Hardly. And compared to the endless inane shit you post up day after day, I'd say I'm barely registering an interest.Ninjaboy said:i must say tho editor you are making a big thing of it
Then leave the thread and quit your whining.Ninjaboy said:must say we really are fucking bored arguing about this shite
Assuming, of course, that all the votes are from individuals.nick1181 said:Internet polls don't provide a random sample so are statistically dubious. That said, 10,000 fruitloops is a lot of fruitloops.
Thanks to the miracle of the internet, millions of nutters worldwide can connect with each other and consolidate their sad, weird little subculture. 10,000 is a drop in the bucket (and in any case, it's 9,915 ).nick1181 said:Internet polls don't provide a random sample so are statistically dubious. That said, 10,000 fruitloops is a lot of fruitloops.
From whom?Ninjaboy said:must say this cynicism isnt evident about anti iraq marches etc
editor said:Hardly. And compared to the endless inane shit you post up day after day, I'd say I'm barely registering an interest.
But I do enjoy rubbishing the idiotic methodology of conspiraloons, especially if I get to post up a picture of Charles Hawtrey.
editor said:Then leave the thread and quit your whining.
There's lots more threads here you know.
In Bloom said:From whom?
Fantastic advice editor, why don't you take it?editor said:Then leave the thread and quit your whining.
There's lots more threads here you know.
Once again you limeys have gotten off at the wrong stop. As every American knows, the only thing that trumps a Sheen is a Baldwin.editor said:But I do enjoy rubbishing the idiotic methodology of conspiraloons, especially if I get to post up a picture of Charles Hawtrey.
Prison Planet? Alex Jones?Jazzz said:CNN claims a massive response to the Sheen story. The follow up programme featuring Alex Jones is already being hosted on prison planet.
So, seeing as you place so much faith in self selecting online polls of the American public, do you believe in heaven and hell, God, miracles and the after life, then?Jazzz said:Fantastic advice editor, why don't you take it?
nick1181 said:That's Chomksy's take on it as well.
Kid_Eternity said:Christ I can't believe we've had four pages of this conspiraloon bullshit...
Good point well made.nick1181 said:For what it's worth the word Conspiraloon itself rings a very sour note to my mind. It's a would-be gagging device. Ridiculing someone so no one will hear what they say. To be honest the "conspiraloons" haven't actually said very much on this thread - it's mostly been taken up with people attacking them.
Yeah! No point taking notice of any peer reviewed scientific studies, well respected experts, structural engineers, architects, academic researchers or well respected political commentators when you can buy into the ill-informed hunches of a totally unqualified Hollywood actor instead!Azrael23 said:Ohhhhhh Chomsky.....bring me your feet oh great Noam... I never thought I`d see the day when I agreed with charlie sheen over chomsky but post 9/11 Noam has SOLD OUT.....All this 4th most quoted man stuff has gone to his head.
That'll be because we've had literally thousands of similar evidence-free posts where the same handful of obsessed individuals make wild, fact-free claims, ignore any counter evidence and when their claims are exposed to be utter tosh they move swiftly on to the next one. And the cycle goes on and on ad infinitum.nick1181 said:Personally I'm not that interested in the theories per se - I am interested in the way that ideas like this propogate... and I must say that THE thing that draws attention most about this subject is the extent to which people are ridiculed for even mentioning it.
Which of his 'hunches' do you find most 'outlandish'?editor said:ill-informed hunches of a totally unqualified Hollywood actor...
You could start with the one that it wasn't Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon.Backatcha Bandit said:Which of his 'hunches' do you find most 'outlandish'?
Azrael23 said:Yeah and the ringleader runs the forum.....
What actual, peer-reviewed credible evidence is that, then?Azrael23 said:All the evidence points to an inside job that can never be dismissed.