quite. but 'open borders - yes/no' adds nothing but noise to the debate. as you know.Sure. But I was specifically directing a question at a specific poster. That is allowed , surely?
And anyway on the very first page of the thread you said the Windrush generation were
"the tip of the iceberg. We need to make sure the argument is widened out at all opportunity."
deportations have been stopped by fellow passengers in the past
nice
not getting into a back and forth with you and could do with out your twisting or point scoringPresumably this is how you spend your free time or is it just something you expect others to do?
erm.point scoring
I would protest to the crew and try and get other passengers involvedWhay would you have said to those two heavies to make them see the error of their ways?
?erm.
I'm sorry, I'm confused.quite. but 'open borders - yes/no' adds nothing but noise to the debate. as you know.
I'm not 'stirring' anything. I'm asking a perfectly reasonable question of another poster.one without arseholes stirring it.
Fooled about what?you've got literally no-one fooled.
you wouldn't at least speak up in that situation?
Delayed maybe. Completely stopped, I doubt.deportations have been stopped by fellow passengers in the past
How do you know what he's being deported for?I would speak up and kick off and try and get other passengers involved if I was on a plane and someone was being deported
So you want a broader debate, but only on your terms? Don't work that way I'm afraid.This thread from Akala has some interesting background and analysis too:
Thread by @akalamusic: "Post war 'mass migration' myths and realities, a thread.So you may have seen lots of seemingly ridiculous commonwealth deportation cases rec […]"
pull the other one sonny jimI'm not 'stirring' anything. I'm asking a perfectly reasonable question of another poster.
this 2.4 bn does this include the uk?So you want a broader debate, but only on your terms? Don't work that way I'm afraid.
Ok, question for you. Should the 1948 situation have continued indefinitely? There are 2.4 billion people in the Commonwealth. Should they all have right of abode in the UK?
yesPresumably this is how you spend your free time or is it just something you expect others to do?
Correct. He may even have been a Jamaican national who had committed a crime at home and tried to flee to the UK and was being deported back to Jamaica.How do you know what he's being deported for?
this 2.4 bn does this include the uk?
The very heavy security would suggest he was on his way to Jamaican custody rather than 'just' being deported.
So if someone is 'just' being deported for eg overstaying a visa, they go to all this trouble rather than just simply making sure you get on the plane and confirming your arrival?No it doesn't. The heavy security is because he was male.
It's not unusual at all.
So if someone is 'just' being deported for eg overstaying a visa, they go to all this trouble rather than just simply making sure you get on the plane and confirming your arrival?
Excessive, to say the least?
yeh. you've yet to adduce a reason for everyone from e.g. india or canada or australia to come here.I believe it does, but UK population is less than .1 billion that's irrelevant really.
So if someone is 'just' being deported for eg overstaying a visa, they go to all this trouble rather than just simply making sure you get on the plane and confirming your arrival?
Excessive, to say the least?