What is your favourite conspiracy theory?
- Thread starter Badger Kitten
- Start date
- Status
editor said:
Its no worse than calling me a conspiraloon you hypocrite
You can threaten to ban me all you like, its a sign you feel threatened. You`ve stuck your reputation firmly on one side of the fence and you refuse to let me question your views, if I do....I`m a conspiraloon.
So how am I allowed to ask ten questions on 9/11?
Blagsta said:
I didn`t I said such weapons existed.
Its only common sense to assume that after hitting the streets of America they will one day be in use here.
Please stop semantic nitpicking.
The cynics are weak, what exactly are you people united behind? Besides hating people who don`t agree with you? If I was so mad then people would ignore my posts and it wouldn`t matter if i was posting questions.
What right have you got to decide what subjects can and can`t be discussed? Is it hurting anyone to talk about govt complicity on 9/11? Would be REALLY SUPER suprised? Jeeez
Blagsta
Minimum cage, maximum cage
Azrael23 said:I didn`t I said such weapons existed.
Its only common sense to assume that after hitting the streets of America they will one day be in use here.
Please stop semantic nitpicking.
OK, lets recap - you imply that the police are using these weapons, here - " I love the non lethal weapons around.....The police are so nice to us thesedays.
Instead of beating you with a truncheon they just point a gizmo at you and you drop with massive brain-pain and vomiting.....yay...."
Then when I pull you up on it, you call it "semantic nitpicking"
Maybe if you were more careful with semantics, you wouldn't come to the absurd conclusions that you do.
editor
hiraethified
9/11 has been discussed to death here and I've no wish to entertain another gullible idiot repeating the same fact-free fantasies from the same idiotic sites all over again.Azrael23 said:
And far from being 'threatened' I'm just totally bored with seeing another embarrassing loon regurgitating the same laughable c'n'p bollocks while declaring themselves as some sort of truth warrior.
Look around you. You're not changing anyone's minds with your endlessly recycled yarns and seeing as it appears very unlikely you're going to change the fucking record, I can't see much point in allowing you to carry on.
And comparing me to Hitler is about the last fucking straw.
Blagsta said:
I was at seattle for the protests. Have you seen the footage?
Just because I say people who dissent against authority are falling victim to these types of police tactics thats not to say I mean the UK. A lot of people in Seattle weren`t American but they were victims nonetheless. We are one people under a global system of economics, d`you understand?
You are semantic nitpicking. Address the points, namely the surge in recent police technology for dealing with mass crowds. What are they planning for? Oooh its the war on terrorism!
Well when was the last time you saw a crowd of terrorists?
editor said:
If its so fact free how come I can back up my claims with articles and interviews you can never seem to refute.
You concentrate on two or three things i`ve said which I cant conclusively prove (ie my view) but as for the issues like 9/11 which is almost beyond doubt you refuse to answer. Wheres the thread with the david schippers interview in?
I wonder how many decent responses to that evidence I`ll find?
Questions 1 to 8 in my earlier post await your attention ... 
William of Walworth said:Questions 1 to 8 in my earlier post await your attention ...
Sorry they were all conspiracy theories and your a conspiraloon. I refuse to answer them because they are drawn upon scant evidence and are merely ill contrived......conspiracy theories....
errr...
YEAH!!
Blagsta said:
What are you on about?
I assume your trying to suggest I was saying sound weapons were used?
NO.
I was talking about all non lethal weapons. There was plenty of teargas and water cannon there.
Have you finished yet? Perhaps you could try making a point rather than just criticising mine....
Blagsta
Minimum cage, maximum cage
Here's your original post on the subject
and now you say you were on about water cannon and teargas?
You're a liar and a fool.
Azrael23 said:Oooh don`t forget to mention sound cannons...
I love the non lethal weapons around.....The police are so nice to us thesedays.
Instead of beating you with a truncheon they just point a gizmo at you and you drop with massive brain-pain and vomiting.....yay....
and now you say you were on about water cannon and teargas?
You're a liar and a fool.
Blagsta said:
I`ve explained myself perfectly well, you know what I meant in if not lets clarify.
The police in the US have sound weapons.
The police use lots of "non-lethal" weapons like tear gas, rubber bullets, sound weapons, water cannons on US....as in we the people.
Then I rip it out of the way non lethal weapons are played as friendly when in fact they are`t, because they involve lots of pain and can still cause deaths.
What exactly is it you disagree with Blagsta? What exactly are you foaming at the mout for? Your the Whacko mate.
Blagsta said:
Look if you think I meant to say that, whatever. But I told you what I meant. You can`t start responding to what, you think I think...
Listen to me.
No they aren`t but the levels of brutality were, I saw a group of peaceful sitdown protestors sprayed with tear gas. I saw a woman with a helmet on have it ripped off whilst praying and have tear gas sprayed in her face....
I saw CS grenades just tossed into groups of youths, people beaten with batons, kicked.
They had a fucking field day and it ain`t gonna get better now they have bloody sound cannons.
Why do you direct so much scorn at me? I`ll i`m doing is informing you of something, if the police were planning to change their weaponry to cattle prods in one hand and a mini chainsaw in the other wouldn`t you want to know?
- Status
Similar threads
