editor
hiraethified
Is that your philosophy here then?Azrael23 said:You tell people something enough times and it becomes true.
Is that your philosophy here then?Azrael23 said:You tell people something enough times and it becomes true.
Where have the police used sonic weapons on the public in the US please?Azrael23 said:I said the police have new sonic weapons (i`ve proven this to be true)
editor said:He's notched up a whole collection of FAQ-busting offences in just the last 6 hours:
1. cut and paste-a-thons
2. unacceptable mod personal abuse
3. conspiraloonery
4. fucking about with user names.
So what the fuck's he still doing posting here?
editor said:Where have the police used sonic weapons on the public in the US please?
editor said:Is that your philosophy here then?
Markyd said:My favourite Conspiracy theory is that all conspiracy theories are part of a conspiracy to keep your mind off important shit!
No, that's bullshit and you know it.Azrael23 said:have and use is not the same thing. i`ve already made that clear.
editor said:No, that's bullshit and you know it.
So what US police forces have sonic weapons for use on their civilians?
And is it being used as a WEAPON, as I asked and you claimed, YES/NO?Azrael23 said:The New York Riot Police?
editor said:And is it being used as a WEAPON, as you claimed and the question asked, YES/NO?
editor said:Where have the police used sonic weapons on the public in the US please?
Wrong.Azrael23 said:It IS a weapon. Thats its soul use.
Ah, the familiar "let's change the subject because I'm losing the argument" trick....Azrael23 said:In a semi-related point, did anyone see the articles concerning the plans to press ahead with new regional police super-forces in the UK?
editor said:Wrong.
Ah, the familiar "let's change the subject because I'm losing the argument" trick....
Have you got any proof that the US police used sonic weapons on the public in New York, otherwise could you explain what you were doing posting up that picture please?Azrael23 said:I`m not in an argument. You want to be in an argument when did I indicate I`d slipped to your level?
This place exists to air issues and views, not to play host to your personal witchhunts, which seem to be based mainly on boredom.
editor said:Have you got any proof that the US police used sonic weapons on the public in New York, otherwise could you explain what you were doing posting up that picture please?
So what did you mean when you said this:Azrael23 said:For the millionth time, I`ve already explained that I have never said that they`ve been used yet.
editor said:So what did you mean when you said this:
"The police are so nice to us these days.
Instead of beating you with a truncheon they just point a gizmo at you and you drop with massive brain-pain and vomiting.....yay...."
So what gizmo have the police been pointing at you 'these days'?
Pingu said:actually
I have head of sonic devices being developed for crowd control. They were bsed on some idea about developing sonic weapons for military use that would emit sound waves at the same frequency the human body resonates at. but they also found that it was totally impractical. the use of vlf (very low frequency) devices though is possble (think being next to a really loud bass speaker and the uncomfortable feeling you get). no idea though if it ever went any further than a concept
Azrael23 said:I didn`t claim it had been used yet.
Azrael23 said:Well you`ve both been consistently shown to be harassing me.
Don`t try and bin it, heres an article you should read.
Don`t make these weapons out to be harmless...Weaponising the police is not a sign of a free country is it?
Also take the time to read the upcoming variations of this technology.
CNN
I`ve shown you that the police in the US have them installed already.
and now we see the UK govt is interested...
Azrael23 said:The New York Police?
IIRC the unit they tested "worked" in that it induced nausea and the occasional turd-in-pants accident, but was vast and unweildy, and needed a separate truck-sized generator to achieve it's full 50-metre range.Groucho said:I have seen a report posted up on Indymedia that US police tested sonic crowd control devices on peaceful demonstrators (not a 'sonic canon'). Since the US do have them it doesn't seem beyond the bounds of possibility.
The BBC have reported that UK police are considering use of a sonic non-lethal weapon currently used for crowd control in Iraq. Simular devices are used in Israel against Palestinians. Ears can be damaged.
BBC 11 Nov 2005
Last week a cruise liner used a "sonic weapon" to deter pirates. The device is also used by the US military in Iraq.
Now the Home Office and police forces are looking into using it in the UK.
Markyd said:My favourite Conspiracy theory is that all conspiracy theories are part of a conspiracy to keep your mind off important shit!
Markyd said:Erm hello! Why does no one think like this?
why are conspiracy theorists so determined to belive info they have when it is likely to be as contaminated as everything else?
William of Walworth said:Marky's is a conclusion that's at times quite hard to avoid, that many conspiracists are acting (even if inadvertantly) in the interests of the establishment. because the implausible bollocks they so often come out with, serves to discredit other more reputable exposes of government ill-deeds ...
No, this one is kosher; I've seen pictures of it from different angles, and checked out the website of the manufacturer. They seem to have deployed them in New York for the Republican convention, though I've never heard any reports of them being used, and it's been officially stated that they're being tested in Iraq, where they could be doing anything. It's a focussed sound device called the LRAD - I've posted about it before.ViolentPanda said:Is your picture supposed to show some kind of sonic weapon?
See, I thought I'd better let you know that if you're implying that the round bit on top of the van is a "dish" of some sort then;
a) it's nowhere near the right size to propagate the kind of frequencies necessary for a "sonic weapon" and
b) it's a hatch.