Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Urban 6 Nations 2018 Thread

Dulwich Hamlet FC‏Verified account @DulwichHamletFC
In the meantime, after we were told we’d receive all bar profits from match days, we’ve been told we won’t be getting a penny. (Est. £35-50K) We feel that this decision has been made purely to make our lives difficult. We are surviving on gates and donations alone.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"What about Boycotting the Bar ?
If no takings go to the football club how about making it be known more vocally
Come on youve helped refugee causes , Gay rights, cinema staff etc and all this other stuff
Maybe time to help yourself nearer home"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SO this is pleading and slagging off what the football club have done is it ?
Where has it said ive run them down for these causes ?
WHERE
Infact i donated tins of food a while ago
Dont lie, otherwise will report
Cant take a laugh or banter so makes things up to suit the agenda
WHERE HAVE I SLAGGED ANYBODY FOR REFUGEES, GAY RIGHT EXACTLY

Go away you dull cunt
 
Seeing lots of comments in Facebook about owens performance today. Strikes me as proper sour grapes given how England were dismantled. Let's be clear... This isn't a shit reffing decision that properly cost a game (ie Scotland against Australia rwc semi final).... England were taken apart today and comprehensively so.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
 
Seeing lots of comments in Facebook about owens performance today. Strikes me as proper sour grapes given how England were dismantled. Let's be clear... This isn't a shit reffing decision that properly cost a game (ie Scotland against Australia rwc semi final).... England were taken apart today and comprehensively so.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

It's not sour grapes to question a refs performance whilst acknowledging we were 2nd best, your strawman crowing is very telling tho.

We lost, most of us will take it on the chin, but you trying to engineer some kind of England supporter "whaa" complex is proper sad.

Read the tone of the thread ffs, we're having a laugh and you're acting the dick :facepalm:
 
It's not sour grapes to question a refs performance whilst acknowledging we were 2nd best, your strawman crowing is very telling tho.

We lost, most of us will take it on the chin, but you trying to engineer some kind of England supporter "whaa" complex is proper sad.

Read the tone of the thread ffs, we're having a laugh and you're acting the dick :facepalm:
It's sour grapes to blame the ref for the defeat. And that's the tone of many of the posts I've read. Which are on Facebook. Not here. Did you miss that part?

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
 
So argue on Facebook, nobody here gives a fuck.
You keep replying so obviously you do. And who made you spokesperson all of a sudden? You seem to be speaking for everybody all of a sudden. Was there an election for this position? Must've missed that one.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
 
It's not sour grapes to question a refs performance whilst acknowledging we were 2nd best, your strawman crowing is very telling tho.

We lost, most of us will take it on the chin, but you trying to engineer some kind of England supporter "whaa" complex is proper sad.

Read the tone of the thread ffs, we're having a laugh and you're acting the dick :facepalm:
Thing is, we have the right to question reffing performances. More than any game in the world the ref's interpretation can have a material impact on the outcome. I wasn't watching Nigel's performance in a critical way as I was too busy enjoying the outcome. However, he has form for reffing according to his preconceptions. Shit ref performance is a shit ref performance.
 
It's sour grapes to blame the ref for the defeat. And that's the tone of many of the posts I've read. Which are on Facebook. Not here. Did you miss that part?

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
Dude, I'm saying that Jackson had a pretty material impact on the outcome of our game. As I say, I wasn't watching Nige's performance with any kind of critical eye but I can well believe he was not 100% and that England may have a reason to feel aggrieved. This is the problem: refs can decide outcomes.
 
Dude, I'm saying that Jackson had a pretty material impact on the outcome of our game. As I say, I wasn't watching Nige's performance with any kind of critical eye but I can well believe he was not 100% and that England may have a reason to feel aggrieved. This is the problem: refs can decide outcomes.
I hear that. The end of the day though we're debating about what is a subjective opinion of how a game could've turned out if a decision or decisions hadn't gone against us.

What I'm suggesting is that reffing decisions like the one taken against Scotland in the rwc semis were far more clear cut and evidently cost a match in that case.

And in this English match today-it was obvious that even if they had the rub of the green with some of those decision that wouldn't have affected the outcome.

Which is why I'm baffled at some of the comments I'm reading from some English fans on Facebook

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
 
Ah yeah, in the ruck. I saw the replay and it looked ok to me. Also, he didn't blow for it straight away. Someone else spotted it?
Right. Just been speaking to a mate who's a ref.

White 4 (Joe Launchbury) was holding onto the ball in the ruck whilst he was on the ground. That slowed down things down and (possibly) enabled the player who eventually intercepted the pass to read the play better. He should have let the ball go as soon as he went to ground. However, he got off the ball as soon as Owens told him too and Owens let the play proceed, only calling the player back after he was through.

My mate reckons it was a mistake by the ref, but he's England through and through.

50/50 apparently, depending on who you support :D
 
Last edited:
Right. Just been speaking to a mate who's a ref.

White 4 (Joe Launchbury) was holding onto the ball in the ruck whilst he was on the ground. That slowed down things down and (possibly) enabled the player who eventually intercepted the pass to read the play better. He should have let the ball go as soon as he went to ground. However, he got off the ball as soon as Owens told him too and Owens let the play proceed, only calling the player back after he was through.

My mate reckons it was a mistake by the ref, but he's England through and through.

50/50 apparently, depending on who you support :D
That's interesting ta. I understand the decision process now. Argument I guess would be that a ref who does that kind of thing is wanting things to flow by not being over-officious, but he has to call it back if the offence led to the interception.

And it was a good flowing game, tbf. Maybe Owens isn't a good ref for England's style of play.
 
You can't beat Wales at Rugby, you can only score more points than them.

You beat us without doubt. Bossed us up front and won the gainline.

However, the refereeing contributed significantly to your continuity of possession, which contributed to your win. Don't see anything particularly controversial in that.
 
You beat us without doubt. Bossed us up front and won the gainline.

However, the refereeing contributed significantly to your continuity of possession, which contributed to your win. Don't see anything particularly controversial in that.

When a game is reasonably close in score and the refereeing calls are generous to the winning team it’s fair enough for supporters of the losing team to complain about the refereeing. Even if the winning team was on top. After all lots of teams that have seemingly had the better of a game manage to lose it anyway.
 
Someone's upset
e47ea7bedc56d9ad269dbe04d6e5d3cb.jpg


Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom