Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Are you going on the “Hate March”? (11/11/23) - Poll

Hate March?

  • Yes

  • No, I cannae make it but I’ll be there in hateful spirit

  • No, there’s not been enough genocide to my taste yet


Results are only viewable after voting.
It's like flippin' crimewatch on here.

77702579-12739771-image-a-14_1699784003166.jpg

British Transport Police have now confirmed that three men have now been arrested in connection with a racially aggravated altercation which took place at London Waterloo Station at around 5.30 p.m. on Saturday 11 November 2023.

A 57-year old from Surbiton, south west London; a 61-year old from West Molesey, Surrey; and a 33-year old from Christchurch, Dorset have all been taken into custody.
 
Personally im not comfortable with doxing people (even aggressive bellends or far right arseholes) and grassing them up to their work and the police. I can see why people do. But Im sure the police would find them anyway cant be that hard.

The coconut banner is distasteful and maybe a bit racist but seems like a massive over reaction police getting involved.
 
Formidable KO!
late to the party but this applies to so many

1699894932123.png
'ill informed uneducated right wing man tryna have an opinion on something he is uneducated about'
caption on the still from the video of a white woman saying this to a station employee at (Leeds?) station
 
Personally im not comfortable with doxing people (even aggressive bellends or far right arseholes) and grassing them up to their work and the police. I can see why people do. But Im sure the police would find them anyway cant be that hard.

The coconut banner is distasteful and maybe a bit racist but seems like a massive over reaction police getting involved.
They've clearly had a team trawling social media in search of people to arrest. This is the best they could come up with. :rolleyes:

Lesson for us all. Be careful what you post. If in doubt, don't post it. The world will survive your not sharing it.
 
Last edited:
The coconut one I had a look at.

It's a joke. Woman holding it is from ethnic minority.

Coconut is slang for some who is black on outside and white inside. Someone who acts like white person. So it's saying Sunak and Braverman are acting like white people.

( As it happens the term slightly irritates me )

It's offensive but in context not racist.
 
The police have described it as a racist slur. I'm not sure that's entirely correct. It's a racially charged slur, certainly. But if any particular race is being maligned here, it is white people. I doubt that is what the police are getting at.

As I said, if this is the best (worst) the police could come up with after hours and hours of scouring the internet, it only goes to show how absent from the rally obnoxious sentiments were.
 
I heard a lot of Allahu Akbah-ing from the more militant Muslim participants in little blocks. And some chant connected to this in Arabic I didnt understand (no bunning the kufar ones though) I thought there would be more fuss about this from the usual suspects tbh... the police monitors were definitely recording a lot at points.

Then again probably neither racist or illegal. Just ive only ever been to lefty protests before tbh so it was my first time seeing people stopping to pray by the side of the march and chanting Islamic (but maybe not Islamist) stuff.
 
77702581-12742905-The_fourth_man_an_Arsenal_fan_was_filmed_shouting_vile_expletive-a-20_1699873319290.jpg

One of the men involved in the incident at Waterloo Station was wearing an Arsenal FC shirt with the number 41 on the back, over a grey hoodie top. That individual was filmed threatening and shouting obscenities at a group of people, including calling them "terrorist c****s".


77736381-12743111-image-a-46_1699879299212.jpg

That is probably why a family friend of landscape gardener James Thomas, the proprietor of J.T Landscaping Services of Christchurch, Dorset, has told reporters that James Thomas intends to report to the police today.
That's another fashion crime imo .Wearing a football shirt over a hoodie should be legally confined to those under 9 years old
 
The coconut one I had a look at.

It's a joke. Woman holding it is from ethnic minority.

Coconut is slang for some who is black on outside and white inside. Someone who acts like white person. So it's saying Sunak and Braverman are acting like white people.

( As it happens the term slightly irritates me )

It's offensive but in context not racist.
and how do "white people" act?
I am White. Am I acting like a Black person when I speak up in favour of a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip?
 
The homemade banners at these marches are one of the things I like about them.

As Riklet says these marches aren't the usual lefty marches.

It's not like usual dreary trot arguments about correct wording on a placard are relevant on these marches
 
and how do "white people" act?
I am White. Am I acting like a Black person when I speak up in favour of a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip?

I did say it irritates me

It is related to white supremacy viewpoint Even if ethnic minorities get to top of politics it's only because they are acting like white people.
 
I heard a lot of Allahu Akbah-ing from the more militant Muslim participants in little blocks. And some chant connected to this in Arabic I didnt understand (no bunning the kufar ones though) I thought there would be more fuss about this from the usual suspects tbh... the police monitors were definitely recording a lot at points.

Then again probably neither racist or illegal. Just ive only ever been to lefty protests before tbh so it was my first time seeing people stopping to pray by the side of the march and chanting Islamic (but maybe not Islamist) stuff.
Yeah, been a lot of Arabic chanting at the ones I've been to, have sometimes tried to ask someone for a quick translation but obvs it's not always easy in a big noisy crowd... I think one of the really big common ones, at least where I've been, is about defending Al-Aqsa, found a video about it here:

(Disclaimer, have not actually watched the video yet so can't really endorse the contents, but it was the first resource that I turned up looking for an explanation of the Birruh Biddam Nafdiika ya Aqsa chant.)
 
So apparently the chant “from the river to the sea Palestine will be free” is antisemitic because it questions the existence of the state of Israel.

Is it?




“It’s important to remember this chant is in English and it doesn’t rhyme in Arabic, it is used in demonstrations in Western countries,” he said. “The controversy has been fabricated to prevent solidarity in the West with the Palestinians.”

Pro-Israel observers, however, argue the slogan has a chilling effect. “To Jewish Israelis what this phrase says is that between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean, there will be one entity, it will be called Palestine – there will be no Jewish state – and the status of Jews in whatever entity arises will be very unclear,” Yehudah Mirsky, a Jerusalem-based rabbi and professor of Near Eastern and Judaic Studies at Brandeis University.

“It sounds much more like a threat than a promise of liberation. It doesn’t betoken a future in which Jews can have full lives and be themselves,” he said, adding that the slogan made it more difficult for left-wing Israelis to advocate for dialogue.

Mirsky argued that those who chant the slogan are “supporters of Hamas”, while Sultany claimed that pro-Palestinian protesters should not be equated to supporters of the armed group, who were the exception at the thousands-strong protests.
 
it a chant that depending on who telling the story behind it then it can be label as such

does not help that it was adopted as part of the hamas charter in 2012

so the Isreali state view can push for it be banned as a anti semitic slogan
 
It certainly doesn’t seem antisemitic to me, mainly for the reason mentioned by mojo pixy

It seems to me that it opposite-says Israel shouldn’t exist.
 
ah no worries story :)

all good .. was just explaining that in the last few years accusations of what and what is not antisemitic have tended to be weaponized and its lead to a lot of gray areas
was just elaborating on some of the outcome of that process
 
Yeah, it is at minimum I suppose an expression of wanting a one-state solution, I'm not going to say that it could never be antisemitic but there's nothing preventing it from people chanting it to express their genuine support for a democratic state from the river to the sea with equal rights for all citizens. I used to be less-than-enthusiastic about it on the grounds that if a slogan makes people uncomfortable then it's probably best avoided if possible, but given the amount of ridiculous nonsense chatted about it in recent weeks, I've now been pushed in the direction of being more positive/defensive about it.
More reading, if anyone fancies it:
 
Back
Top Bottom