Al Qaeda a myth says Russian

[sparticus]

Is this the best 'conspiraloon' site yet

http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/index.htm

Seeing all the lies and bullshit gathered together in one place. Great stuff

 

[editor]

Is this the best 'conspiraloon' site yet

Hey! You're back!!!

Are you planning any more UK premieres of your fabulous 'the truth exposed' conspiracy films?

Maybe you might manage to break your all-time attendance record and get as many as five people in! Woohoo!

 

[bigfish]

The astonishing thing is that you think the solution to disgruntled banned posters signing you up for spam is to hide your easily-available name, rather than ceasing your offensive and aggresive insulting behaviour!

Tough on the 'crime'/soft on the cause of the crime.

 

[Raisin D'etre]

Ed. I agree with DrJazzz and I have been a direct recipient of your rage. You have tried to tar me with the "conspiraloon" label (and I know its worked because of the crew that weigh in with taunts whenever we have crossed swords and certain comments that are made when Im posting in other threads) when the purpose of this thread was to explore AQ and how it had been used to further a govt agenda to clamp down on dissent in the UK. Whether this is a conspiracy theory or not is something that we must test. If the arguments do not stand up here, then we conspiraloons can lay them to rest and move on to other things. I believe you began this bb to give those who were disgruntled with the way in which protests were covered by the media a forum, I would hope that those founding principles are still sound and that you can tolerate dissenting views here too. One of the reasons that people like this place is because of that freedon but it is not encouraging to watch threads descend into taunts and name-calling and other regressive behaviour just because a poster is saying something you don't particularly like. I have many questions about 911 which involve everything from what happened on the day to those who have benefitted and the more sunlight that this subject is given, the better.

<grimly places collander on head>

 

[editor]

Tough on the 'crime'/soft on the cause of the crime.

So do you think I should change my entire moderating style - which has helped create these enormously successful forums - just because some cowardly, abusive shitfuck has signed me up for spam?

Please elaborate...

 

[Backatcha Bandit]

Is this the best 'conspiraloon' site yet

http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/index.htm

Seeing all the lies and bullshit gathered together in one place. Great stuff

That's a damn good link there. Cheers.

I found that clip of Michael Meacher getting the 'conspiraloon' treatment on Channel 4 News - I've been hoping would turn up somewhere oneday.

Mr Meacher, a lot of people are going to have you down, frankly, as being in the 'green ink conspiracy brigade' for saying this stuff...

http://www.indybay.org/uploads/channel4_meacher.rm

 

[Raisin D'etre]

Al Qaeda:- A conspiracy of dunces more on the ricin scare.

 

[editor]

Al Qaeda:- A conspiracy of dunces more on the ricin scare.

I raise you that article with this one: Clarke calls for ID cards after imagining huge poison terror ring

 

[Raisin D'etre]

Thank you. I now raise you with this - as an example of the stupidity into which the political parties have sunk.

 

[Backatcha Bandit]

I'll throw in a candidate for 'most oxymoronic headline':

One man has been found guilty of a poison conspiracy

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4441763.stm

A conspiracy of one?

Ah... I understand. Thoughtcrime.

 

[pbman]

I'll throw in a candidate for 'most oxymoronic headline':


A conspiracy of one?

Ah... I understand. Thoughtcrime.

They don't have to catch any others to convict the one.

The authorities in Britain have revealed that al-Qaeda was planning co-ordinated chemical and biological attacks right across Europe - some of which were masterminded in a flat above a chemist shop in north London.

******************

Theirs your conspiracy.

 

[Raisin D'etre]

I'll throw in a candidate for 'most oxymoronic headline':


A conspiracy of one?

Ah... I understand. Thoughtcrime.

Hehe...

 

[nino_savatte]

They don't have to catch any others to convict the one.

The authorities in Britain have revealed that al-Qaeda was planning co-ordinated chemical and biological attacks right across Europe - some of which were masterminded in a flat above a chemist shop in north London.

******************

Theirs your conspiracy.

The spelling is so good here that I suspect that much of this text has been plagiarised and represented as your own.

The original source
http://newswww.bbc.net.uk/1/hi/uk/4441763.stm

You're a plagiarist peebs. You do realise you could get into trouble for that don't you? It's a serious breach of copyright.

 

[editor]

The spelling is so good here that I suspect that much of this text has been plagiarised and represented as your own.

