DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
Christ the entire cast of Pilgrims Progress are out. Canuck (Christian) Shevek (Pliable, blates) and now Mr Worldly-Wise
There are many degrees of disabled and vulnerable people. You shouldn't need it spelling out to you.
Actually, I'd rather not. It's a lot personal.
I think it's enough to say that while the majority of people would be largely unaffected by that kind of general strike, there are a large number of people reliant on medical, care or support services just to get through a 24hour day.
While measures can be made to compensate... just that lack of continuity of care can cost lives.
Actually, I'd rather not. It's a lot personal.
In strikes where nurses and doctors vote to strike they invariably still provide emergency level cover. As such there are few if any disabled people left to their own devices as a result of the strike. Which is not the case as regards those who will be affected by the cuts.
Well why bring it up in the first place then? It was a reasonable question to ask and yet you come out with this....
Emergency level cover costs lives. In a myriad of ways that would be to painful and gory to go into. Of this I have personal experience.
I didn't say it wasn't a reasonable question. It's just a little too personal just now.
Nevertheless, without needing to go into specifics we can still discuss this subject.
Actually, I'd rather not. It's a lot personal.
The cuts will cost lives. What else do you suggest people do, striking, ie withdrawal of labour, is the last weapon people have.... So, what do you suggest they do??
I suggest we show some solidarity and march/strike on their behalf. Longer and harder, targeted specifically at areas this particular government treasures... public schools, private institutions and financial organisations.
Well why bring up your parents as a direct reply if it's too personal?
To show how easy it is to forget the effect of even small changes on the most vulnerable in society.
But, yeah, I probably should've stayed clear of mentioning parents specifically.
I don't think anyone forgets that to be honest... The only people I know who hand wring about it are the likes of those who will be doing the cutting that will have a much bigger effect on those you refer to thatn those who think the only the weapon most useful in this scenario is a strike....
You're fortunate in who you know, then.
The cuts will be devastating, and many people will suffer. That's why we need to fight them.
But I don't agree that a general strike is the next best step.
On their behalf? Take away their right to strike you mean? They should have less rights than me and others because they happen to work in healthcare?
I think we should be very careful not to mix up someone's 'rights'. With what is 'right'.
Eh? Why am I fortunate? I choose not to hang around or associate with people who don't give a fuck about those most vulnerable, that's all. But given the fact that ew've had the pleas, meetings, demos, consultations what else is left? If nothing else moves these people what else is there?
That's bollocks, people have the right to strike, it is both a 'right' and right.
I think the situation is much more complex than that.
Half a million people on the streets is just a start. When there's a million on the street in every city across the land and that still doesn't work then maybe we can think about sacrificing the short term vulnerable for the long term.
Half a million people on the streets is just a start. When there's a million on the street in every city across the land and that still doesn't work then maybe we can think about sacrificing the short term vulnerable for the long term.
And how often and for how long should that continue then? By the time we've yhad a few the cuts will already be having their impact.
A million in every city? Get a grip.
Every worker has a right to withdraw their labour when faced with an injustice, and your liberal hand-wringing isn't in defence of disabled people. You are using disabled people to justify inaction in the face of a brutal attack on... disabled people.
And you think a general strike will be more effective? How so?
I'm not using anything.
When there's a million on the street in every city across the land and that still doesn't work then maybe we can think about sacrificing the short term vulnerable for the long term.