On (1) I agree that technocratic liberals is probably a better descriptor, so let's use that.
On (2) it is true that Biden doesn't have the personal baggage and unpopularity that Clinton had. But let's also be clear. In policy terms, in social, economic and cultural terms, Biden is about to run, essentially, the same campaign that Clinton ran and lost on in 2016. At the same point in the election cycle Trump trailed Clinton by 9% and now trails Biden by the same, but with two key differences from then and now that are being overlooked:
a) Trump support is strengthening among white voters (74% of the electorate) and the solid segment of support among Hispanic voters is moving in the right direction. The latest polling shows white voter satisfaction with Trump is 20% higher than it was at this point 4 years ago. Among Hispanic voters the latest WSJ poll showed his support increasing from 28% (2016) to 31% (now).
b) On all polls Trump remains in the lead on the economy and by a larger margin than in 2016
The same WSJ poll showed that among 'up for grabs' voters Trump has a 10% lead over Biden. The latest NSBC poll (and others) show the Biden lead decreasing in both the Rust Belt and Sunbelt states. The lead for Biden is approaching margin of error levels and this is before the campaign really intensifies.
Finally, landslide victories are normally won by candidates who are popularly perceived to be the candidate of 'change' and 'modernity'. Insurgent campaigns develop momentum, energy and engagement as a result. Biden is running a campaign based on the polar opposite. It's essential offer is to reset and return America back to some point in the past (Before Trump, the 90’s, whatever). The problem with that of course is that a return to the past isn't going to motivate people outside the base that it already has. Like Trump and the GOP the Democrats remain unpopular. The form of politics that Biden is to his core remains deeply unpopular. Most of the Biden support is based on lesser evilism rather than positive factors.
If 2016 taught the Democrats anything is was that the only way to beat Trump decisively is by acknowledging the surging desire for change and to put forward a programme - and a candidate - that reflects it.
The selection of Biden, and the manner in which the machine delivered him and defeated Sanders, was premised on an explicit rejection of 'change'. It was cloth eared.
It’s premised on on anAnti-Trump feeling/and a return of the professional managerial class to be enough to motivate its base and activists (because we know if nothing else that the Democrat machine alone can't win) and, crucially, to win the 'up for grabs’. It’s the same strategy as Clinton‘s basically.
It assumes the moral revulsion is enough and is wide enough to get home. It swaps an unpopular candidate for a less unpopular candidate.
As the campaign intensifies we can expect to see Biden painted at the candidate of defund the police/white BLM protestors smashing things up/antifa/stuff so off the wall that it will take the breath away.
The aim will be to motivate still angry white ‘left behind’ voters in the key states we’ve identified. It will target those fearful of civil war and riots.
It will seek to solidify the lead among the up for grabs by appeals to patriotism and yes, racism. It will seek to demotivate working class democratic support. It’s exactly how Nixon won by building an alliance of the reactionaries and the left behind and culturally angry in the 1970’s. Like then, a depressing and generational ‘culture war’ appeal over class interests can be stood up because of the essentially reactionary politics of the democrats.
I simply do not see any way to a Biden landslide. In a ‘normal’ year with a GOP candidate who wasn’t Trump I’d write Biden off now tbh. As it stands it’s 50/50
So as I read this, with there being 77 electoral votes on those remaining states, and with Trump ahead in each (Arizona already called Biden), is this election Trump's to lose?OK so uncalled states:
Arizona Biden +130,000 & 580,000 to count
Georgia Trump +102,000 & 410,000 to count
Michigan Trump +300,000 & 1.6m to count
NC Trump +76,000 & 290,000 to count
Penn Trump +678,000 & 1.9m to count
Wisconsin Trump +119,000 & 650,000 to count
Hope that's clear to read, been a long night!
Yeh the second Friday in November 2024Going back to bed until Friday seems a good idea.
Assuming a full count (yeah I know!) and knowing that a lot of those votes skew urban and by mail... not necessarily.So as I read this, with there being 77 electoral votes on those remaining states, and with Trump ahead in each (Arizona already called Biden), is this election Trump's to lose?
It’s worth remembering the received wisdom that Democrats are more likely to use postal votes and that its postal votes that are taking longer to count.So as I read this, with there being 77 electoral votes on those remaining states, and with Trump ahead in each (Arizona already called Biden), is this election Trump's to lose?
He'd knowSo he's declared victory and declared fraud.
They have to be unfolded and flattened and everythingIt’s worth remembering the received wisdom that Democrats are more likely to use postal votes and that its postal votes that are taking longer to count.
He’s won the honest votes. It’s the fraudulent votes he’s lost.So he's declared victory and declared fraud.
It's all fuckedThe votes left to count look promising for Biden in Georgia, Wisconsin. Not sure if he can flip the others. Think PA's gone.
No, in many cases the remaining votes will be from Democrat heavy constituencies. Does not mean Biden will win but you can't make the simple assumption aboveSo as I read this, with there being 77 electoral votes on those remaining states, and with Trump ahead in each (Arizona already called Biden), is this election Trump's to lose?
Cheers - I was wondering how real the buffer is. They look like big numbers but if there's a huge skew to Dem on the postal vote, it's no gimme.No, in many cases the remaining votes will be from Democrat heavy constituencies. Does not mean Biden will win but you can't make the simple assumption above
This election highlights how wrong the whole vote counting process is in USA. It really needs over hauling.
Even in NC where there's only c5% of the vote left to count, the counties that are noticeably low on counting so far (90-95%) are blue and urban (Charlotte, Fayetteville, Raleigh)Assuming a full count (yeah I know!) and knowing that a lot of those votes skew urban and by mail... not necessarily.
Fully prepared to be wrong yet again but there are hundreds of thousands of votes left in Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta and elsewhere
But, you know, lawyers
Yeah.
AN is completely out of his depth here.
When is the penny going to drop for the left?
I mean, most western states are now on some form of all-mail elections and they work absolutely fine. The west has far fewer problems than the rest of the countryA former British ambassador to the US pointed out that it's rather stupid of Trump to call fraud in an election that he might well turn out to have won legitimately.
And Farage was going on and on about postal votes being unfair, though even he conceded that for this election, with the pandemic, they had to be allowed. I was annoyed that AN didn't say well, it doesn't matter what your opinion is, that's the system, so they still count.
This election highlights how wrong the whole vote counting process is in USA. It really needs over hauling.
According to CNN, we should have a result from Wisconsin in the next 15-20 minutes.
They struck me as a right wing Led By Donkeys and they're fucking rubbishLincoln Project have been great entertainment, through this tbf, fighting the good fight. Methinks Mr Sirota is spoiling for a fight - He must be new to Twitter, it's really not the arena for tit-for-tats...