I skimmed it and all it is for me is just another example of Corbyn bashing by someone who should have got behind a genuine far left representative. I've been so sick of all the attack pieces in supposedly leftwing places like London Review of Books and Guardian that I didn't really feel like reading another one in detail. Particularly because this piece seems just the same as the rest, saying Corbyn is incompetent and supports terrorists lalala, I find all these very vague allegations pathetic, i've been on a march where other people were shouting 'up with Hamas', so what, that doesn't make me a terrorist.
Let's not forget the Tories in the 1980s were saying "hang mandela" (Federation of Conservative Students) and Thatcher called the ANC terrorists - source:
The Conservative party's uncomfortable relationship with Nelson Mandela. Yes Corbyn expressed support for the IRA back then, so did a lot of the radical left. And it was Blair not him shaking hands with those scumbags McGuiness and Adams (who by the way directly ordered killings, as Kevin Myers says in his excellent book about the Troubles 'Watching the Door' ). Of course now it seems prescient because all the negativity helped defeated a genuine far left manifesto, so now all these commentators can crow and say they told us so. I find it all a bit chicken and egg, I wonder what would have happened if the left had actually got behind Corbyn. But of course that's not what happened and now we all have to suck it up. Anyway that's my two cents on that article that everyone else seems to like.