Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Al-Qaeda Cell that never officially existed

PrinceToad said:
Well, someone must have put the fake terror cell evidence in the hotel, which we've established did actually exist. (See previous page.)
What their motive was, I don't really know. I don't know why admitting that I don't know is a wriggle, but then any stick is I suppose good enough for you to beat a horse with.
Err, how does the police saying that there was a
"security alert" at the hotel, and that some "articles had been taken away" that they thought appeared "relevant in the context of the time", but that "later this proved absolutely not to be the case."
match jazzz's version?

And are you going to answer my questions above, just to clear up if you're a conspiracy type or not, please?
 
editor said:
match jazzz's version?
It is consistent with it. It's true, I have taken Jazzz's word for it that the other witnesses in the hotel at least broadly confirmed the content of what was found. Since, despite your denials that it would be possible, all the other actual facts he cited, as opposed to interpretation, panned out, I thought that was not too unreasonable.

editor said:
And are you going to answer my questions above, just to clear up if you're a conspiracy type or not, please?
  • I believe, O editor, that 9/11 was carried out by Islamic fanatics
  • I believe, O editor, that "7/7" was carried out by Islamic fanatics
  • I believe, grand inquisitor, in the holy catholic and apostolic church ...
  • I have not, Senator, nor have I ever been, a member of the Communist party.
If that is relevant. As I said: if you can't attack the post, at least attack the poster. For more detail on my views, for the Spanish Inquisition, please look on the members' list at my posts. Again, why all this abuse at me personally? Why do I have to justify who and what I am, instead of what I posted?

To reverse your conspiracy threats: Do you have an agenda? Why do you come on to any thread that even whiffs of exposing malpractice in right-wing figures, and dump vast amounts of personal abuse at people posting on it?

PS: who did you think I was? Did they post any interesting posts?
 
so, ed, if I may challenge you to post your first on-topic post in this thread: Do you:
  1. still think Mr. Burki is "an imaginary hotelier"?
  2. believe Mr. Malik is an "imaginary journalist"?
  3. believe now that some fake terror evidence may have been found in this hotel?
  4. do you have an opinion of your own on what may have happened at the hotel, instead of a desire to derail the thread by saying that "Jazzz is a conspiraloon"
 
PrinceToad said:
so, ed, if I may challenge you to post your first on-topic post in this thread: Do you:
  1. still think Mr. Burki is "an imaginary hotelier"?
  2. believe Mr. Malik is an "imaginary journalist"?
  3. believe now that some fake terror evidence may have been found in this hotel?
Sorry, but I'm not prepared to risk my CIA-funded holiday or the mods FBI Christmas bonus over this.

You are, however, cordially invited to carefully read the posts by others in this thread.
 
PrinceToad said:
I take that for a "no, I wish to continue to troll."
Frankly I don't give a shit what you think.

We're all burned out on conspiraloons here, you see.
That's why I'm the only person bothering to talk to you.

But now.. .<yawn> ....you're getting boring.
 
PrinceToad said:
...However, as said, I did get confirmation eventually that, despite your denials that it would be possible: everyone did in fact exist, and that the material that was seized did on the surface appear as stated: shallow fake evidence of Islamic terrorism. I think that is most of the evidence that you were attempting to deny...
You haven't got any confirmation of what the seized material was like at all.
 
PrinceToad said:
Well, someone must have put the fake terror cell evidence in the hotel, which we've established did actually exist.
You haven't established that "fake terror cell evidence" existed at all. You don't have a clue what it is and we have no evidence whatsoever what it was.
 
Back
Top Bottom