The original source
http://newswww.bbc.net.uk/1/hi/uk/4441763.stm

You're a plagiarist peebs. You do realise you could get into trouble for that don't you? It's a serious breach of copyright.

Eh? It's extremely unlikely that he would be prosecuted for "a serious breach of copyright" for copying one paragraph.

 

[Pickman's model]

what about the c&p bits in the faq?

couldn't he be held to account for breaching that? (although admittedly not in a court of law...)

 

[Lock&Light]

Eh? It's extremely unlikely that he would be prosecuted for "a serious breach of copyright" for copying one paragraph.

It's just nino going over the top again.

 

[editor]

what about the c&p bits in the faq?

FFS: no matter how you try and spin it, one paragraph does not make a "cut and paste odyssey".

 

[nino_savatte]

Eh? It's extremely unlikely that he would be prosecuted for "a serious breach of copyright" for copying one paragraph.

Probably but it's important for people like peebs (and JC2) to understand that representing someone else's words as their own is bad form. Not that they care much anyway. I think it's shoddy, lazy and shows that they can't think for themselves.

Edited to add: even a plagiarised paragraph is enough for your work to be disqualified should you get caught out. Indeed, when I was teaching full time, I lost count of the numners of students who plagiarised. Their defence was always "But everything has been written on this". It isn't much of an excuse and I always told them to do it again.

 

[Pickman's model]

I think it's shoddy, lazy and shows that they can't think for themselves.

but we knew that about peebs already.

 

[nino_savatte]

It's just nino going over the top again.

Ah Schlock&Shite, got anything else to add? Or is that all for now? Wtf is your problem anyway?

 

[nino_savatte]

but we knew that about peebs already.

Aye, true that.

 

[editor]

Edited to add: even a plagiarised paragraph is enough for your work to be disqualified should you get caught out

I'm sure it is. But there's no 'qualifications' on offer here (and if there was, pbman would have failed miserably years ago).

 

[Lock&Light]

Ah Schlock&Shite, got anything else to add? Or is that all for now? Wtf is your problem anyway?

Don't mis-use my username, nino. I don't like it when people do that, and will feel obliged to report it if you do it again.

I have no problem, I just like to add my comments once in a while. The same as you, in fact.

 

[nino_savatte]

I'm sure it is. But there's no 'qualifications' on offer here (and if there was, pbman would have failed miserably years ago).

No shit.

 

[nino_savatte]

Don't mis-use my username, nino. I don't like it when people do that, and will feel obliged to report it if you do it again.

I have no problem, I just like to add my comments once in a while. The same as you, in fact.

Well how about you lay off. You seem to have a real problem with me don't you Schlock? If you are going to continue in the same vein you can expect more of the same from me.

If you think it will help, why not report me, you pathetic, small minded shite.

Edited to add: if you can't take it, Lock, then don't dish it out.

 

[editor]

Well how about you lay off. You seem to have a real problem with me don't you Schlock?
Edited to add: if you can't take it, Lock, then don't dish it out.

People can dish out what they like (within reason) but please don't fart about with user names as it's not permitted.

 

[nino_savatte]

People can dish out what they like (within reason) but please don't fart about with user names as it's not permitted.

Aye but Lock is being somewhat pedantic and is being rather too sensitive for the sake of it. He likes to dish it out but he can't take it himself. That's a fact.

 

[Lock&Light]

Aye but Lock is being somewhat pedantic and is being rather too sensitive for the sake of it. He likes to dish it out but he can't take it himself. That's a fact.

I have criticised you when I felt that it was necessary, but I have never been rude, or insulting.

If you don't like criticism you shouldn't post on a public bulletin board, nino.

 

[nino_savatte]

I have criticised you when I felt that it was necessary, but I have never been rude, or insulting.

If you don't like criticism you shouldn't post on a public bulletin board, nino.

You're projecting your inadequacies onto me Lock...and do stop lying, you have been both rude and insulting to me. So get off your high horse because you have no right to occupy the moral high ground.

I put it to you, that you cannot take criticism. Moreover you have nothing to say for yourself. When was the last time you actually engaged me in debate? The answer: never. You are self-deluded.

 

[Lock&Light]

Moreover you have nothing to say for yourself. When was the last time you actually engaged me in debate? The answer: never. You are self-deluded.

You are incredibly boring to debate with. I have watched you sniping at the right-wingers from America, and have never found it a pretty sight. I would rather vote for Michael Howard than have to endure a 'debate' with you.