agricola
a genuine importer of owls
Can anyone explain this at all? Seems utterly incomprehensible
https://twitter.com/PennyRed/status/411567024813637632
Was that what that bloke was signing at the Mandela memorial?
Can anyone explain this at all? Seems utterly incomprehensible
https://twitter.com/PennyRed/status/411567024813637632
I blame The Toad.Why are there so many nonsense articles like this http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/13/beyonce-album-flawless-feminism now? A few vague mentions about feminism just seem to be a way for 'intelligent' broadsheets to sell celebrity gossip
Amazing, hidden stuff is because other women are too thick to get a blog and write in the guardian and new statesman(we're coming - and we're coming proper)
Mass lol of the day:
Your words ("...surprised by how casually violent the police have been...") caused me more than a few guffaws. All these fuckers have done is taken a page from the 1970s/1980s playbook! This is how it used to be, at protests and even football matches - you pretty much never knew whether the copper you were walking past would take a swing at you!To be fair though that was a tweet wasn't it? The format of twitter really lends itself to platitudes like that it's hard to avoid. And LP wrote something in the guardian about it that struck a decent tone and was largely hyperbole free iirc.
I know ULU and that Michael Chessum lad have had a really hard time off the police with his bail, and I was surprised by how casually violent the police have been in response to these demos and strikes, but after the way in which the government dealt out the most draconian sentences and bail conditions for people involved in the riots I can't say i'm shocked at all. I mean this is tame compared to that, thousands were jailed, and further thousands given fines, crippling bail terms, criminal records hat exclude from employment and certain benefits.
Bizarre intra-Adbusters/Occupy Wall Street bunfight over who gets to sell (or not sell) the Official Authorised Franklin Mint OWS Commemorative Dinner Plate or something:
http://storify.com/adbusters/stop-selling-occupy
I'm starting to get a little nervous - were Laura or Zoe on the debate team?
http://www.theglobeandmail.com//new...of-denver-high-school-gunman/article15972075/
Why are there so many nonsense articles like this http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/13/beyonce-album-flawless-feminism now? A few vague mentions about feminism just seem to be a way for 'intelligent' broadsheets to sell celebrity gossip
Mark Fisher said:The first law of the Vampires’ Castle is: individualise and privatise everything. While in theory it claims to be in favour of structural critique, in practice it never focuses on anything except individual behaviour.
...
The VC, as dupe-servants of the ruling class, does the opposite: it pays lip service to ‘solidarity’ and ‘collectivity’, while always acting as if the individualist categories imposed by power really hold. Because they are petit-bourgeois to the core, the members of the Vampires’ Castle are intensely competitive, but this is repressed in the passive aggressive manner typical of the bourgeoisie. What holds them together is not solidarity, but mutual fear – the fear that they will be the next one to be outed, exposed, condemned.
Laurie Penny @PennyRed3m
The new Beyonce is even better listening if you picture Lilly Allen spinning in a pit of her own racist irrelevance
What did Lilly Allen do?
she'd have to sue quite a few people. the dreadful one is far from the only critic (of the Hard Out here video)I'm tempted to retweet that to the celeb in question.
Hope you've got deep pockets or a good brief working pro bono, Penny Dreadful...
the only twerkers are black n asian, so its laughing at them (supposedly)
The fourth law of the Vampires’ Castle is: essentialize. While fluidity of identity, pluarity and multiplicity are always claimed on behalf of the VC members – partly to cover up their own invariably wealthy, privileged or bourgeois-assimilationist background – the enemy is always to be essentialized. Since the desires animating the VC are in large part priests’ desires to excommunicate and condemn, there has to be a strong distinction between Good and Evil, with the latter essentialized. Notice the tactics. X has made a remark/ has behaved in a particular way – these remarks/ this behaviour might be construed as transphobic/ sexist etc. So far, OK. But it’s the next move which is the kicker. X then becomes defined as a transphobe/ sexist etc.
Infantilising Xtina is a little bit sexist. I'm sure LP has complained about being called a silly schoolgirl and the like, but it's them what make the rules.Aguilera mouthing like a little girl
the only twerkers are black n asian, so its laughing at them (supposedly)
the only twerkers are black n asian
Infantilising Xtina
What did Lilly Allen do?
I hate that I know this, but she did something else as well as the video. She was having a twitter beef with the rapper Azealia Banks, and she sent her a picture of a penis made up like a golliwog. It can be found here (NSFW obvs) http://twobrowngirls.co/post/55456642182/in-more-racism-news-lily-allen-tweeted-a-picture
...so she has form. I don't know whether L. Penny is working from the full prosecutorial file or whether she is only referring to the video, but if I were her brief I would be entering that into evidence right away.
No ambiguity about a penis golliwog.
LP said:"Superpower", a shruggable song with a video of stylised rioting that had me running in squealing circles around my living room. This is not the writhing-against-sexy-police pseudo-radicalism of "Girls (Run The World)". There is not a single spurious circus animal in sight. Instead, there are cop cars on fire. There’s Bey masking up and charging at some armoured heavies, snogging a hooded anarcho-type in a possible nod to that viral photo of the riot-line kiss in Vancouver a couple of years ago.
LP said:Revolutions are inherently romantic, and that romance can always be co-opted by the unscrupulous to turn a profit. It's easy to imagine the death-knell of any movement for change starting to ring when its agitators find their slogans appearing on tshirts and mouthed by wealthy popstars with a history of shakin' it for dictators. Not everything, however, can be appropriated..
bey as in hakim bey?