discokermit
Well-Known Member
to remind people who the real enemy is?Why have you posted a picture of Rees in a thread about Callinicos and Penny?
to remind people who the real enemy is?Why have you posted a picture of Rees in a thread about Callinicos and Penny?
I get some (not all, not by any stretch) new ones for free but not random old stuff. eg I'm just re-reading the Bornstein/Richardson 2 vol history of Trotskyism in Britain.Don't you get them for free?
those two are well worth a read, of their time but interesting commentariestony cliff - the crisis, social contract or socialism
ian h. birchall - workers against the monolith, the communist parties since 1943
martin walker - the national front
Marxism Festival 2011 Dublin Nov 18th to 20th. Laurie was due to flog her buke at this but it appears she's in the america. Why would they invite a Lib Dem to this sort of do? Tickets are 30 quid.
Was more thinking along the lines of punching her face in
there's two for a start, but a couple of more serious posts made me think, 'so what? why criticise her for that?' gimme a minute.What, some minor journalist who's little more than a schoolgirl? Get a grip.
here, i don't see why people are so incredulous at this. she's middle class. poverty was a novelty to her. so what?This bit is brilliant.
""We were living like a scene from Withnail & I, except there was no space to move," she said. "It was very miserable. People get very depressed – that level of poverty has a bad effect on your mental health, it makes people feel that nothing will ever get better. I know that is the situation for a lot of people, but for young graduates, middle-class people, it is a real shock. It is not sufficiently recognised at all – how poor the rates are in the benefit system."
First one polemically expressing extreme dislike not based on her genderthere's two for a start, but a couple of more serious posts made me think, 'so what? why criticise her for that?' gimme a minute.
Now you've moved to something else and reveal that you're reading the thread backwards into the bargain.That generally works really well on the internet doesn't it? That really lends itslef to informed debate.here, i don't see why people are so incredulous at this. she's middle class. poverty was a novelty to her. so what?
i read differentlyFirst one polemically expressing extreme dislike not based on her gender
Second one on her social impact.
You certainly do. Excavate the hidden meanings for us OU.i read differently
Behind a post by LLETSA telling someone to calm down?as i said a whiff of irrational hatred behind those posts IMO
You said a bit more than that OU. They were used as examples of reverse snobbery and misogyny.You've now got the responsibility to back them claims up.as i said a whiff of irrational hatred behind those posts IMO
I have - it explains nothing. I ask again, is pointing out how privilege works "reverse snobbery"?see post 1003
I have - it explains nothing. I ask again, is pointing out how privilege works "reverse snobbery"?
no such thing. unless you call disliking someone for being privileged at your expense 'reverse snobbery'.reverse snobbery
Then you, OU you lazy lazy cunt have not read the thread,don't know what people are talking about and the many irrelevant crimes is guilty of but though you'd get on your white steed anyway. You didn't express a suspicion did you? You did a bit more than that.You identified two posts as misogynistic as examples of the tone of the thread - now you 'can't be arsed'. Poor show.forget about it, can't be arsed. was just expressing a suspicion of that clubbishness that's typical amongst many political types. it smells of prejudice to me.
i see a young writer whose heart is in the right place getting a kicking for the odd bit of naivety and gaucheness. i think she deserves a break. her and owen jones seem to be the only leftwing commentators the mainstream press want to speak to at the mo, so i think a bit of solidarity wouldn't go amiss.
Middle class people from sheltered lives get broadsheet columns to reveal that they're sheltered, in order to be read by people from similarly comfortable backgrounds. Hardly surprising, but still shit; still a sign that this paper is all about middle class titillation. And this from the supposedly leftie Guardian and supposedly leftie Penny Red. If the alternative radical journalists are so proud of being sheltered and out of touch, what does that say about media radicalism in the UK today, and its chances of being at all in touch with the needs of those really suffering from the current government's policies?here, i don't see why people are so incredulous at this. she's middle class. poverty was a novelty to her. so what?