surely it was clearly a reference to how beastly socialists and anarchists are towards Laura?
surely it was clearly a reference to how beastly socialists and anarchists are towards Laura?
Even if this thread goes on for another 1000 pages you will not see anything weirder than Laura posing in front of that shitty painting.
View attachment 26133
Even if this thread goes on for another 1000 pages you will not see anything weirder than Laura posing in front of that shitty painting.
View attachment 26133
If she talks shite, is it wrong to tell her that she talks shite?
There's a bit of the drama queen about her claims of 'internet violence'...
She doesn't have a clue how revealing comments like this are
And y'know people said Arthur Scargill had a big ego, fucking hell you just wait 'til this generation of post-class, neo-liberal Oxbridge Twats currently masquerading as the Voice of the Radical Left in Britain reaches maturity. They'll make Uncle Arthur look bashful by comparison.
isn't laurie penny technically working class?
by virtue of her relationship to the means of production. She has to sell her labour power for a wage. Her (creative) labour goes towards the production of a commodity which is sold for profit.
She is also young and vaguely pretty.
by virtue of her relationship to the means of production. She has to sell her labour power for a wage. Her (creative) labour goes towards the production of a commodity which is sold for profit.
She is also young and vaguely pretty.
Her (creative) labour.
by virtue of her relationship to the means of production. She has to sell her labour power for a wage. Her (creative) labour goes towards the production of a commodity which is sold for profit.
She is also young and vaguely pretty.
Possibly. But she's certainly part of that privileged part of the proletariat often called the middle class; upper, in her case. And we don't know how much capital she owns, since she's not open about her finances. Harry Cole off Guido's website claims she's "loaded", and she's already admitted that she inherited enough money to live in London for a year. Does she have a trust fund? In that case she basically lives largely off the rents from her capital.by virtue of her relationship to the means of production. She has to sell her labour power for a wage. Her (creative) labour goes towards the production of a commodity which is sold for profit.
Technically you could say the same thing about Wayne Rooney y'know.
£120k a week....
It's a bloody stupid way to put it and it makes you look like a bully; I think you can see this tbh.I can see people's point that they think I want to smack LP up but it's more of an assault on her politics than her physical self, it's quite easy to understand the allegory (?) behind it, surely?
surely it was clearly a reference to how beastly socialists and anarchists are towards Laura?
Possibly. But she's certainly part of that privileged part of the proletariat often called the middle class; upper, in her case. And we don't know how much capital she owns, since she's not open about her finances. Harry Cole off Guido's website claims she's "loaded", and she's already admitted that she inherited enough money to live in London for a year. Does she have a trust fund? In that case she basically lives largely off the rents from her capital.
this is what i thought. But until we find out for sure her true class background, the main body of criticism seems to be based around that fact that she is:
1. privileged
2. a journalist who lies.
Is that really worth 207 pages?
At least 40 of those pages are simply posts complaining that the thread is too long.this is what i thought. But until we find out for sure her true class background, the main body of criticism seems to be based around that fact that she is:
1. privileged
2. a journalist who lies.
Is that really worth 207 pages?
At least another 40 is lletsa going on about tattoos.At least 40 of those pages are simply posts complaining that the thread is too long.