Maurice Picarda
Actually, might as well flounce.
The funny thing, of course, is that these pictures relate to the Sol Campbell chants and so are of homophobes, or agateophobes, if anything, and certainly not of suspected racists.
I'm genuinely starting to think you're a bit thick.
I'm not 'acting the fool' Truxta. You've utterly failed to understand what I've written.
My posts.If you need it spoonfed: what did you post that supposedly mitigates LC's remarks?
IMHO...
What LC tried to do wasn't to abuse someone racially, it was to draw a parallel between racism and ageism.
It wasn't an appropriate comparison to make, it probably wasn't merited in the first place given the context "old" was used in, it was awkwardly executed, and it was certainly poorly judged.
But it wasn't racism, and to claim that it is for the sake of footballing rivalry would be more offensive than anything LC posted by a fair distance.
lol.Grow a fucking pair will ya.
While I really appreciate the effort I can't completely agree with Corax's valiant effort. If I was trying to draw a parallel between ageism and racism I would have need to use 'Paki tosser'. Which, of course, I wouldn't have done anyway.
There's nothing particularly wrong with using 'old' per se, but it becomes pejorative and offensive when coupled with 'tosser', which is exact the intent of the user.
Equally, there is nothing wrong with using 'ethnic Pakistani' which, fwiw, is a term every British Pakistani I've ever known is content with as a description of their ... ethnicity. As I’ve said repeatedly, is the Gov in every document it publishes. So it’s a little curious RAF is apparently mortified, paralysed in grief, barely able to breathe for having read the offending phrase on the internet.
But I do sincerely thank Corax for his sense and fairness of mind. As I do everyone else who hasn’t belittled racism by taking the opportunity to have a vacuous pop when there is an important issue here, and a necesary stand to be made.
If 'ethnic Pakistani' is racist you'd better let the Census people know, and the millions who describe themselves as such. But thanks for your insight. It was a response in kind - in the shape of a pointless descriptor - to an unpleasant, unthinking oaf who knows pretty well everyone in this thread has him on ignore when the bloody thing works.
We're playing Liverpool on Monday
Considering your defence of Suarez, you have some fucking cheek calling LC a racist.Is this where you don't equate ageism with racism? This, where you make your totally innocent and neutral remark about his ethnicity is a "response in kind"? Who's the fucking oaf, LC? Have a fucking think.
Considering your defence of Suarez, you have some fucking cheek calling LC a racist.
Au contraire, we're playing you. Prediction?
As I do everyone else who hasn’t belittled racism by taking the opportunity to have a vacuous pop when there is an important issue here, and a necesary stand to be made.
12 points the gap.
What you need to realise, young man, is that racist name calling is never appropriate. Now grow up and apologise.As I do everyone else who hasn’t belittled racism by taking the opportunity to have a vacuous pop when there is an important issue here, and a necesary stand to be made.
Oh, BBC Sport reckons Suarez is available...
When John Black QC, prosecuting, put it to Redknapp that he had been telling the court "a pack of lies", the football manager grew visibly emotional.
"You think I've put my hand on the bible and told lies? That's an insult, Mr Black, that's an insult," he said. "Everything I've told you has been the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God."
An indignant Redknapp then snapped: "Bring the bible up here again and I will put my hand on it." The manager hit back at suggestions that he had deliberately sought to evade tax, adding: "I'm the most ungreedy person you have met in your whole life, Mr Black. Ever. Ever."
Who needs greed when your annual salary is more than 4 million quid?
me to.I am still hoping he gets not guilty.
If 'ethnic Pakistani' is racist you'd better let the Census people know, and the millions who describe themselves as such. But thanks for your insight. It was a response in kind - in the shape of a pointless descriptor - to an unpleasant, unthinking oaf who knows pretty well everyone in this thread has him on ignore when the bloody thing works.