Am I the only person who assumed that Ed's linking to Freeper was at at laest half jokingly done, and somewhat in response to the OP and most other stuff about 9/11, in that it was a dodgy site, a dodgy story and akin to Kazz, B or whomever else linking to Prisonplanet and the rest? Have people lost ALL sense of humour about this?
While I'm at it... It never ceases to amaze me how vehement the Hopkin-esque trials anyone questioning the lies surrounding 9/11 or similar events are subjected to are on this board.
In 'meatspace', and elsewhere on the internet, people seem to split into two broad camps:
Those that hold the opinion that there is something deeply suspicious about the whole affair that suggests at least complicity by members of the 'Ruling Elite', if not outright culpability, and;
Those who say things like 'What do you mean, three buildings collapsed?'... etc. indicating no awareness of actual events.
I'm only going to address this part of your post of invective...
What a load of bollocks, quite frankly. There are many of us who don't fall into either camp, who accept that there is the possibility of US involvement, but that until someone provides actual evidence of this, or of a deliberate decision to ignore intel
for the wider aim of allowing wars to be started.
Given what is known about the decision to invade Iraq, this would have happened irrespective of 9/11 - GWB and co were going to do it anyway; there is documentary evidence that it was seen within the administration as something that was 'inevitable', and given that 9/11 was only ever used as an adjunct to the spurious claim that Saddam helped finance it, as opposed to the acres of bullshit on WMD, that there is even a link between the two. Why invade Afghanistan? It's not resource rich, it's prooving to be as long-term a commitment for the US & NATO as Iraq, and doesn't have the oil factor going for it (yes I know there's a pipeline, which could have beenb routed through far more stable and friendly Caucasian states, it didn't have to go via Afghanistan).
Did part of the global elite get involved - yes. The Saudi's, who had been giving funding and suport to Al-Q for nearly a decade by this point. Don't see a huge amount written about their involvement in it all tho, do we?
The last point is the astonishing reasoning behind saying 'The USG MUST be invovled'...what, because despite the USG pissing the whole world off (a comment usually made by those positing 9/11 truths), it's utterly inconceivable that anyone
other than the US could actually pull something like this off?
So there are many places inbetween being a frothy truther and not giving a toss about it - usually occupied by those of us who actually want to know what happned rather than only ever look at the words that confirm to an already made up mind...
Alex Jones approached me to be on a show with him ( via the 7/7 Inquiry Campaign group lawyers). I never got back. Man's a howling charlatan.
