Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The American mass shooting thread

yeh. the way this evidence thing works is the person who brings it to the table er brings it to the table.
How am I supposed to reference a book I have at home when I am at work? And who provides citations for every mention of a book on a bulletin board? No one. This is not Wikipedia. And only you seem interested in this, so I shall not bother to look in the book just to indulge your dickishness. You'll have to find it out yourself if you're that interested
 
How am I supposed to reference a book I have at home when I am at work? And who provides citations for every mention of a book on a bulletin board? No one. This is not Wikipedia. And only you seem interested in this, so I shall not bother to look in the book just to indulge your dickishness. You'll have to find it out yourself if you're that interested
I can wait till you get home. You said you had evidence, all I'm asking for is the page number not your firstborn son.
 
sorry fella, i'm not indulging your nonsense. you're not actually that interested, you're just being a dick
Your nonsense, I think you'll find, chuck. You say there's evidence then refuse to supply. And this is by no means the first time. Why do you say you can support your claim - in which I am that interested BTW - then pull the rug out from under yourself? Only one of us is bring a dick here, ducky, and it ain't me.
 
Your nonsense, I think you'll find, chuck. You say there's evidence then refuse to supply. And this is by no means the first time. Why do you say you can support your claim - in which I am that interested BTW - then pull the rug out from under yourself? Only one of us is bring a dick here, ducky, and it ain't me.
My initial comment was a question rather than a claim, but you forced me into trying to recall a book I read several years ago. I don't need to provide evidence - I am not writing a dissertation. This is an informal discussion. I thought it was worth asking if i recalled correctly, but you've led me down a fruitless path that no one enjoys reading. I don't know why you do this, it's really fucking boring.
 
My initial comment was a question rather than a claim, but you forced me into trying to recall a book I read several years ago. I don't need to provide evidence - I am not writing a dissertation. This is an informal discussion. I thought it was worth asking if i recalled correctly, but you've led me down a fruitless path that no one enjoys reading. I don't know why you do this, it's really fucking boring.
You brought up the book and now you want to weasel your way out of it. That's what's dull as it's one of your modi operandi
 
My initial comment was a question rather than a claim, but you forced me into trying to recall a book I read several years ago. I don't need to provide evidence - I am not writing a dissertation. This is an informal discussion. I thought it was worth asking if i recalled correctly, but you've led me down a fruitless path that no one enjoys reading. I don't know why you do this, it's really fucking boring.
Your initial comment was
Wasn't Germany awash with guns in the period leading up to the Nazis taking power? Surely it was one of the factors that led to their swift rise? There were militias out marauding, backed by the Nazis.
Which you then decided was something rje has in one of his books. But go on, put an egg in your shoe and beat it, as stephen king might say.
 
I only brought up the book cos you demanded it. I regret saying anything now. fucksake. can we not ever post our thoughts without such forensic examination? I believe it was a reasonable thing to venture that Germany was awash with guns in the 20s and 30s, and that gun freaks are wrong to compare gun control advocates to Nazis, as Nazis were armed to the teeth.
Why do you do this? it's no fun for anyone.
 
it's so weird cos you've gone to the trouble of finding and scanning in a long paper that seems to confirm what I was asking, and yet keep demanding I go look in a book I read a while ago to confirm something that is already being discussed in the thread. Idris2002 posted a video immediately before mine ffs.
 
assorted walty mcfuckwits thought the best way to counterprotest was to take their pet AR15 and stand around by the march occasionally in full mall ninja gear and once with a vehicle-mounted machine gun:facepalm:.

none of the idiots shot anyone even by accident so there's that:rolleyes:. but none of them came across as anything other than od at best intimidating nutters at worst.
 
it's so weird cos you've gone to the trouble of finding and scanning in a long paper that seems to confirm what I was asking, and yet keep demanding I go look in a book I read a while ago to confirm something that is already being discussed in the thread. Idris2002 posted a video immediately before mine ffs.
Soz I don't see in the article where it discusses the rise of the nazis in the context of availability of firearms, which is all I asked you about. I think we may have been a bit of cross-purposes as I suspect you were talking about the freikorps while I was interested in the greater Nazi use of or availability to firearms rather after the freikorps period, so more in the 1928-33 period. It's well known pretty much all the political parties had their street fighters but afaik firearms not a huge part of that. Oh and I'm not watching a 22 minute video the first minute or two suggested not wholly germane to the point I'm interested in.
 
Your nonsense, I think you'll find, chuck. You say there's evidence then refuse to supply. And this is by no means the first time. Why do you say you can support your claim - in which I am that interested BTW - then pull the rug out from under yourself? Only one of us is bring a dick here, ducky, and it ain't me.

Is possessing a dick is a prerequisite to being one?
 
Back
Top Bottom