When I have spent more time reading white people’s opinions on racism than people of colour’s and Indigenous people’s opinions and lived experiences."

"When I have gotten acquaintances who are people of colour confused with each other. It doesn’t matter that I also frequently can’t recognise white people who I don’t know very well – this is where context matters. In the context of a racist world that makes invisible and dehumanises people of colour, my actions are racist."

The whole blog post is over 2,250 words about from this middle-class performance artist.
cropped-blog-photo.jpg

If I assume that the essayist is a self-regarding emotional dwarf who has less right to be alive than a Tory MP, does that make me prejudiced?
 
Also it assumes that the only racism that matters is the one based on skin colour. What about Catholics v Protestants in Northern Ireland? Or people not being served in pubs because they "look like pikeys"? Where are these fools intersectional analyses of that?

That doesn't matter. The victims are white, and therefore can't be victims.

Makes you want to sharpen your axe, doesn't it? :(
 
Articles a year old, but I've been meaning to bring this up because it makes me laugh.

A new generation of feminists is discovering James's work. Academic Nina Power and writer and blogger Laurie Penny, for example, both cite her as an influence.


"I saw the state close up. It was an enormous education. Almost all of them were awful. It is the ambition, it makes people awful." By the time she left, she had "had enough of the middle class, of the intelligentsia. I thought, I am going to be with working-class people from now on."


"Politics, if it is fuelled by a great will to change the world, rather than by personal ambition, offers a chance to know the world, and to be more self-conscious of the actual life you are living rather than being taken over by what you are told you should feel: a chance to live, in other words, an authentic life. Such politics are a unique enrichment, not a sacrifice."


http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/jun/08/life-in-writing-selma-james

This is the same 'ambition' Penny wears as a badge of honour.
 
and what about say, Muslims from the Balkans?

Well quite.
Intersectional analysis can be a good tool, when properly used, but when deployed piecemeal to make poseur-ish clunky political points about the evils of whiteness that are basically appeals to the oppressed to "love me, I'm on your side!", then it's fucking worthless liberal guilt-tripping and class snobbery (because the liberal is always looking to condescend to the ignorant constituency that is the working class).
 
Perhaps it's gendered ambition that's bad; stripped of its ugly ,violent, grabbing maleness it can blossom into a beautiful, caring and sharing good?

Cheers - Louis MacNeice

James talks about ambition elsewhere, including "ambitious feminism", so no, I don't think it's gendered at all. She never seeks to reclaim a 'positive' ambition, she sees it as negative in all cases.
 
Articles a year old, but I've been meaning to bring this up because it makes me laugh.







http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/jun/08/life-in-writing-selma-james

This is the same 'ambition' Penny wears as a badge of honour.

Wonderful interview that:

She arrived back in London in 1969, just as the women's liberation movement invented itself. The British feminist, Bea Campbell – no friend of James – remembers it as "a torrid, marvellous time, with groups being formed suddenly, and everywhere". Campbell was 22, and recalls a movement as "full of women in their 20s". Enter James: "She was 40, fully-formed, fortified," says Campbell. "She knew how to do battle. A small Trotskyist sect formed her, and she has remained schismatic ever since. Schismatic, sectarian, polarising: Selma got on women's nerves."

That's not how James remembers it. The schism was not about age, she insists, but class: "I brought a reality to the movement they didn't want to acknowledge: that there is a struggle going on, and we have to decide whose side we're on." And all that talk of liberation through work! James had spent years working a double day in a factory and as a housewife: she knew what working-class women felt about factory work: "They walk in, they run out." Too many women in the movement simply "didn't know anything about the world".

There's a fantastic one she did last year too - def recommend the 50 minutes or so listen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom