phildwyer
Plata o plomo
Wikipedia reckons the USA has military bases in 85 foreign countries, while China has bases in 5. No contest:At least some of that image is inaccurate, there appears to be a US military base in Hong Kong?
![en.wikipedia.org](/forums/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2F6%2F6f%2FUSAGH-SIGHTS1.jpg%2F1200px-USAGH-SIGHTS1.jpg&hash=ec34dbd4d292ec332961c0d7284e62d6&return_error=1)
Wikipedia reckons the USA has military bases in 85 foreign countries, while China has bases in 5. No contest:At least some of that image is inaccurate, there appears to be a US military base in Hong Kong?
Obviously. That doesn't change the fact that the meme makes up several imaginary US bases.Wikipedia reckons the USA has military bases in 85 foreign countries, while China has bases in 5. No contest:
![]()
List of countries with overseas military bases - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
What conclusion you draw from the fact that the US is the worlds largst miltary power by far and has multiple basis on every continent and a miltary reach unique on the planet is up to the mind of the beholder, but there's no point diminshing the reality of it as some sort of anti-propaganda. Its the way it is.
Obviously. That doesn't change the fact that the meme makes up several imaginary US bases.
China has attacked all of their neighbours at some point during the Qing Dynasty, which was enormously expansionist. China didn't get so big by accident you know.And that doesn't change the fact that, both historically and in the present, the USA is a far more imperialistic and aggressive nation than China.
The basic point this that even if China wanted to take over the world, they cannot, unless the US Empire collapses.Nice graphic. It's missing quite a lot of information, though. Like how many of those bases are joint operations, how big they are, do they even still have US personnel present, and so on. Does it matter to you whether those bases are there with the consent of the local government? Also, those two bases within the Indian Ocean and the one in the middle of Australia are not "surrounding China" by any definition I would consider reasonable. It's a shit recycling of the same old propaganda that gets passed around concerning Iran and Russia.
China has attacked all of their neighbours at some point during the Qing Dynasty, which was enormously expansionist.
The basic point this that even if China wanted to take over the world, they cannot, unless the US Empire collapses.
The Chinese Communist Party claims all the territories which had been conquered by Qing as well, and then some (the Qing were pretty uninterested in naval territory but the current lot are interesting in claiming SCS).And which was overthrown more than a century ago.
They try to, they are just remarkably bad at it.Precisely. Furthermore, unlike the USA, China doesn't do cultural imperialism.
The Chinese Communist Party claims all the territories which had been conquered by Qing as well, and then some (the Qing were pretty uninterested in naval territory but the current lot are interesting in claiming SCS).
View attachment 398218
There are 7 Chinese military outposts in the South China Sea.
In addition there is a Chinese naval base in Cambodia:
![]()
China's secret naval base in Cambodia, through satellite imagery
Ream Base is a hidden asset for China. But with a new geospatial intelligence satellite system, its operations can be tracked in real-time.www.naval-technology.com
There are also bases in Pakistan and Tajikistan and one seemingly in construction in Sri Lanka:
![]()
China’s next overseas military base likely a Sri Lankan port, report says – The China Project
The People’s Liberation Army Navy’s first overseas military base was built in China-invested Djibouti, and researchers think Beijing could use the same playbook again.thechinaproject.com
I wonder what a map would look like including these bases and erasing the imaginary US ones.
If you are going to get all historical...they are both a pair of lightweightsBut that's still not very much territory is it? As compared to what the USA has nicked over the last couple of centuries. Again, I see no contest in the imperialism stakes.
Tibet and Xinjiang are rather large.But that's still not very much territory is it? As compared to what the USA has nicked over the last couple of centuries. Again, I see no contest in the imperialism stakes.
They try to, they are just remarkably bad at it.
Omg K-Pop isn't Chinese... you are trolling.It's not comparable. American culture swept the entire world in the C20th. People from Bolivia to Bangkok watched American films, wore American clothes, listened to American music. Can you imagine Chinese culture achieving a similar influence? I can't (K-pop nonwithstanding).
That's fair, yes the image is propaganda in tone.It does suggest though that the truth is rather inconvenient for the creators of such graphics, if they have to resort to lying by omission and giving false impressions of the data they do have by featuring a little B-52 icon on each location, a deliberate design choice which might give the uninformed an incorrect impression about the actual military presence of the US.
That's not the "the way it is" is it then?
Omg K-Pop isn't Chinese... you are trolling.
Why should anyone pay 25 quid to read this.For anybody who's interested, an article has just been published documenting how John Mearsheimer doesn't know what he's talking about re Ukraine. One of the authors summarises the paper here:
![]()
Thread by @jan_dutkiewicz on Thread Reader App
@jan_dutkiewicz: 🚨 New Publication 🚨 In @JIRD_jour, @jan_smolenski and I critique the trend of IR theorists with little expertise in Ukrainian, Russian, and Eastern European politics making broad descriptive and pre...…threadreaderapp.com
I know what K-pop is. My point was that Asian nations can be culturally imperialist.
Why should anyone pay 25 quid to read this.
For anybody who's interested, an article has just been published documenting how John Mearsheimer doesn't know what he's talking about re Ukraine. One of the authors summarises the paper here:
![]()
Thread by @jan_dutkiewicz on Thread Reader App
@jan_dutkiewicz: 🚨 New Publication 🚨 In @JIRD_jour, @jan_smolenski and I critique the trend of IR theorists with little expertise in Ukrainian, Russian, and Eastern European politics making broad descriptive and pre...…threadreaderapp.com
It's a tough one. I want US bases off Japanese soil but am also fearful of threats from China and North Korea.im not okay with it but i definitley dont think the US should intervene. do you think the US should intervene if China sends in the troops?
I know what K-pop is. My point was that Asian nations can be culturally imperialist.
Nah, you confused Chinese culture with Korean pop.I know what K-pop is. My point was that Asian nations can be culturally imperialist.
Confucius Institute - WikipediaPrecisely. Furthermore, unlike the USA, China doesn't do cultural imperialism.
Nah, you confused Chinese culture with Korean pop.