Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

US Democratic Party Primaries 2019

The sad part is, Trump will probably successfully cling to the "outsider" label, even though it was only 15 months ago that Republicans were warning about the danger of "radical leftists" seizing power from centrist Democrats and impeaching Trump if the party took control of the House.
 
This is based on 62% of the vote being counted (‘very securely’ according to the Iowa Dems). Sanders leading the popular vote.

Buttigieg might be coming centrist candidate of the centre....although he did go all in for this


Buttigieg on top, after the Iowa Democratic party announces partial results
Pete Buttigieg is on top, with a narrow lead over his 2020 competitors, according to the state Democrats, who have released partial results after an extended delay. These results represent 62% of precincts.
Here’s a breakdown:
Pete Buttigieg: 26.9% of the state delegates
Bernie Sanders: 25.1%
Elizabeth Warren: 18.3%
Joe Biden: 15.6%
Amy Klobuchar: 12.6%
 
This is based on 62% of the vote being counted (‘very securely’ according to the Iowa Dems). Sanders leading the popular vote.

Buttigieg might be coming centrist candidate of the centre....although he did go all in for this


Buttigieg on top, after the Iowa Democratic party announces partial results
Pete Buttigieg is on top, with a narrow lead over his 2020 competitors, according to the state Democrats, who have released partial results after an extended delay. These results represent 62% of precincts.
Here’s a breakdown:
Pete Buttigieg: 26.9% of the state delegates
Bernie Sanders: 25.1%
Elizabeth Warren: 18.3%
Joe Biden: 15.6%
Amy Klobuchar: 12.6%

Those numbers are how the delegates are portioned out. If you go by the popular vote, the number for Buttigieg and Sanders flip rather neatly.

Biden better pick it up fast, or he's toast.
 
Last edited:
Those numbers are how the delegates are portioned out. If you go by the popular vote, the number for Buttigieg and Sanders flip.

Biden better pick it up fast, or he's toast.

I know. That’s what I said!

I agree about Biden. He’s dreadful - just a charisma free zone. I think Buttigieg might get money behind him now as the best ‘stop Bernie’ hope of the centre. Until Super Tuesday at least
 
Still not sure what Bloomberg is doing? Spunking billions on his campaign, when hes not allowed in the count?!
 
Still not sure what Bloomberg is doing? Spunking billions on his campaign, when hes not allowed in the count?!

His eye is on March 3 Super Tuesday. His whole strategy is different to the rest. And he's currently tied at third according to this poll.


dem-preference-2020-hillharrisx.jpg
 
His eye is on March 3 Super Tuesday. His whole strategy is different to the rest. And he's currently tied at third according to this poll.


dem-preference-2020-hillharrisx.jpg
I guess Biden’s vote has to collapse a bit for Bloomberg to be seen as either the best anti Saunders candidate or the unity candidate ?
 
His eye is on March 3 Super Tuesday. His whole strategy is different to the rest. And he's currently tied at third according to this poll.


dem-preference-2020-hillharrisx.jpg


I'm not certain that I'm reading that right, but isn't that poll a month old?
 
At this rate the NH primary will have been run before Iowa fully discloses its results. What a total fucking shower. :facepalm:
 
there's enough to say about biden without resorting to Q-anon shit like that.
Only a billionaire man of the people can save America, apparently
The CNN pundits loved it and tried to spin as an important moment for Warren. I thought it looked a bit shit.

Just reading these posts reminds me, in part, of that old interview CNN did with Milton William Cooper back in 1992.

Sure he mentioned that eventually a billionaire would win the presidency, he worked for naval intelligence and had Q clearance - maybe this is where all the tinfoilers get their ideas from.

Just sayin.
 
The NYT (may be paywalled, I've just run out of free articles so only have it open on my phone :facepalm:) is also reporting that some of the results that have been released are 'riddled with inconsistencies and other flaws'. More than 100 precincts (according to their analysis) 'reported results that were internally inconsistent, that were missing data or that were not possible under the complex rules of the Iowa caucus'. They don't see any particular bias in favour of one candidate or another, and most errors aren't major. But not looking great for the caucus system.
 
The anti-Sanders hints on this are funny, as if it's somehow his fault for insisting on transparency in the process and actually recording numbers.
 
Still not sure what Bloomberg is doing? Spunking billions on his campaign, when hes not allowed in the count?!
he can also engage in an undignified vendetta against Trump with huge media spend drawing fire from other candidates.

This is going to be interesting....alas, I suspect, at the end of the day, we´re in for four more years of Trump. I really don´t see Bernie as presidential.
 
he can also engage in an undignified vendetta against Trump with huge media spend drawing fire from other candidates.

This is going to be interesting....alas, I suspect, at the end of the day, we´re in for four more years of Trump. I really don´t see Bernie as presidential.

Whatever is 'presidential' went out the window with Trump (if it hadn't already with the various shitshows before him). I do suspect he'd lose to Trump; too many vested interests, still too much fear of 'socialism', too many bitter liberals etc. But 'presidential' is a meaningless term.
 
Whatever is 'presidential' went out the window with Trump (if it hadn't already with the various shitshows before him). I do suspect he'd lose to Trump; too many vested interests, still too much fear of 'socialism', too many bitter liberals etc. But 'presidential' is a meaningless term.
you´re right...I should probably have put inverted commas round it or used an emoji

I suspect a lot of Americans wouldn´t vote for Pete Buttigieg for all the wrong reasons too.
 
I think we need to examine the internal consistency of that statement.
Interesting as in I've no skin in the game...I'm having to live under the "Tropical Trump" here in Brazil.
As a centrist who thinks Presidents achieve more if they can work across the aisle, I'd favour Biden or Bloomberg. But maybe those days are over.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Cid
Interesting as in I've no skin in the game...I'm having to live under the "Tropical Trump" here in Brazil.
As a centrist who thinks Presidents achieve more if they can work across the aisle, I'd favour Biden or Bloomberg. But maybe those days are over.

I suspect Biden couldn't work his way out of multi-story carpark these days.
 
Back
Top Bottom