Boston Air Traffic Controller Says 9/11 An Inside Job

[editor]

As i said i could not believe they would collapse like they did .

Well, thanks for that.

Seeing as you've claimed to have read read the findings of highly qualified structural engineers about the WTC collapse, have you insights to share as to
why you still find their destruction "unbelievable," please?

And what do you think really happened if you refuse to believe that they fell as a result of two large aircraft hitting them at high speed?

 

[editor]

err,, me, just now.

And who were you referring to, wise guy?

 

[rocketman]

much as I know governments are untrustworthy piles of shit there is no way a government would blow up its own hub of commerce just so it could go kill saddam and invade iraq.

It defies logic, doesn't it? And yet, the fact that space for doubt remains - that's the interesting thing, in my eyes - the evolution of myth, and the way that by denying selected facts from the public domain, myth emerges beside mass media news reality (also a myth), and the way that both the 'official myth/account of events and the unofficial myths (CT) work together to actually occlude the truth even further.

 

[pocketscience]

Not quite sure what you're getting at here.

It would rather depend on what the hijackers are attempting to achieve.

The point being that aircraft of this magnitude are flying buildings.
Four planes were simultaneuosly hijaced on 911 and roughly 3500 died.
Now if four A380s were simultaneously hijacked carring 800 passengers and dumped in the ocean it'd amount to almost the same result. That was my point.

 

[Pingu]

I have no doubt that the US government, and the British gov are not above the odd bit of skulduggery.. in fact I know it. But something on that scale would take massive amounts of planning and the sheer number of people involved would make it way too risky to attempt. Just one CIA\ONI\SIS\BSC operative with a hint of conscience or who had a family member that worked in the targets and poof... it all goes pear shaped.

however i am convinced that it was mightily convenient as an excuse to invade Iraq. I can see the conference now..

Guys..bad news some rag heads flew some planes into the WTC.. however in good news land we now have an excuse to go bomb them back to the stone age...

 

[pocketscience]

And who were you referring to, wise guy?

The historians after hard evidence - if you must know.

 

[rocketman]

Now looking around I just found this:

A lengthy Senate investigation has debunked charges by a Republican congressman that military analysts identified Mohamed Atta and other Sept. 11 hijackers before the attacks, according to a committee aide familiar with the report.

No idea of the implication for the debate, but why is it every investigation so far finds more questions than it does answers?

 

[Jazzz]

Take a look at the title of this thread, dimwit.

God you are tiresome, and abusive too.

 

[editor]

Seeing as this thread looks to be repeating the same old shit all over again for the thousandth time with no new information being posted (or Jazzz answering any relevant questions, as usual), it will be closed in line with our policy on endlessly repeating threads.

Posters are advised to use the search facility to find full and lengthy discussions on all the points raised here.

 

[Bob_the_lost]

Now looking around I just found this:

A lengthy Senate investigation has debunked charges by a Republican congressman that military analysts identified Mohamed Atta and other Sept. 11 hijackers before the attacks, according to a committee aide familiar with the report.

No idea of the implication for the debate, but why is it every investigation so far finds more questions than it does answers?

Welcome to the real world

 

[pembrokestephen]

And who were you referring to, wise guy?

Goodness, editor, but that ban button's looking jolly nice and shiny!! You haven't been polishing it, have you?