Ancillary staff are the problem.
Do make up your mind. You're flitting about like a moth with it's arse on fire.
Lack of training or knowledge of hospital procedure, delays, tiredness... these aren't minor things in a hospital. They are killers. Infections aren't spread by dirty hospitals. They are spread by ignorance of patient cases and poor contact hygiene. Both of these are major faults of ancillary staff.
There was me thinking they were major problems for the permanent medically-trained staff. You know, the ones who actually do wound dressing etc.
That's exactly what you are saying when you suggest that temporary staff are every bit as good as regular staff acquainted with their patients.
Hmmm, I haven't mentioned the use of temporary staff anywhere, or suggested that temporary staff are "as good as" regular staff.
I
did mention that staff will still be in attendance, but nothing about where they'd be sourced from (in most cases the TUs make sure that their members make internal arrangements, though).
Want to throw any more fictitious crap into the mix?
It's NHS by numbers, bodies in position with little thought of patient care. And that's just in the hospitals.
And you
know this...how? Through extrapolating your personal experience to a national level of effect? Because some guy down the pub told you? Because you have sound data to support your claim?
You say nothing changes, but all you mean is numbers.
Don't tell me what I mean, especially when you're doing so in order to boost your own argument, there's a good chap.
No.
Standards
may drop. it isn't a given.
people will suffer... and for what? Because some posters can't be bothered to think of ways to get their point across without needing vital services to also strike?
Have you
any idea how far one has to be pushed, and one actually has to go, to strike? It's not some wildcat decision, it's something that has to conform to regulation regarding how the ballot is conducted, what percentage of the membership responds against the percentage of membership in favour, etc, and strikes, especially for unions such as the RCN, have to be undertaken in a way that has minimal effect on their patients.
You think that those union members haven't already exhausted any alternative method of getting their messages across prior to deciding to strike? Of course they have. They're currently all but obliged to by law, you pusillanimous twit.
Will you be calling the doctors who don't wish to leave their patients 'scabs'?
Why would I do that?
Again, you show that you have little idea as to how services are maintained during a strike. If a doctor doesn't wish to leave their patients, they don't have to. That's why medical staff are generally left to make internal staffing arrangement during a strike.