Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

are you recognizing the sovereignty of the CSA?
i was wrong about that one, which is why i deleted the post. e2a: only a complete plonker would ask a question like that, i myself don't recognise israel (and btw nor do you) but nonetheless there it is

perhaps you could answer the questions in 22078 before posing any questions of your own
 
Last edited:
I haven't heard a more accurate description of the Russian aggressors' situation than "sleepwalking towards defeat..."

It's weird they use that quote from a war criminal though, who they describe thusly:

1680528888583.png
As well as his involvement of killing and torture in Ukraine, he's been found guilty in absentia of murdering the 298 people who were on board flight MH17 in a Dutch court following an international investigation. Not someone I'd describe as simply a "war blogger."
 
the US is doing everything reasonasbly possible to support Ukraine
i don't care, that's got nothing to do with the topic you raised.

have you heard of israel, and in particular have you heard of the six day war? and the subsequent occupation of the west bank and gaza strip (and sinai, but the zionists withdrew from there in the end). a war started by the occupier, a war won by the occupier, and the occupation continuing to today in the west bank while the gaza strip remains effectively sealed off by israel
 
I don't see a question posed there. Perhaps Rome or the Mongols weren't the last successful aggressor-occupiers, but if they weren't, the Phenomenon is rare...
 
I don't see a question posed there. Perhaps Rome or the Mongols weren't the last successful aggressor-occupiers, but if they weren't, the Phenomenon is rare...
by no means. it may be rare now but that is not to say it has always been rare. and i still await with interest your reply to my 22078. should the russians lose in ukraine that won't be because they started a conflict, nor because of any occupation, but because of their utter ineptitude in carrying it out
 
by no means. it may be rare now but that is not to say it has always been rare. and i still await with interest your reply to my 22078. should the russians lose in ukraine that won't be because they started a conflict, nor because of any occupation, but because of their utter ineptitude in carrying it out
I'd say the ineptitude was in Russia's aggressively invading Ukraine, in the first place, Inept strategy, not necessarily tactics. I don't think the russians would've shown to be incompetent had ukraine invaded them. Ukraine would've been easily repulsed.

The russian military was considered brilliant in their actions against ISIS. Hawks here were saying "why can't the US be like them?" (the russians)

It's the same military that is "sleepwalking" now in ukraine
 
I think the Russians are going to be defeated. I can't think of the last "occupier" that won the the war they started. Rome? The Golden Horde?
Us Brits didn't do too badly. We kept most of India, Australia and Canada for the best part of 150 years and the coastal bits of Africa for just over 100. You lot only kicked us out because the French turned up, and look where that got them a few years later...
 
the spanish took the americas from mexico south (and a fair amount north, what's now new mexico, arizona and texas and california for example) bar brazil, and kept it for several centuries. thought that'd occur to someone resident in the united states.
 
I'd say the ineptitude was in Russia's aggressively invading Ukraine, in the first place, Inept strategy, not necessarily tactics. I don't think the russians would've shown to be incompetent had ukraine invaded them. Ukraine would've been easily repulsed.

The russian military was considered brilliant in their actions against ISIS. Hawks here were saying "why can't the US be like them?" (the russians)

It's the same military that is "sleepwalking" now in ukraine
you're comparing two utterly dissimilar wars, the one against daesh being very different to the one against ukraine. if the americans weren't performing as well as the russians, well, that's not for the lack of practice - after all, the americans had a decade or more of small wars experience before the campaign against daesh began.
 
Us Brits didn't do too badly. We kept most of India, Australia and Canada for the best part of 150 years and the coastal bits of Africa for just over 100. You lot only kicked us out because the French turned up, and look where that got them a few years later...
They weren't really won through traditional Russia vs Ukraine style warfare though, were they?

The East India Company (EIC)[a] was an English, and later British, joint-stock company founded in 1600https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_India_Company#cite_note-5 and dissolved in 1874.[4] It was formed to trade in the Indian Ocean region, initially with the East Indies (the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia), and later with East Asia. The company seized control of large parts of the Indian subcontinent, colonised parts of Southeast Asia and Hong Kong. At its peak, the company was the largest corporation in the world.[vague] The EIC had its own armed forces in the form of the company's three Presidency armies, totalling about 260,000 soldiers, twice the size of the British army at the time.[5][6] The operations of the company had a profound effect on the global balance of trade, almost single-handedly[7] reversing the trend of eastward drain of Western bullion, seen since Roman times.[8]
 
the spanish took the americas from mexico south (and a fair amount north, what's now new mexico, arizona and texas and california for example) bar brazil, and kept it for several centuries. thought that'd occur to someone resident in the united states.
Tbf That was a present from a Pope, same Pope gave Brasil to Portugal. Pretty outrageous really, didn't even both with wrapping paper
 
Tbf That was a present from a Pope, same Pope gave Brasil to Portugal. Pretty outrageous really, didn't even both with wrapping paper
i don't think the people on the ground held up their hands and said 'ok, someone we've never heard of says you own our land, that's good enough for us'
 
They weren't really won through traditional Russia vs Ukraine style warfare though, were they?
russia v ukraine style warfare is anything but traditional. and you're apparently speaking from a position of abject ignorance, ignoring eg the war against the tippoo sultan, the anglo-sikh wars, and of course the great war around the mutiny. it's not at all like the british marched in and the indians rolled over. nor indeed did the french.
 
Back
Top Bottom