Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Alex Callinicos/SWP vs Laurie Penny/New Statesman Facebook handbags

Status
Not open for further replies.
Depends what DrRingDing means by relationship anarchy, surely?
Of course, but normal usage AFAIK is for the two to mean separate things. Polyamorists (or the few I've talked to anyway) definitely separate between partners and non-partners.
Good lord, what an arrogant concept, "relationship anarchy" - the flipside of it being everyone else is a state-authoritarian-relationship mug/sheeple/enemy.
Quite!
 
I don't think the likelihood of gendered power imbalances necessarily increases with polyamorous relationships, or that women are more likely to find themselves in an abusive relationship because of it; which is what I took from the tenor of the piece.

Yup, same here. While it can mean a power imbalance when polygamy is practiced within an institutional setting (Mormonism for example) where the writ only runs one way (i.e. single male, many wives), it's not necessarily abusive.
She's quite narrowminded, is Laura.
 
Yup, same here. While it can mean a power imbalance when polygamy is practiced within an institutional setting (Mormonism for example) where the writ only runs one way (i.e. single male, many wives), it's not necessarily abusive.
She's quite narrowminded, is Laura.
I thought that her criticism of the BBC's piece was because that's exactly how they portrayed it?
 

For the benefit of others

The first two hits gives a manifesto - hard to understand:


Build for the lovely unexpected
Being free to be spontaneous — to express oneself without fear of punishments or a sense of burdened “shoulds” — is what gives life to relationships based on relationship anarchy. Organize based on a wish to meet and explore each other — not on duties and demands and disappointment when they are not met.

The third gives pictures.

The fourth gives wikipedia




tumblr_lmc2z0Wgjd1qae2mdo1_500.png


Anarchists-A in a heart is a symbol of relationship anarchy
Relationship anarchy, which do not divide relationships of partners and non-partners, but have a more flexible approach to relationships where everything is allowed so long as everyone can accept the agreement.

It still sounds confusing but I sort of get it.
 
Well, their pet "expert", but her criticism wasn't isn't exactly comprehensive, either.
Maybe I expect too much from the twitter format.
Ah, I couldn't be arsed with looking at the whole exchange. I just saw LP saying the piece was wrongheaded or summat.
 
Andy you're close, but here is a sample of her poetry. Its called Saudade btw.

"There are more of us than you think, kicking off our high-
heeled shoes to run and being told not so fast

The best minds of my generation consumed by craving, furious
half naked starving--

Who ripped tights and dripping make up smoked alone in bed-
sits bare mattresses waiting for transfiguration.

Who ran half dressed out of department stores yelling that we
didn't want to be good and beautiful..."
It's like a bad parody of the Girder parody.
While today we young people may be blown like zephyrs on the howling winter winds of impenitent patriarchy, our anvil eyed gaze is fixed e’er forward, when we shall ride the shimmering breezes of spring’s dancing tomorrows.
 
this may be slightly related but the sort of way i'm thinking of these activists behave, i'm reminded of the thing i read ages ago on the UCSJ site about an american guy working for an NGO who wanted to do some research about "the last jews of eastern europe" and contacted various people in those countries, and nobody took part because nobody wants to be a "last jew".

anyway.

that relationship anarchy thing is so stupid. You're not making a political statement by what type of relationship you have. Unless its some sort of super religious "man at the head of the house" type bollocks. And it doesnt mean that people who have a heterosexual monogamous relationship are conservative or support patriarchy, isn't the whole idea of patriarchy that it is a structural phenomenon and by having a certain type of relationship it doesn't mean you are free of it (I disagree with the radfems on a lot of things but one thing they do get right is how certain lesbian relationships can end up replicating patriarchal dynamics and structures).
 
[/QUOTE]this may be slightly related but the sort of way i'm thinking of these activists behave, i'm reminded of the thing i read ages ago on the UCSJ site about an american guy working for an NGO who wanted to do some research about "the last jews of eastern europe" and contacted various people in those countries, and nobody took part because nobody wants to be a "last jew".
[/QUOTE]

There is something quite moving about that..
 
There was a former poster on here who was into all the above, became a RW libertarian...

Oh and maybe in the light of this thread, I shouldn't note that much of his concubine were very very young...
 
There was a former poster on here who was into all the above, became a RW libertarian...

Oh and maybe in the light of this thread, I shouldn't note that much of his concubine were very very young...

Are you insinuating folk that do poly stuff are really just right wing paedo-nonces?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom