littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
Yeah, but this is a little different. It isn't a vote to approve a treaty, which can always be tweaked and presented again.There does tend to be one when the first goes against the EU
Yeah, but this is a little different. It isn't a vote to approve a treaty, which can always be tweaked and presented again.There does tend to be one when the first goes against the EU
No it doesn't. There are political realities to consider.Everybody's faith in liberal democracy here is touching.
It simply boils down to how much it matters to capital, and whether capital is sufficiently united on this.
Darth May slys in, Jonsons out in the cold. I was just checking and may wants out of the ooman rites stuff cos she got burned by abu hamza case that time. I've always said she's waiting to take the crownWhy? Cameron resigns, Johnson takes over as the new pro-Brexit pm. I don't see any scenario in which there is another referendum any time soon, tbh.
yes. And the fact is one faction of capitalists, the exiters are holding a smaller stick against the remainers. Thats why the question will be repeatedEverybody's faith in liberal democracy here is touching.
It simply boils down to how much it matters to capital, and whether capital is sufficiently united on this.
The same faction - capitalists - will be in charge whatever the result. And we'll have to agree to disagree, I think - there are other considerations, such as the maintenance of the appearance of democracy, to take into account. Plus, there can be a changing of the guard without a fall of government. Cameron out, whoever in, the process of turning an exit from the eu to the maximum advantage of the rich starts in earnest.yes. And the fact is one faction of capitalists, the exiters are holding a smaller stick against the remainers. Thats why the question will be repeated
In the event of an brexit vote there's no way the UK politicians would be able to ignore the result, however slim the majority. The lines have been clearly drawn on tht front.Somebody I was speaking to the other day reckoned that a Brexit vote would simply be ignored and there would be no withdrawal from the EU.
I could see that happening if the vote was narrow or the turnout was low or any other excuse there could be invalidate the mandate.
After all it's not like people would take to the streets over this.
Would they?
The same faction - capitalists - will be in charge whatever the result.
differing factions of capitalist. And the ones who are remain have the machinery and the power. The exiteers have enough clout and electoral backing to make this difficult but in the long run I just don't see it.The same faction - capitalists - will be in charge whatever the result.
Why would I want to take those companies out of the equation. Companies like Nissan, Honda, Matsushita who make here for the EU market are what I am talking about. If they have a tariff barrier put between them and their market, it is likely their next investments won't be here.Foregn companies? So what does this actually mean once you take the US, japanese, chinese and ME companies out the equation? and as Pickmans says, how much do they take out?
And, more importantly, why should any of this change if we leave?
If Leave does win (not likely) I'd put good money on their being a second referendum to ensure "democratic legitimacy". After all Johnson has already said that he'd be in favour of such a strategy.I dunno. A 50.6 vs 50.4 result in a sub50 turnout? I wouldn't want to bet on it.
Though personally I reckon it'll be a comfortable 60+ for Remain anyway.
Why is he on sky? what % of voters will be reached by that?Uh oh....
Didn't we have a thread on this sort of thing?
Why would I want to take those companies out of the equation. Companies like Nissan, Honda, Matsushita who make here for the EU market are what I am talking about. If they have a tariff barrier put between them and their market, it is likely their next investments won't be here.
the stance of the chalfonts ridden.he's wet himself
Show me a link that confirms the UK is the EU's biggest export market because I think I have seen figures showing it only represents about 3% of EU exports. Whereas the EU represents 40% of the UK's exports.I explained up-thread how the UK is the Eu's largest export market. Why the fuck would the Eu, after losing one of its few net contributors, then want to then penalise their best customer with punitive tariffs? (one's that currently don't exist for other non Eu european trading partners)
If that's the kind of diplomacy and business the Eu wants to conduct, then fuck 'em. Better out.
loads. Nuff people have sky. if I had the money I'd continue to steal via torrents rather than give murdoch any money but loads of people use sky and its a canny demographic to speak to in his termsWhy is he on sky? what % of voters will be reached by that?
Yeah, it was me that linked to that 3% figure "spouted" in this Economist article (bear in mind, the Economist is very biased on this vote) where they're obviously trying to debunk the 16% figure being used by team brexit.Show me a link that confirms the UK is the EU's biggest export market because I think I have seen figures showing it only represents about 3% of EU exports.
The 40% figure is total (see the HMRC site) which includes financial services. Above, I'm talking purely about manufactured goods.Whereas the EU represents 40% of the UK's exports.
2 different figures, economist is quoting the UK exports as a percentage of GDP rather than as a percentage of exports.Yeah, it was me that linked to that 3% figure "spouted" in this Economist article (bear in mind, the Economist is very biased on this vote) where they're obviously trying to debunk the 16% figure being used by team brexit.
The funny bit is, the Econimomist ran an article only 2 months previously contradicting itself by stating a 6.6% figure.
A bit miffed by this, I crunched the numbers of the official data (links kindly provided by gosub) and the 16% figure checked out!
Sky News is free, isn't it? I can see it & I certainly don't pay Murdoch for the 'privilege'.loads. Nuff people have sky. if I had the money I'd continue to steal via torrents rather than give murdoch any money but loads of people use sky and its a canny demographic to speak to in his terms
Which 2 figures from the 3 I mentioned?2 different figures, economist is quoting the UK exports as a percentage of GDP rather than as a percentage of exports.
and so we descend into barbarismSky News is free, isn't it? I can see it & I certainly don't pay Murdoch for the 'privilege'.
and so we descend into barbarism
the 2 that were originally being queried, 16% vs 3%.Which 2 figures from the 3 I mentioned?
OK Cheers, so the 6.6% figure from the economist is the real one to compare to the 16% one from that brexit site? (total export %)the 2 that were originally being queried, 16% vs 3%.
16% is exports to UK as percentage of exports, 3% is exports to UK as percentage of GDP
Like leaving but not leaving?