bcuster
Well-Known Member
a different situation, entirely. the usa prevailed in a civil war, unless you recognize the sovereignty of the CSAthe united states, 1865. you have heard of reconstruction i suppose?
a different situation, entirely. the usa prevailed in a civil war, unless you recognize the sovereignty of the CSAthe united states, 1865. you have heard of reconstruction i suppose?
i was wrong about that one, which is why i deleted the post. e2a: only a complete plonker would ask a question like that, i myself don't recognise israel (and btw nor do you) but nonetheless there it isare you recognizing the sovereignty of the CSA?
have you heard of israel?I think the Russians are going to be defeated. I can't think of the last "occupier" that won the the war they started. Rome? The Golden Horde?
* taps watch *I think the Russians are going to be defeated. I can't think of the last "occupier" that won the the war they started. Rome? The Golden Horde?
I think the Russians are going to be defeated. I can't think of the last "occupier" that won the the war they started. Rome? The Golden Horde?
israel six day war 1967, the us haven't won a war in bloody ages - barring things like panama and grenadaThe US?
It's weird they use that quote from a war criminal though, who they describe thusly:I haven't heard a more accurate description of the Russian aggressors' situation than "sleepwalking towards defeat..."
Former Russian commander in Ukraine says Moscow was unprepared for a protracted war and is now 'heading for military defeat'
Igor Girkin, who once led a group of Russian militants in Donetsk, said Moscow is sleepwalking toward defeat in Ukraine, per Ukrayinska Pravda.www.businessinsider.com
brave sir robinI think the Russians are going to be defeated. I can't think of the last "occupier" that won the the war they started. Rome? The Golden Horde?
the US is doing everything reasonasbly possible to support Ukrainebrave sir robin
i don't care, that's got nothing to do with the topic you raised.the US is doing everything reasonasbly possible to support Ukraine
i posted an opinion piece. I agree with the author that russia will be defeated. that's really the sum & substance of it..i don't care, that's got nothing to do with the topic you raised.
have you heard of israel, and in particular have you heard of the six day war?
so you never asked the question highlighted below?i posted an opinion piece. I agree with the author that russia will be defeated. that's really the sum & substance of it..
I think the Russians are going to be defeated. I can't think of the last "occupier" that won the the war they started. Rome? The Golden Horde?
by no means. it may be rare now but that is not to say it has always been rare. and i still await with interest your reply to my 22078. should the russians lose in ukraine that won't be because they started a conflict, nor because of any occupation, but because of their utter ineptitude in carrying it outI don't see a question posed there. Perhaps Rome or the Mongols weren't the last successful aggressor-occupiers, but if they weren't, the Phenomenon is rare...
I'd say the ineptitude was in Russia's aggressively invading Ukraine, in the first place, Inept strategy, not necessarily tactics. I don't think the russians would've shown to be incompetent had ukraine invaded them. Ukraine would've been easily repulsed.by no means. it may be rare now but that is not to say it has always been rare. and i still await with interest your reply to my 22078. should the russians lose in ukraine that won't be because they started a conflict, nor because of any occupation, but because of their utter ineptitude in carrying it out
Us Brits didn't do too badly. We kept most of India, Australia and Canada for the best part of 150 years and the coastal bits of Africa for just over 100. You lot only kicked us out because the French turned up, and look where that got them a few years later...I think the Russians are going to be defeated. I can't think of the last "occupier" that won the the war they started. Rome? The Golden Horde?
you're comparing two utterly dissimilar wars, the one against daesh being very different to the one against ukraine. if the americans weren't performing as well as the russians, well, that's not for the lack of practice - after all, the americans had a decade or more of small wars experience before the campaign against daesh began.I'd say the ineptitude was in Russia's aggressively invading Ukraine, in the first place, Inept strategy, not necessarily tactics. I don't think the russians would've shown to be incompetent had ukraine invaded them. Ukraine would've been easily repulsed.
The russian military was considered brilliant in their actions against ISIS. Hawks here were saying "why can't the US be like them?" (the russians)
It's the same military that is "sleepwalking" now in ukraine
They weren't really won through traditional Russia vs Ukraine style warfare though, were they?Us Brits didn't do too badly. We kept most of India, Australia and Canada for the best part of 150 years and the coastal bits of Africa for just over 100. You lot only kicked us out because the French turned up, and look where that got them a few years later...
The East India Company (EIC)[a] was an English, and later British, joint-stock company founded in 1600https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_India_Company#cite_note-5 and dissolved in 1874.[4] It was formed to trade in the Indian Ocean region, initially with the East Indies (the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia), and later with East Asia. The company seized control of large parts of the Indian subcontinent, colonised parts of Southeast Asia and Hong Kong. At its peak, the company was the largest corporation in the world.[vague] The EIC had its own armed forces in the form of the company's three Presidency armies, totalling about 260,000 soldiers, twice the size of the British army at the time.[5][6] The operations of the company had a profound effect on the global balance of trade, almost single-handedly[7] reversing the trend of eastward drain of Western bullion, seen since Roman times.[8]
Tbf That was a present from a Pope, same Pope gave Brasil to Portugal. Pretty outrageous really, didn't even both with wrapping paperthe spanish took the americas from mexico south (and a fair amount north, what's now new mexico, arizona and texas and california for example) bar brazil, and kept it for several centuries. thought that'd occur to someone resident in the united states.
More the traditional English method of killing everyone with maxim machine guns.They weren't really won through traditional Russia vs Ukraine style warfare though, were they?
The Maxim machine gun wasn't invented until 1884, long after England/Britain had secured dominance over India.More the traditional English method of killing everyone with maxim machine guns.
i don't think the people on the ground held up their hands and said 'ok, someone we've never heard of says you own our land, that's good enough for us'Tbf That was a present from a Pope, same Pope gave Brasil to Portugal. Pretty outrageous really, didn't even both with wrapping paper
I was thinking more of the BSA and South AfricaThe Maxim machine gun wasn't invented until 1884, long after England/Britain had secured dominance over India.
russia v ukraine style warfare is anything but traditional. and you're apparently speaking from a position of abject ignorance, ignoring eg the war against the tippoo sultan, the anglo-sikh wars, and of course the great war around the mutiny. it's not at all like the british marched in and the indians rolled over. nor indeed did the french.They weren't really won through traditional Russia vs Ukraine style warfare though, were they?
It wasn't that one sided . At Mboto Gorge our opponents had some particularly sharp slices of guava.I was thinking more of the BSA and South Africa
frankly omdurman more the apogee of that sort of thingI was thinking more of the BSA and South Africa
but not over vast swathes of africaThe Maxim machine gun wasn't invented until 1884, long after England/Britain had secured dominance over India.
israel six day war 1967, the us haven't won a war in bloody ages ...
no, it wasn't. now, you may be thinking of the major operations. but that wasn't the war, was it, just one campaign in it.In military terms, Iraq was a huge win.