Wilf
Slouching towards Billingham
... though I'd make the same point about what this says about Labour's ability to re-engage.Yeah I know. But it's the same here. Ten years of fucking tory cuts and they still keep getting back in.
... though I'd make the same point about what this says about Labour's ability to re-engage.Yeah I know. But it's the same here. Ten years of fucking tory cuts and they still keep getting back in.
and the media's ability to whitewash... though I'd make the same point about what this says about Labour's ability to re-engage.
Everyone says this until it happens.
"How could Biden beat me when he's clearly really shit?"This is one of the reasons people reckon it’s a swizz.
“This can’t happen, it’s so unusual, it must have been a coordinated hoax.”
Oof, I didn't know that!! Or do you mean the only one people will watch rather than the only one that's available?Yes, their anger has been misdirected by people who profit from maintaining the status quo. You have to remember that in some parts of the US, Fox News is the only news source.
Re-engage since when, though? Since Blair? He didn't re-engage with people struggling. He just took them for granted. Think you have to go back a long way to find a Labour govt that came to power on the back of properly engaging with their core and natural supporters. Wilson accepted a lot of Tory shit in the 60s. I reckon you've got to go back to 1945 tbh.... though I'd make the same point about what this says about Labour's ability to re-engage.
However, I couldn't imagine this succeeding at the Houses of Parliament. I'm sure that those at the head of any group trying this would be shot.
An impeachment, if successful in the Senate, can be a bar from seeking office. Impeachment means you abused the power of your office and you don't get to be elected again, if that's what the Senate decides. As to whether other politicians should have the right to impose such a sanction, well that's up to the constitution. The US constitution gives them that power but sets a high bar at 2/3 majority.
Seems sensible enough to have mechanisms in place to remove a corrupt president in extremis. How would you do it?
Can an impeached president be re-elected?
Sheila. Your stebrother's name is still visible through the black effect you've used. It's a very common name so not that important but you obviously didn't intend to.
I don't disagree. From their pov, though, he pretty clearly incited insurrection yesterday. There are certainly grounds.I'd leave him to spend his last two weeks in office muttering impotently, and if there is evidence that could lead to conviction, give him a long, fair trial during which all thar evidence could be aired. As to preventing him being re-elected in 2024, that's best done by offering a credible alternative both to him and the neoliberal status quo.
Didn't some protestors break into parliament about 15 years ago? I think it was during the fox hunting bill or something like that.
Edit - yes..
BBC NEWS | Politics | Pro-hunt protesters storm Commons
news.bbc.co.uk
The Dems have just taken control of all three bits of government - president, senate, house of reps - for the first time since 2009. And that with a system that is biased against them. They're not doing so badly.
What about newspapers?Yes, their anger has been misdirected by people who profit from maintaining the status quo. You have to remember that in some parts of the US, Fox News is the only news source.
Sheila. Your stebrother's name is still visible through the black effect you've used. It's a very common name so not that important but you obviously didn't intend to.
I well remember the debate in the House of Commons in 1994 on the Age of Consent (for gay men). MPs voted for 18 (down from 21), but narrowly rejected 16 (and equality). The massed ranks of gay rights activists/protesters in Parliament Square promptly stormed St Stephens entrance, which had to be barricaded and closed. Meanwhile I was locked inside with all the other activists and protesters. Fortunately, we knew some tame Labour MPs who took us off to one of the bars and we all got pissed. That's how they do things in Britain!Yes, five, not five hundred in the meantime the police were battering the shit out of the fox hunting masses outside
Fox hunting activists disrupt debate on ban
The best way to get in is either as the guest of an MP or peer or queue to sit in the public gallery, but both methods put limits on the number given access. They've also now put up glass barriers in the public gallery of both houses, so you can no longer bombard parliamentarians from on high with horse shit of pink talcum powder.
"How could Biden beat me when he's clearly really shit?"
Coming from Trump first, and from many of his supporters now. But the thing they forget, or don't realise because they are surrounded by like-minded people, is how much the other half of the country hates Trump.
Oof, I didn't know that!! Or do you mean the only one people will watch rather than the only one that's available?
What about newspapers?
RIght. And this is infuriating and frustrating when trying to talk to them.
The best way to get in is either as the guest of an MP or peer or queue to sit in the public gallery, but both methods put limits on the number given access. They've also now put up glass barriers in the public gallery of both houses, so you can no longer bombard parliamentarians from on high with horse shit of pink talcum powder.