Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Who will win the 2024 US election?

Who will win?


  • Total voters
    147
Well, that is the hope…
The hope of MAGA though, in the disputed election scenario, probably rests on the states rights agenda and interpretation of the constitution. Hence, red states declaring that they believe that Trump won and calling on those state forces that are under the control of individual states with republican administrations to act accordingly against “tyrannical” federal interference. At that point you have a constitutional crisis, with the federal government confronting the very question of using military force internally that has outraged their half of America when hypothesised by Trump himself (as a way he would deal with opponents) during the election campaign.
I think that's a highly unlikely scenario.

I can see Trump losing and being left with little more than impotent rage.
 
Jesus


My brother-in-law lives in the US and is a Mormon convert of Asian descent who married into a Mormon family who are very conservative as you would expect.

I never discuss politics with them for obvious reasons but I heard via my wife that their (very large) extended family are mostly no longer voting for Trump although they did the previous two elections but are voting for some third candidate instead.

That piece of information made me feel Harris will win, that article is the first verification I've seen of my anecdote being part of a larger trend.
 
Last edited:
Harris still way underpriced. I came into a couple hundred quid this week and I'd be happy to risk it on Harris and stand to get back 500 at current odds.

The only thing stopping me doing do is that if Trump wins, I'm gonna need that money and more besides to cheer me up.
 
Last edited:
Guardian piece on 'herding' amongst the pollsters, creating the impression that it is neck and neck. No evidence for it, but strong suggestions they are finding wider margins in their data but are then 'flattening' the actual poll results to avoid getting it wildly wrong. Pretty cowardly if true - you only had one job to do - but might explain why the results have been so 'improbably' consistent.

 
Not a prediction however this , rather long but very readable, blog by economist Michael Roberts explains exactly why working class voters don’t see much benefit from the economy under the Democrats .

 
Can you contextualise that for us?

We know Biden won big among postal voters last time out. How does this compare to that? We also know Trump is now saying that it's ok to vote postally, so how has that affected Republican early voting?

Same kind of question re the second stat. What was the split in men/women for early voting in the last election?
The Dems have a very capable GOTV operation so not sure anything Trump says will matter much without a comparable one…
 
Guardian piece on 'herding' amongst the pollsters, creating the impression that it is neck and neck. No evidence for it, but strong suggestions they are finding wider margins in their data but are then 'flattening' the actual poll results to avoid getting it wildly wrong. Pretty cowardly if true - you only had one job to do - but might explain why the results have been so 'improbably' consistent.

I suspect that if a more unlikely result comes out as true then the second explanation the authors give will be correct rather than the first one
“Some of the tools pollsters are using in 2024 to address the polling problems of 2020, such as weighting by partisanship, past vote or other factors, may be flattening out the differences and reducing the variation in reported poll results,” they write.
But I don;t actually think it is that improbable that the shares of the vote will be quite close - it was in 2016, it was in 2020, it has been in other elections. Why would Harris win by a much larger margin than Biden? For good or ill people know what Trump is and what Harris and the Democrats are.
(Which does not mean that the correction factors polling companies may be using are correct).
 
I suspect that if a more unlikely result comes out as true then the second explanation the authors give will be correct rather than the first one

But I don;t actually think it is that improbable that the shares of the vote will be quite close - it was in 2016, it was in 2020, it has been in other elections. Why would Harris win by a much larger margin than Biden? For good or ill people know what Trump is and what Harris and the Democrats are.
(Which does not mean that the correction factors polling companies may be using are correct).
Well - cos trump is even more extreme and demented and has declined physically - and is now a convicted felon - whereas Harris is considerably younger than biden and trump. Plus Roe vs Wade got overturned since the last election. All reasons that Harris might beat Trump convincingly. Not saying she will -but all stuff that could have a significent impact (especially the abortion stuff - as we've already seen in the midterms)
 
Well - cos trump is even more extreme and demented and has declined physically - and is now a convicted felon - whereas Harris is considerably younger than biden and trump. Plus Roe vs Wade got overturned since the last election. All reasons that Harris might beat Trump convincingly. Not saying she will -but all stuff that could have a significent impact (especially the abortion stuff - as we've already seen in the midterms)
You could argue that this was already baked in in the 2020 and 2016 elections - both Biden and Clinton won convincingly with women, Trump won with men in both elections.

We're all in the dark really. Pollsters are flailing, finding their historical precedents to be poor predictors but with little to base corrections on.

I think we can say a few things with confidence. Harris will win comfortably among women, as Clinton and Biden did. Harris will win the popular vote, as Clinton and Biden did, probably quite comfortably.

But could Trump fluke a victory like he did in 2016? The idea should be ridiculous and outlandishly unlikely, but it isn't quite.

If I were a pollster, I'd be tempted to throw out some numbers without trying to correct, particularly if they're predicting a big Harris victory. I do think that's possible - the possible range is between a big Harris victory and a Trump fluke win. If nobody else is predicting that and you are and you're right, you've made your name. Got to be worth a punt.
 
You could argue that this was already baked in in the 2020 and 2016 elections - both Biden and Clinton won convincingly with women, Trump won with men in both elections.
That's certainly true, though Trump has been almost deliberately undermining his position with women over the last few days. And I doubt that coming out with misogynistic shit necessarily brings on board an equivalent number of male bigots. No idea what the result will be and I don't think the 'Trump has cognitive decline' stuff is either helpful or necessarily true. However he does seem to have lost the instinctive touch he had that allowed him to make his pitch in 2016.
 
You could argue that this was already baked in in the 2020 and 2016 elections - both Biden and Clinton won convincingly with women, Trump won with men in both elections.

We're all in the dark really. Pollsters are flailing, finding their historical precedents to be poor predictors but with little to base corrections on.

I think we can say a few things with confidence. Harris will win comfortably among women, as Clinton and Biden did. Harris will win the popular vote, as Clinton and Biden did, probably quite comfortably.

But could Trump fluke a victory like he did in 2016? The idea should be ridiculous and outlandishly unlikely, but it isn't quite.

If I were a pollster, I'd be tempted to throw out some numbers without trying to correct, particularly if they're predicting a big Harris victory. I do think that's possible - the possible range is between a big Harris victory and a Trump fluke win. If nobody else is predicting that and you are and you're right, you've made your name. Got to be worth a punt.
The abortion stuff is new though. As is Harris being significantly younger.
 
Well - cos trump is even more extreme and demented and has declined physically - and is now a convicted felon - whereas Harris is considerably younger than biden and trump. Plus Roe vs Wade got overturned since the last election. All reasons that Harris might beat Trump convincingly. Not saying she will -but all stuff that could have a significent impact (especially the abortion stuff - as we've already seen in the midterms)
Like LBJ I think all the stuff is baked in already. And the Democrats did less well in the 2022 midterms than 2018.

In 2020 the Democrats had the advantage of Trump's terrible handling of Covid (and general presidential actions) very much at the front of voters minds, Biden offering something new, and no hot conflict in Palestine causing them headaches with some of their base.
 
The poll shows that women — particularly those who are older or who are politically independent — are driving the late shift toward Harris.

“Age and gender are the two most dynamic factors that are explaining these numbers,” Selzer said.

Independent voters, who had consistently supported Trump in the leadup to this election, now break for Harris. That’s driven by the strength of independent women, who back Harris by a 28-point margin, while independent men support Trump, but by a smaller margin.

Similarly, senior voters who are 65 and older favor Harris. But senior women support her by a more than 2-to-1 margin, 63% to 28%, while senior men favor her by just 2 percentage points, 47% to 45%.


 
Back
Top Bottom