Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

US election 2020 thread

I've been reading about the get out the vote effort of the Navajo and Hopi nations. If you recall, the Navajo have been very hard hit by Covid 19. When they asked for help with supplies the Trump Administration sent native tribes body bags.




Looking closely at the Arizona returns, it appears that it was the Navajo who put Biden over the top and helped flip Arizona.

The moral of the story is don't fuck with the Navajo.
I found this while reading through the latest edition Yuwipi Woman, it made me smile.
AFDC214B-A3BA-453E-B688-4083918C3B58.jpeg
 
JTG , Thats pretty remarkable considering covids impact on the economy
Looking at that graph it very much looks like things were taking a downward slide, then the stimulus came along and took things up before a down turn again. But I guess it's perception that counts and they still sit higher than they did four years ago. In terms of the fundamentals of popularity, Trump was doing well and it seems only the handling of Covid and all his other bullshit have dragged him down
 
I suspect it’s a trick of the median. We are used to thinking of the median as being more representative of the “average person” than the mean, but that doesn’t mean it can replace an overview of the complete range. If the richest 51% of people double their money and the other 49% of people lose everything, the median will show a doubling.

So when the US sent everybody a $1200 paycheque, the only thing that matters for the median assessment is — was the person sitting at the 50th percentile more or less than $1200 worse off before that cheque arrived? I don’t find it hard to believe that even if 20% of people lost their job, the 50th percentile person was broadly as they were before that $1200 arrived.

To reiterate: it’s a trick of the maths. It doesn’t tell you anything about what has happened to the bottom half of society, wealth-wise. Only what happened to the person exactly in the middle.
 
I suspect it’s a trick of the median. We are used to thinking of the median as being more representative of the “average person” than the mean, but that doesn’t mean it can replace an overview of the complete range. If the richest 51% of people double their money and the other 49% of people lose everything, the median will show a doubling.

So when the US sent everybody a $1200 paycheque, the only thing that matters for the median assessment is — was the person sitting at the 50th percentile more or less than $1200 worse off before that cheque arrived? I don’t find it hard to believe that even if 20% of people lost their job, the 50th percentile person was broadly as they were before that $1200 arrived.

To reiterate: it’s a trick of the maths. It doesn’t tell you anything about what has happened to the bottom half of society, wealth-wise. Only what happened to the person exactly in the middle.
Yeah that makes perfect sense
 
Looking at that graph it very much looks like things were taking a downward slide, then the stimulus came along and took things up before a down turn again. But I guess it's perception that counts and they still sit higher than they did four years ago. In terms of the fundamentals of popularity, Trump was doing well and it seems only the handling of Covid and all his other bullshit have dragged him down
In these 'are you better off now than then' polls, there is also the factor that, over the course of a person's working lifetime, they tend on average to get promotions and earn more as time goes on, see their debts start going down, etc.
 
I suspect it’s a trick of the median. We are used to thinking of the median as being more representative of the “average person” than the mean, but that doesn’t mean it can replace an overview of the complete range. If the richest 51% of people double their money and the other 49% of people lose everything, the median will show a doubling.

So when the US sent everybody a $1200 paycheque, the only thing that matters for the median assessment is — was the person sitting at the 50th percentile more or less than $1200 worse off before that cheque arrived? I don’t find it hard to believe that even if 20% of people lost their job, the 50th percentile person was broadly as they were before that $1200 arrived.

To reiterate: it’s a trick of the maths. It doesn’t tell you anything about what has happened to the bottom half of society, wealth-wise. Only what happened to the person exactly in the middle.

Or even to the top half - it is possible for the median income to rise at the same time as everybody else’s income falls. Medians should always be looked at along with means (and vice versa) - which is just a lazy way of saying look at the shape of the whole distribution - single statistics can never describe it all. IMO.
 
Us citizens have to pay us income tax even if living overseas so maybe that has something to do with it.
They retain voting rights forever don't they? Fairly sure I know of people who are retired overseas and have no intention of returning 'home' but who have the vote
 
Us citizens have to pay us income tax even if living overseas so maybe that has something to do with it.
They have to do a tax return. However, they get credits for the taxes they pay in the country they live in. So an American living in the UK is very likely to pay zero US income tax. They'll be eligible for UK furlough money as well, so paying them US furlough doesn't really make sense.
 
Yeah. My American colleagues have been away for 12 and 15 years respectively, are still liable for income tax there (even though all their income is here and on PAYE) and could and did both vote.
Yep i believe boris johnson had to pay us income tax until he renounced his us citizenship a few years back. He was born in new york to british parents who returned to the uk afterwards.
 
Back
Top Bottom