so of the 201 arrested on saturday, 149 people were charged, and 138 of those were charged for aggravated trespass at fortnum and mason
i thought the aggravated bit was dropped?
so of the 201 arrested on saturday, 149 people were charged, and 138 of those were charged for aggravated trespass at fortnum and mason
Hopefully, some of the squatter/social centre types will think long and hard about their role - there's been some signs of that in the Deptford Jobcentre squat/social centre. I know that they've been very keen for it to be a proper community resource and a place where those fighting the cuts can meet or come for help etc. So there's been a quite up-front approach of not allowing parties/raves etc. in an attempt to exclude the life-styler types that might put off a lot of working class people from getting involved. I've not been down myself yet, but I've spoken to a couple of mates with their heads screwed on and things are definitely moving in the right direction with that. Early days though......
i thought the aggravated bit was dropped?
Marches, demo's, strikes, direct action, community engagement (but IMO, this doesn't have to be in any order - they can be complimentary and organised) to make a stand and some noise to both the government and the public who seem to think that its inevitable to have cuts because there are no other ways.
Good day out all round really, what happens next is key though. Agree with Bone's suggestion that there's a disconnect between some sections that's going to take some serious movement/work to overcome. Haven't really come up with anything more thought through than that for now.
INterestingly they've all been given bail conditions barring them from central London during the Royal Weekend with court dates in May
Some of the kind of actions/tactics which can succeed - e.g. occupations of nurseries or libraries which are to be closed because of cuts and keeping those services open to the public with a combination of volunteers from the public and workforce - are not that radical
I didn't mean that, I meant what are you hoping to make happen with regard to changes in policy? and or leadership.
They pretty much did on saturday - till the evening anyway.
If it could have been contained and deliberately wasn't, then that begs the question as to why it wasn't.
Sorry to derail the thread a bit (and apols if this has been picked up on already), but thought this would be of interest - whilst the media continues to froth about the anarchos, Vince "Man of The People" Cable has announced the scrapping of the 50% tax band - it be in the Graun here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/mar/27/cable-confirms-ending-50p-tax-rate
I thought I'd sort of described that in post 1021. Given that I'm not a member of any of the mainstream political parties, I've got rather limited power to make anything happen! And despite having been in Labour in the past, found that my voice amongst many seemed to be limited when it comes to change in policy away from neo-liberal, put things out to the market/private sector, we musn't upset the rich/powerful belief of the three main parties. Which is why I left the party and am a bit defeated when it comes to mainstream politics.
Perhaps I should re-join in the hope to 'destroy things from within'.
I may be chatting shit here, but a few of us were talking on the way down that the coppers would either go in hard to demonstrate 'this is what we can do for you' or go soft to demonstrate what happens when the police take it easy. Police Fed's comments the other week were clear brinkmanship imo.
Not sure he is, at least i've never seen him claim it - and the stuff he writes usually has a blurb saying who they belong to. Most of is academic work is on US socialists in the first half of last century. he rarely seems to write on anything today - and after that crap i see why.
I don't think the hands-off approach was some engineered tactic to elicit the required smashed shop windows to feed the press.
I think they were just outnumbered and playing light touch because of the 'official' tuc nature of the main event etc.
Already filed on the 'Why the Lib Dems are shit' thread, always plenty of stuff to add
Hi btw to urban
But decisions of that kind are made at operational level, not by individual plod or even individual officers.
If it could have been contained and deliberately wasn't, then that begs the question as to why it wasn't.
Good day out all round really, what happens next is key though. Agree with Bone's suggestion that there's a disconnect between some sections that's going to take some serious movement/work to overcome. Haven't really come up with anything more thought through than that for now. (Also good to see TC and Ds, chico etc)
You and yours could start with quitting the petty judgementalism of those that don't meet your purist criteria.
There's a fuckload more people in this country that would support radical action, but are pushed away because they don't meet the standards of those who have committed wholesale.
This is true...
I don't think the hands-off approach was some engineered tactic to elicit the required smashed shop windows to feed the press.
I think they were just outnumbered and playing light touch because of the 'official' tuc nature of the main event etc.
nope. Too much invested. They stand or fall with the ptb.
You what?